신학자료 전용 사이트

맥클린톡-스트롱 백과

Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological & Ecclesiastical Literature

백과사전 McClintock & Strong 1867 general

지원 언어 현황

영 한2%

영 48824/48824 원문 · 한 889/48824 번역 · 0 검수

48824개 항목

한영 비교 보기
ZONARAS, JOHANNES Zonaras, Johannes

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zonaras, Johannes a Byzantine historian, was born in the last part of the 11th century, and died about 1130.. He was secretary to the emperor Alexius Comnenus. After the death of Alexius (1118) he retired to the monastery of St. Elijah, in Mount Athos, and devoted himself to theological and literary studies. His *Chronicle, *from the creation till the death of Alexius, is a mere compilation from Josephus, Eusebius, Xenophon, Herodotus, Plutarch, Dio Cassius, etc., and was edited by Hieronymus Wolf (Basel, 1557), Du Fresne (Paris, 1686, 2 volumes), and Pinder (Bonn, 1841-44, 2 volumes). Of more value is his commentary on the *Syntagma *of Photius: Ε᾿ξήγησις τῶν ἱερῶν καὶ θείων κανόνων τῶν τε ἁγίων καὶ σεπτῶν Α᾿ποστόλων, καὶ τῶν ἱερῶν οἰκουμενικῶν*, *etc. In Latin and Greek the work was published at Paris in 1619; the best edition, however, is the one published at Oxford in 1672 fol. Zonaras also wrote scholia on the New Test., on which see *Zonarae Glossiae Sacrae Novi Testamenti Illustratae a F.W. Schurz *(Grimma, 1818-20). On the first two works see Schmidt, *Ueber die Quellen des Zonaras, *in *Zimmermann's Zeitschrift fur die Alterthumswissenschaft *(Darmstadt, 1839), volume 6, No. 30-36; Zander, *Quibus e Fontibus Joh. Zonaras Hauserit sueos Annales Romanos *(Ratzeburg, 1849); Biener, *De Collectionibus Canonum Ecclesiae Gricecc *(Berlin, 1827); the same, *Das Kanonische Recht der griechischen Kirche, *in Mittermaier's *Zeitschrift *(Heidelberg, 1855), volume 28, pages 201-203; Mortreuil, *Histoire du Droit Byzantin *(Paris, 1843), 3:423-428; Herzog, *Real-Encyklop. *s.v.; Lichtenberger, *Encyclop. des Sciences Religieuses,* s.v. (B.P.)
ZOOLATRY Zoolatry

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zoolatry (Greek ξῶον and λατρεία*), *the worship of animals. *SEE ANIMAL WORSHIP; SEE IDOLATRY*.
ZOOLOGY, BIBLICAL Zoology, Biblical

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zoology, Biblical This, like all other scientific *subjects, *is practically and incidentally, rather than systematically and designedly, treated in the Scriptures, yet many animals are mentioned, and their characteristics are given with substantial accuracy. In the Talmud a more copious and minute description is given of many animals (see Lewysohn, *Die Zoologie des Talmuds *[Frankfort-on- the-Main, 1858]). The popular and general classification into beasts, birds, reptiles, etc. is the usual Biblical one, and they are further distinguished as clean and unclean. See each of these designations under its proper head. The following is a full list of all the animals (including certain animal products) mentioned in the Bible, in the alphabetical order of the names in the original, with the ordinary rendering in the A.V., and the real name as nearly as modern research has identified it. See each term in its proper place in the body of this *Cyclopaedia. SEE NATURAL HISTORY*. *Achasteranim' *mules camels *Aetos *vulture eagle *Agur' *swallow swallow *Akbar' *dormouse mouse *Akkabish' *spider spider *Akko' *goat roebuck *Akrab' *scorpion scorpion *Akris *locust locust *Akshub' asp *adder *Alektor *cock cock *Alpex *fox fox *Alukah' *vampyre leech *Anakah' *lizard ferret *Anaphaih' *parrot heron *Arad' *onager wild ass *Arbeh' *locust locust *Ari' *lion lion *Arktos *bear bear *Arnbeth *hare hare *Arob' gad-fly *swarms *Arod' *onager wild ass *Aryeh' lion *lion *Asht *moth moth *Aspis *asp asp *Atalleph' *bat bat *Athon *she-ass she-ass *Attud' *he-goat he-goat *Ayah' *hawk"kite," vulture *Ayal' *stag hart *Ayalah' *doe hid *A'yit *beast bird *Bakar' *beef-animal ox *Barburnim' *goose fatted fowl *Batrachos *frog frog *Behemah' *quadruped beast *Behemoth' *hippopotamus behemoth *Bikrah' *she-camel dromedary *Chagab' *locust grasshopper *Chamor' *he-ass ass *Chanamel' *ant frost *Chapharpherah' *rat ole *Chargol *locust beetle *Chasidah' *stork stork' *Chasil' *locust locust *Chazir' *swine swine *Choiors *swine swine *Chole *opin gall *Choled *weasel weasel *Chomet *lizard snail *Daah' *kite glede,vulture *Dayah' *falcon vulture *Deborah' *bee bee *Dob *bear bear *Dishon' *antelope pygarg *Drakon *serpent dragon *Dukiphath *hoopoe lapwing *Echidna *viper viper *Epheh' *serpent viper *Eriphion *kid goat *Eriphos *goat goat *Ez *she-goat goat *Gamal *camel camel *Gazam' *unwinged locust palmer-worm *Geb *locust locust *Gedi' *kid kid' *Gediyah' *she-kid kid *Gob *locust grasshopper Gor' whelp young lion *Gozal' *fledgling youngbird *Gur' *whelp young-whelp *Hippos *horse horse *Hus *swine sow *Iyim' *jackals wild beasts *Kaath' *cormorant pelican *Kamlos *camel camel *Keleb *dog dog *Ken *gnat lice *Kephir' *young lion young lion *Ketos *sea-monster whale *Kinnam' *gnat lice *Kippod' *hedge-hog bittern *Kippoz' *arrow-snake great owl *Kirkaroth' *dromedaries swift beasts *Koach *lizard chameleon *Kokkos *cochineal scarlet *Konops *gat gnat *Koph *ape ape *Korax *crow raven *Kos *pelican owl *Kuon *dog dog *Layish *lion lion *Lebi' *lion lion *Lebiyah' *lioness lioness *Leon *lion lion *Letaah*' lizard lizard *Livyathan' *crocodile leviathan *Lukos *wolf wolf *Meshi *thread silk *Namar' *leopard leopard *Nemalah' *ant ant *Nemar' *leopard leopard *Neshar', *buzzard eagle *Nets *hawks hawk *Ochim' *owls doleful *Onarion, *or *onos *ass ass *Oreb' *raven raven *Ozinyah' *eagle osprey *Parash' *steed horse *Paradalos *leopard leopard *Parosh' *flea flea *Perah' *mole mole *Pere *onager wild ass *Pered *mule mule *Peres *eagle ossifrage *Pethen *serpent adder *Raah' *vulture glede *Racham', *vulture gier-eagle *Reem *buffalo unicorn *Rekesh *courser swift beast *Rem *buffalo unicorn *Renanah' *ostrich ostrich *Reym *buffalo unicorn *Rimmah' *worm worm *Sair' *he-goat satyr *Sas *moth moth *Schecheleth *purple shell onycha *Selav *quail quai *Semamith' *lizard spider *Serekon *silk silk *Ses *moth moth *Shablul' *snail snail *Shachal *lion lion *Shachaph *gull cuckoo *Shalak' *gannet cormorant *Shani' *cochineal crimson, scarlet *Shaphan' *rabbit coney *Shephiphon' *snake adder *Shual' *jackal fox *Skolex *worm worm *Skorpis *scorpion scorpion *Solam' *locust bald locust *Spongos *sponge sponge *Stronthios *sparrow sparrow *Sus *horse horse *Sus *swallow crane *Susah' *mare mare *Tachash *seal badger *Tachmas' *ostrich night-hawk *Tan *jackal dragon *Tannim' *crocodile dragon *Tannin' *sea-monster whale, etc *Tekeleth *sea-shell blue: *Teo' *antelope wild ox *Tinshemeth *lizard chameleon *Tinshemeth *heron swan *To *antelope wild ox *Tola' *cochineal crimson, etc *Tor *dove turtle-dove *Tragos *he-goat goat *Trugon *dove turtle-dove *Tsab *lizard tortoise *Tsabua *hyena speckled *Tsebi' *(male) gizelle deer *Tsebiyah' *(female) gazelle roe *Tselatsal' *cricket locust *Tsepha *basilisk cockatrice *Tsephardea *frog frog *Tsippor' *little bird sparrow *Tsirah *fly hornet *Tsiyim' *wild beasts beasts of the desert *Tukkiyim *peacocks peacocks *Yaalah' *(female) ibex roe *Yaanab' *(female) ostrich owl *Yachmur' *oryx fallow deer *Yail' *(male) ibex wild goat *Yaen' *(male) ostrich ostrich *Yanshuph*, or bittern owl *Yelek *hairy locust cankerworm, *Yon ah' *dove dove *Zebub' *fly fly *Zeeb' *wolf wolf *Zemer *gazelle chamois
ZOPF, JOHANN HEINRICH Zopf, Johann Heinrich

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zopf, Johann Heinrich a German theological writer, who lived in the 18th century, is the author of, *Introductio ad Lectionem Veteris Testamenti, *etc. (Leipsic, 1763): — Josephus, *Zeuqniss von Jesu Christo *(ibid. 1759 ): — *Quadriga Dissertt.: 1. De Versione lxx. quos Vocant, Interpretum; *2. *De Serpente Protoplastorum Seductore, *etc. (ibid. 1763): — *Introductio in Antiquitates Sacras Veterums Ebraeorum *(Halle, 1734): — *Diss. de Jephtae in Filiamn Mitigata Credulitate, *etc. (Essen, 1730): — *Diss. de Pseudo-Samuelis ex* 1 *Samuel c. *28 (ibid. 1747): — *Compendium Grammaticae Hebraeae Danziance *(ibid. 1748). See Furst, *Bibl. Jud. *3:555. (B.P.)
ZOPHAH Zophah

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zo'phah (*Heb. Tsophach', *צוֹפִח [in pause. צוֹפָח], a cruse [Gesen.]; Sept. Ζωφά v.r. Ζωφάρ and Ζωχάθ; *Vulg. Supha*)*, *an Asherite, first named of the four sons Hof Heiam or Hotham (1Ch 7:35 comp; ver. 32), and fathers of many sons (ver. 36). B.C. cir. 1618*.*
ZOPHAI Zophai

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zo'phai (Heb; *Tsophay', *צוֹפִי *', *patronymic; from *Zuph *[Fürst]; Sept. Ζουφί; Vulg. Sophat), a Kohathite Levite, son of Elkanah and father of Nahath (1Ch 6:26 [Heb. 11]); elsewhere (ver. 35) called simply ZUPH *SEE ZUPH *(q.v.).
ZOPHAR Zophar

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zophar (Heb. *Tsohar *צוֹפִר, *sparrow, *[Gesen.] or *shaggy *[Fuirst]; Sept. Ζωφα; Vulg. *Sophar*)*, *the last named of Job's three friends and opponents in argument (Job 2:11; Job 11:1; Job 20:1; Job 42:9). B.C. cir. 2000. He is called a Naamathite, or inhabitant of Naamah, a place whose situation is unknown, as it could not be the Naamah mentioned in Jos 15:41. Wemyss, in his *Job and his Times *(p. 111), well characterizes this interlocutor: "Zophar exceeds the other two, if possible, in severity of censure; He is the most inveterate of the accusers, and, speaks without feeling, or pity. He does little more than repeat and exaggerate the arguments of Bildad. He unfeelingly alludes (Job 11:15) to the effects of Job's disease as appearing in his countenance. This is cruel and invidious. Yet in the same discourse how nobly does he treat-of the divine, attributes, showing that any inquiry into then is far beyond the grasp of the human mind! And though them hortatory part of the first discourse bears some resemblance to that of Eliphaz, yet it is diversified by the fine imagery which he employs. He seems to have had a full conviction of the providence of God as regulating and controlling the actions of men; but he limits all his reasonings to the present life, and makes no reference to a future world. This circumstance alone accounts for the weakness and fallacy of; these men's judgments. , In his second discourse there is much poetical beauty in the selection of images, and the general doctrine is founded, in truth; its fallacy: lies in its application to Job's peculiar case. The whole indicates great warmth of temper, inflamed by misapprehension of its object and by mistaken zeal." It is to be observed that Zophar has but two speeches, whereas the others have three each. When Job had replied, (ch. 26-31) to the short address of Bildad (ch. 25), a rejoinder might have been expected from Zophar; but he said nothing, the three friends, by, common consent, then giving up the contest in despair (32, 1). *SEE JOB*.
ZOPHIM Zophim

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zo'phim (Heb. *Tsophim', *צוֹפַים [briefly צפַים. in Numbers], *watchers, *as often; but Fürst thinks, *fertile*), the name either in whole or part of two places in Palestine. **1. **(Sept σκοπιάν; Vlg. *sublimis.*) The designation of a field (שָׂדֶה) or spot on or near the top of Pisgah, from which Balaam, had his second view of the encampment of Israel (Numbers '23, 14). If the word *sadeh *("field") may be taken in its usual sense, then the "field of Zophim" was a cultivated spot high up on the top of the range of Pisgah. But that word is the almost invariable term for a portion of the upper district of Moab, and therefore may have had some local sense which: has hitherto escaped notice, and in which it is employed in reference. to .he spot in question. The position of the fieldof Zophi m is not defined; it is only said that it commanded merely a portion of the encampment of Israel. Neither do the ancient versions afford any clew. The Targum of Onkelos, the Sept., and the Peshito-Syriac take Zophim in the sense of "watchers" or "lookers out" and translate it accordingly. But it is probably a Hebrew version of *an *aboriginal n ame, related to that which, in other places of the present records, appears as Mizpehi or Mizpah. Mount Nebo, or Pisgah, is now undoubtedly identified as Jebel Neba; near Hesban. *SEE NESO*. De Saulcy appears to have even heard the ancient name given to it by the Bedawin (*Voyage en Tere Sainte,* 1, 289). Along its eastern side, and reaching from the ruins of Maan to Hesban, is a plateau of arable land, still cultivated in part by the Arabs, which appears to be the place in question (Portner *Handbook for Palestine; *p. 300.). In this view Tristram at length concurs (*Bible Places, *p. 346). Prof Paine, of the American Exploring Party, regards it as *Wady Haisa, *on the south east of Jebel Neba. *SEE PISGAH*. **2. **(Sept. Σωφίμ v; r. Σιφά; Vulg. *Sophim.*) Ramathaim-zophim was Samuel's birthplace (1Sa 1; 1Sa 1). 'The dual form of the first term, according to some, signifies one of the two Ramahs: to wit, that of the, Zophites (Lightfoot, 2, 162, ed. 1832); and the second term, according to others, means *speculatores, *i.e. *prophets, *and denoting that at this place was a school of the prophets a hypothesis supported by the Chaldee paraphrast, who renders it "Elkanah, a man of Ramatha, a disciple of the prophets." Others find in the dual form of *Ramthaim *a reference to the shape of the city, which was built on the sides of two hills; and in the word Zophim see an allusion to some watch-towers, or places of observation, which the high situation of the city might favor (Clerici *Opera, *2, 175). Others, again, affirm that the word *Zophim *is added because Ramah or Ramatha: was inhabited by a clan of Levites of the family of *Zuph *(Calmet, s.v.). Winer asserts (*Realwort. *art. "Samuel") that the first verse of the book declares Samuel to be an Ephraimite. This term, however, if the genealogy in Chronicles remain undisturbed, must signifyl not an Ephraimite by birth, but by abode. We find that the Kohathites, to whom Samuel belonged, had their lot in Mount Ephraim (Jos 21:5-20), where not the hill of' Ephraim is meant, but the hill country of Ephraim (Gesenius, *Thesaur. s.v.*). The family of Zoph, living in the hill country of Ephra1m, might be termed Ephrathite, while their ancestor's name distinguished their special locality as Ramathaim zophim. The geography of this place has been disputed. *SEE RAMAH*. Eusebius and Jerome confound it with Arimathsa of the New Test. (*Onomast. *art. "Armatha Sophim"). The Sept. renders it Α᾿ρμαθαὶμ Σωφίμ, Cod. A, or Cod. B,'Α᾿ρμαθὶμ Σιφά 2.0a. For an account of the place now, and for long called Neby Samwl, and the impossibility of its being the ancient Ramah, see Robinson, *Palestine, *2, 141; and for an interesting discussion as to the site of Ramath-zophim, the latter name being yet retained in the Arabic term Sobah, the curious reader may consult the same work (p. 830), or *Biblioth. Sacra *(p. 46). The hilly range of Ephraim extended southward into other cantons, while it bore its original name of Mount Ephraim; — and so the inhabitants of Ramathaim-zophim might be termed Ephrathites, just as Mahlon and Chilion are called "Ephrathites of Bethlehem-judah" (Ru 1:2). *SEE RAMATHAIM; SEE ZUPH*.
ZORABABEL Zorababel

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zorab'abel (Ζοροβάεβλ)*, *the Greek form (1 Esd. 4:13; 5:5-70; 6:2-29; Ecclus. 49:11; Mt 1:12-13; Lu 3:27) of the name of Zerubbabel (q.v.)
ZORAH Zorah

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zorah (Heb. *Tsorah', *צָרעָה*, hornet; *Sept. Σαραά v.r. Σοράθ, Σαράλ, Σαρά*,* etc.; Josephus, Σαρασά*, Ant. *5, 8, 12; Vulg. *Saraa; *A. V. "Zareah," Ne 11:29; "Zoreah," Jos 15:33), one of the towns near the border of the tribe of Dan (Jos 19:41), but really within-the limits of Judah, being in the north-western corner of the "valley district" (Jos 15:33). It is almost always mentioned in connection with Eshtaol (see also Jg 13:25; Jg 16:31; Jg 18:2,8,11; and comp. 1Ch 2:53). Zorah was the residence of Manoah and the native place of Samson. The place both of his birth and his burial is specified with a curious minuteness as "between Zorah and Eshtaol," "in Mahaneh-Dan" (Jg 13:25; Jg 11:31). In the genealogical records of 1 Chronicles (1Ch 2:53; 1Ch 4:2) the "Zareathites and Eshtaulites" are given as descended from (i.e. colonized by) Kirjathjearim. Zorah is mentioned among the places fortified by Rehoboam (2Ch 11:10) and it was re-inhabited by the men of Judah after the return from the Captivity (Ne 11:29). In the *Onomasticon *(*s.v. *Σαρδά and "Saara") it is mentioned as living some ten miles north of Eleutheropolis on the road to Nicopolis. By the Jewish traveler Hap-Parchi (Zunz, *Benjamin of Tud. *2, 441) it is specified as three hours south-east of Lydd. These notices agree in direction though in neither is the distance nearly sufficient with the modern village of *Sur'ah *which has been visited by Robinson (*Bibl. Res. *3; 153); and Toblern (Dritte Wanzd. p.a18-183). It lies just below the brow of, a sharp pointed conical hill at the shoulder of the ranges which there meet, and form the north side of the Wady Ghurab, the northernmost of the two branches which unite just below, Sir'ah, and form the great wady Surar. Near it are to be seen the remains of Zanoah, Bethshemesh, Timnai, there and other places more or less frequently mentioned with it in the narrative. Eshtaol, however, has not yet been identified. The position of Sir'ah at the entrance of the valley, which forms one of the inlets from the great low land, explains its fortification by Rehoboam. The spring is a short distance below the village" "a noble fountain" this was at the end of April "walled up square with large hewn stones and gushing over with fine water. As we passed on," continues Robinson, with a more poetical tone than is his wont, "we overtook no less than twelve women toiling upwards to the village, each with her; jar of water on her head. The village, the fountain, the fields, the mountain the females bearing water, all transported us back to ancient times, when in all probability the mother of Samson often in like manner visited the fountain and toiled homeward with her jar of water. See also Schwarz, *Palestine, p. *102; Thomson, *Land and Book,* 2, *361*; Porter*, Handbook for Pal. *p. 285; Tristram, *Bible Places, *p. 468. *Consider Tent Work. *1, 274.
ZORATHITE Zorathite

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zo'rathite (Heb. *Tsorathi', *צָרעָתַי, patronymic from *Zorah; *Sept. Σαραθί v.r. Α᾿ραθί*; *Vulg. *Sorathi; *A.V. "Zorathites"), a designation of the inhabitants of *Zorah *(q.v.), mentioned in 1Ch 4:2 as descended from Shobal, one of the sons of Judah, who in 2, 52 is stated to have founded Kirjath jearim, from which again "the Zareathites and the Eshtaulites" were colonized. *SEE ZAREATHITE; SEE ZORITE*.
ZOREAH Zoreah

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zo'reah (Jos 15:33). *SEE ZORAH*.
ZORITE Zorite

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zo'rite (Heb. *Tsori', *צָרעַי, a patronymic; Sept. Σαραϊv v.r. ῾Ησαρί*; *Vulg. *Sarai; *A.V. "Zorites"), the designation apparently of the inhabitants of Zorah (q v.), mentioned in 1Ch 2:54 as descended from Salma the brother of Shobal, and hence classed with the descendants of the latter the "Zareathites and the Eshtaulites" (ver. 53).
ZORN, PETER Zorn, Peter

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zorn, Peter a German theological writer, was born at Hamburg, May 22, 1682. In 1715 he was called as rector to Plon, in Holstein; in 1725 became professor of history, in 1729 that of Church history at the gymnasium in Stettin, and died at Thorn, January 23, 1746. He published, *De Scholis Publicis quas Antiqui Judaei Prope Lacuum, Amn. et Fluviorum Crepidinibus, *etc., *Exstruxerunt *(*Act*. 16:13) (Ploense, 1716): — *De Epithalamiis sive Carminibus Veterum Hebraeorum Nuptialibus *(Hamburg, s.a.): — *De Antiquis AEnigmatibus in Coenis Nuptialibus Hebraeorum, Graecorum et Romanorum *(Leipsic, 1724): — *Historia Bibliorum ex Hebraeorum Diebus Festis et Jejuniis lllustrata, *etc. (ibid. 1741): — *Diss. de Baptismo Proselytor. Judaico Sacrament. V.T. juxta Lightfootum *(ibid. 1703): — *Hecataei Abderitae Eclogae *(Altona, 1730): — *Historia Fisci Judaici sub Imperio Veterum Romanorum *(ibid. 1734). See Furst, *Bibl. Jud. *3:555; Winer, *Handbuch der theol. Lit. *1:32, 140, 632, 899. (B.P.)
ZOROASTER Zoroaster

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zoroaster (more correctly *Zarathustra, *which in Greek and Latin was corrupted into *Zarastrades *and *Zoroastres, *while the Persians and Parsees changed it into *Zerdusht) *was the founder of the Parsee religion. The original meaning of the word was probably that of "chief," "senior," "high-priest," and it was a common designation of a spiritual guide and head of a district or province. Indeed, the founder of Zoroastrianism is hardly ever mentioned woithout his family name *Spitima. *He was a native of Bactria. He applied to himself the terms *Manthran *(reciter of "Manthras"), a messenger sent by Ahura- Mazda, or a *speaker, *one who listens to the voice of oracles given by the spirit of nature, one who receives sacred words from Ahura-Mazda through the flames. His life is covered with obscurity. The accounts of him are legendary and unhistorical. In the Zend writings he is to a great extent represented, not as a historical, but as a dogmatical personality, vested with superhuman, or even divine, powers, standing next to God. His temptations by the devil, whose empire was threatened by him, form the subject of many traditional stories and legends. He is represented as the fountain of all wisdom and truth, and the master of the whole living creation. One of the prayers of the Fravardiul Yasht declares — "We worship the rule and the guardian angel of Zarathustra Spitima, who first thought good thoughts, who first spoke good words, who first performed good actions who was the first priest, the first warrior, the first cultivator of the soil, the first prophet, the first who was inspired, the first who has given to mankind nature, and reality, and word, and hearing of word, and wealth, and all good things created by Mazda, which embellish reality; who first caused the wheel to turn among gods and men, who first praised the purity of the living creation and destroyed idolatry, who confessed the Zarathustrian belief in Ahura-Mazda, the religion of the living God against the devils.... Through him the whole true and revealed word was heard, which is the life and guidance of the world.... Through his knowledge and speech the waters become desirous of growing; through his knowledge and speech all beings created by the Holy Spirit are uttering words of happiness." In the older Yasna alone he appears like a living reality, a man acting a great and prominent part, both in the history of his country and that of mankind. **I. ***History. *— Zoroaster's father seems to have been called Purusbaspa, and his daughter, the only one of his children mentioned, Puruchista. But the time when he lived remains very obscure. He is usually said to have flourished in the reign of a king Gushtasp, who has, on apparently sufficient grounds, been identified with the Darius Hystaspis of the classical writers (Malcolm, *Hist. of Persia, *1:234). The dates generally given are as follows: Xanthos of Lydia places him about six hundred years before the Trojan war; Aristotle and Eudoxus place him six thousand years before Plato; others, again, five thousand years before the Trojan war. Berosus, a Babylonian historian, makes him a Babylonian king, and the founder of a dynasty which reigned over Babylon between 2200 and 2000 B.C. .The Parsees place him at the time of Hystaspes, the father of Darius, whom they identify with a king mentioned in the Shah-Nameh, from whom, however, Hystaspes is wholly distinct. This account would place Zoroaster at about 550 B.C. Yet there is scarcely a doubt that he must be considered as belonging to a much earlier age, not later than 1000 B.C. It is almost certain that Zoroaster was one of the Sosbyantos, or five priests, with whom the religious reform first arose, which he boldly carried out. The Aryans seem to have originally led a nomad life, until some of them, reaching, in the course of their migrations, lands fit for permanent settlements, settled down into agriculturists. Bactria and the parts between the Oxus and the Jaxartes seem to have attracted them most. The Iranians became gradually estranged from their brother tribes, who adhered to their ancient nomad life, and by degrees came to consider those peaceful settlements a fit prey for their depredations and inroads. The hatred thus engendered and nourished soon came to include all and everything belonging to those devastators — even their religion, originally identical with that of their own. The Deva religion became, in their estimation, the source of all evil. Moulded into a new form, styled the Ahura religion, the old elements were much more changed than was the case when Judaism became Christianity. Generation after generation further added and took away, until Zarathustra, with the energy and the clear eye that belongs to exalted leaders and founders of religions, gave to that which had originally been a mere reaction and spite against the primitive Brahminic faith a new and independent life, and forever fixed its dogmas, not a few of which sprang from his own brain. **II. ***Doctrines*. — Zoroaster is commonly spoken of as the great reformer of the Magian system after it had suffered corruption; but it would be more correct to say that on the primitive dualistic worship pf the Persians he superinduced some notions borrowed from the element-worship, with which Magism at a later period coalesced. His doctrines, as far as they call be gathered from the extant fragments of the Zend-Avesta, especially the Vendidad Sade, and from the *Ulemai Islan *(a treatise on the Parsee doctrine by an Arabic writer, supposed to belong to the 6th or 7th century of our mera), relate principally to theology and ethics, with occasional references to questions of a cosmological and physiological character. The problem of the world in relation to God he answers by reference to the antithesis of light and darkness, good and evil; all things, according to him, consist in the mingling of antitheses. His primary physical principle is the *Zerwane Akerene, *the Endless Time (with which may be compared the τὸ ἄπειρον of Anaximander; see Arist. *Physic. *1:4, 5; 3:4-7). Everything else save time has been made. The original spiritual power was Ormuzd, the luminous, the pure, the fragrant, devoted to good and capable of all good. Gazing into the abyss, he beheld, afar off, Ahriman, black, unclean, unsavory, the evil-doer. He was startled at the sight, and thought within, himself, I must put this enemy out of the way; and set himself to use the fit means for this end. All that Ormuzd accomplished was by the help of Time. After the lapse of twelve hundred years the heavens and paradise were made, and the twelve signs which mark the heavens were fixed there. Each sign was formed in one thousand years. After the first three were formed, Ahriman arose to make war on Ormuzd, but failing of success he returned to his gloomy abode, and remained there for other three thousand years, during which the work of creation advanced, and three other signs were made. During this period the earth and the sea were also formed, man was created, and plants and animals produced. Again Ahriman assailed heaven with all his: might, but failing in this, he attacked the world. He afflicted Kajumert, the first man, with a thousand plagues till he was destroyed; but was himself taken and driven into hell through the same opening by which he had come into the world.. In man there is much of Ormuzd and much of Ahriman: in his body are fire, water, earth, and air; he has also soul, understanding, judgment, a *ferver *("principe des sensations," Anquetil), and five senses. By the soul are moved all the members we possess, and without the soul we are nothing. All these he has from Ormuzd. From Ahriman he has desire, need, envy, hatred, impurity, falsehood, and wrath. When a man dies, the four elements of which his body is composed mingle with the four primitive elements; his soul, understanding, and judgment unite with the ferver, and all become one. In this state man goes to judgment, and according as his good works or his bad works have preponderated during life, he is rewarded with immortality in paradise, or punished by being cast into hell. During life he is in constant conflict with the Dews or Divas, a class of beings possessing a body formed of the four elements beings essentially evil, and who tempt men to sin but at the resurrection they shall be annihilated, and all men at last shall be received into paradise. Even Ahriman himself shall be accepted and blessed; for the Dews are gradually abstracting from him the evil and darkness that are in him, so that at last he shall be left pure and bright (see Hyde, *Hist. Rel. Vet. Pers. *[Oxon. 1700]; Anquetil du Perron, *Zend-Avesta *[Par. 1771, 3 volumes, 4to]; Vullers, *Fragmente uber die Rel. des Zoroaster *[Bonn, 1831]). It is chiefly from the Gathas, however, that Zarathustra's real theology, unmutilated by later ages, can be learned. His leading idea was monotheism. While the five priests before him, the Sosbyantos, worshipped a plurality of good spirits called Ahuras, as opposed to the Indian Devas, he reduced this plurality to unity. This one supreme being he called Ahuru- Mazda, or the creator of the universe-the Auramazda of the cuneiform inscriptions of the Achemenidian kings, the Ahurmazd of Sassanian times, and the Hormazd, or Ormuzd, of the modern Parsees. This supreme god is, by Zoroaster, conceived to be "the creator of the earthly and spiritual life, the lord of the whole universe, at whose hands are all the creatures." Ahura-Mazda is to Zoroaster the light and the source of light. He is wisdom and intellect; he possesses all good things, temporal and spiritual, among them the good mind, immortality, wholesomenesss, the best truth, devotion, piety, and abundance of all earthly good. All these gifts he grants to the pious man who is pure in thought, word, and deed. He rewards the good and punishes the wicked; and all that is created, good or evil, fortune or misfortune, is his work alone. Nothing was further from Zoroaster's mind than to assume anything but one supreme being, one and indivisible. But the great problem of the ages, the origin of evil and its incompatibility with God's goodness, holiness, and justice, he attempted to solve by assuming two primeval causes, which, though different, were united, and produced the world of the material things as well as that of the spirit. The one who produced the *reality *is called Vohu-Mano, the good mind; the other, through whom the *non- reality *originated, is the Akem -Mano, the evil mind. To the former belong all good, true, and perfect things; to the second, all that is delusive, bad, wicked. These two aboriginal moving causes of the universe are called twins. They are spread everywhere, in God as in man. When united in Ahura-Mazda they are called Spento-Manyus and Angro-Manyus, i.e., white or holy, and dark or evil, spirit. It is only in later writings that these two are supposed to stand opposed to each other in the relation of God and devil. The inscriptions of Darius know but one God, without any adversary whatsoever. But while the one side within him produced all that is bright and shining, all that is good and useful in nature, the other side produced all that is dark and apparently noxious. Both are as inseparable as day and night, and, though opposed to each other, are indispensable for the preservation of creation. The bright spirit appears in the blazing flame, the presence of the dark is marked by the wood converted into charcoal. The one has created the light of the day, the other the darkness of the light; the former awakens men to their duty, the other lulls them to sleep. Life is produced by the one and extinguished by the other, who also, by releasing the soul from the fetters of the body, enables her to go up to immortality. *SEE DUALISM*. Thus the original monotheism of Zoroaster did not last long. False interpretations, misunderstandings, changes, and corruptions crept in, and dualism was established in theology. The two principles then, for the first time, became two powers, hostile to each other, each ruling over a realm of his own, and constantly endeavoring to overthrow the other. Hence monotheism was, in later times, broken up and superseded by dualism. But a small party, represented by the Magi, remained steadfast to the old doctrine, as opposed to that of the followersof the efalse interpretation, or Zend, the Zendiks. In order to prove their own interpretation of Zoroaster's doctrines they had recourse to a false and ungrammatical explanation of the term Zervana Akarana, which, merely meaning time without bounds, was by them pressed into an identity with the Supreme Being; while the passages on which the present Parsee priests still rest their faulty interpretation, simply indicate that God created in the boundless time, or that he is from eternity, self-existing, neither born nor created. The following is a brief summary of the principal doctrines of Zoroaster, drawn from certain passages from the Gathas, which probably emanated from Zoroaster himself. **1. **Everywhere in the world a duality is to be perceived, such as the good and the evil, light and darkness; this life and that life, human wisdom and divine wisdom. **2. **Only this life becomes a prey to death, but not that hereafter, over which the destructive spirit has no power. **3. **In the universe there are, from the beginning, two spirits at work, the one making life, the other destroying it. **4. **Both these spirits are accompanied by intellectual powers, representing the ideas of the Platonic system on which the whole moral world rests. They cause the struggle between good and evil, and all the conflicts of the world, which end in the final victory of the good principle. **5. **The principal duty of man in this life is.to obey the word and commandments of God. **6. **Disobedience is punished with the death of the sinner. **7. **Ahura-Mazda created the idea of the good, but is not identical with it. This idea produced the good mind, the Divine Spirit, working in man and nature, and devotion — the obedient heart. **8. **The Divine Spirit cannot be resisted. **9. **Those who obey the word of God will he free from all defects and immortal. **10. **God exercises his rule in the world through the works prompted by the Divine Spirit, who is working in man and nature. **11. **Men should pray to God and worship him. He hears the prayers of the good. **12. **All men live solely through the bounty of God. **13. **The soul of the pure will hereafter enjoy everlasting life; that of the wicked will have to undergo everlasting punishment, or as modern Parsee theologians explain, to the day of the resurrection. **14. **All creatures are Ahura-Mazda's. **15. **He is the reality of the good mind, word, and deed. **III. ***Literature*. — Haug, *Essays on the Sacred Language, Writings, and Religion of the Parsees *(Bombay, 1862); Spiegel, *Evanische Aterthumskunde *(Leipsic, 1871-78, 3 volumes); Darmsteter, *Ormuzd et Ahriman *(Paris, 1877); Ursinus, *De Zoroastre *(Nuremberg, 1661); Mulert, *De Nomine et Vita Zoroastris *(Wittenberg, 1707); Clarke, *Ten Great Religions *(Boston, 1871); Hardwick, *Christ and Other Masters *(London, 1855-57; 2d ed. 1863); Muller, *Chips from a German Workshop *(Index). See also the following with the references under them: *SEE AHRIMAN; SEE GUEBERS; SEE MAGI; SEE ORMUZD; SEE PARSEES; SEE ZEND-AVESTA*.
ZORPHI Zorphi

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zor'phi (Heb. with the art. *hats-Tsorephi', *הִצֹּרפַי; Sept. τοῦ Σαρεφί*; *Vulg. *aurificis; *A.V. "the goldsmith ") is a marginal suggestion in Ne 3:31, for the name of the father of Malchiah, as if a proper name, but probably without good reason.
ZOSIMUS Zosimus

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zosimus pope in A.D. 417418, successor to Innocent I, was by birth a Greek and is noteworthy as a participant in the doctrinal controversies of his time, in which he first endorsed and then rejected doctrines regarded as heretical, and also for his assertion of authority and his energetic labors in behalf of the supremacy of the Roman see. He countermanded the condemnation of Pelagius and Coelstids, denounced by Innocent and the African synods; and in a letter to bishop Aurelius of Carthage and others he censured the treatment they had received declared them orthodox, and warned the bishops against, sophistries in speculation. He also cited before his bar Paulinus, the accuser of Pelagius. The African bishops however, held another synod 418, which defined their course and censured Zosimuis for a reopening a settled case, besides forbidding the departure of Paulinus for Rome. Zosimus, endeavored to fortify his position by a reference to the ecclesiastical authority derived by his see from Peter; but when tithe, Africans obtained a *sacrum rescriptum *against the Pelagians from the emperor Hoisorius, he gave way, and, for his art pronounced the condemnation of Pelagius and Coelestius in an *Epistola Tractatoria. *This time he was opposed by eighteen Italian bishops whom he at once declared deposed. The deposition of the presbyter Apiarius of Sicca, in Numidiaand his appeal to Zosimus against his bishop, Urbaitus, led to fresh disputes with the Africans. Zosimus refused to recognize the deposition, and sent three delegates to a synod convened at Garthage to demand the restoration of Apiarius. Zosimus also interfered in the affairs of the Gallican bishops by appointing bishop Patroclus of Arelate his vicar in Gaul, and conferring upon him the rights of metropolitan over the province of Vienne. His course excited much opposition; but death put an end to his plans for aggrandizement in 418. See Schröckh, *Kirchengesch. *(Leips. 1782), 8:148 sq.; Gieseler, *Kirchengesch. *(*4th ed. *Bonn. 1845), 1, 2, 111 sq. — Herzog, *Real Encyklop. s.v.*
ZOUCH, THOMAS, DD Zouch, Thomas, Dd

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zouch, Thomas, D.D. a learned English divine, was born at Sandal, near Wakefield, Yorkshire, in 1737. He was educated at Wakefield School and at Trinity College, Cambridge, where he graduated in 1761. He became a fellow of his college in 1763, and was appointed assistant tutor. In 1770 he became rector of Wycliffe, in the North Riding of Yorkshire, where he remained until 1793. In 1791 he was appointed deputy commissary of the archdeaconry of Richmond, and in 1793 was chaplain to the Master of the Rolls and rector of Scrayingham. By the death of his elder brother, the Rev. Henry Zouch, in 1795, he succeeded to an estate at Sandal, where he resided until his death. He became prebendary of Durham in 1805; declined the bishopric of Carlisle in 1808; and died in 1816. He was the author *of, The Crucifixion *(Canterbury, 1765), a Seaton prize poem: *— An inquiry into the Prophetic Character of the Romans as Described in Daniel *8:23-25 (1792): — *Memoirs of the Life and Writings of Sir Philip Sidney *(York, 1808): — and other works. See Chalmers, *Biog. Dict. *s.v.; Allibone, *Dict. of Brit and Amer. Auth. *s.v.
ZSCHOKKE, JOHANN HEINRICH DANIEL Zschokke, Johann Heinrich Daniel

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zschokke, Johann Heinrich Daniel a German writer, was born at Magdeburg, March 22, 1771. He was erratic in his early youth, but studied at the University of Frankfort-on-the-Oder, and although proficient in philosophy, history, and mathematics, was refused a position as professor on account of his opposition to the government. Leaving Prussia, therefore, he travelled through Germany and Framice, and settled in Switzerland as a teacher, but the French revolution compelled him to take refuge in Aarau, where he played an active part in those times. He died there, January 22, 1848. His later productions were chiefly poetical and historical, many of them novels. His best known is *Stunden der Andacht *(1806; twice trans]. in English, *Meditations on Death)*; but, as might be expected from his career, it is neither profound nor inspiring. His collected works were published at Aarau (1825, 40 volumes, 8vo). See Hoefer, *Nouv. Biog. Generale, *s.v.
ZUAR Zuar

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zu'ar (Heb. *Tsuar', *צוּעִר*, littleness; *Sept. Σωράρ*; *Vulg. *Suar*)*, *the father of Nethaneel, which latter was the chief of the tribe of Issachar at the time of the Exode (Nu 1:8; Nu 2:5; Nu 7:18,23; Nu 10:15). B.C. ante 1658.
ZUBLY, JOHN JOACHIM, DD Zubly, John Joachim, Dd

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zubly, John Joachim, D.D. a Presbyterian divine, was born at St. Gall, Switzerland, Aug. 27,1724. He was ordained to the ministry Aug. 19, 1744; took charge of the Independent Presbyterian Church of Savannah, Ga., in 1760; and was a delegate from Georgia to the Constitutional Congress in 1775-76, but opposed separation from England, and returned to Savannah, which i his unpopularity forced him to leave. He died July 23, 1781. Dr. Zubly was a man of great learning and unaffected piety, devoted to his call as a preacher of the Gospel, and zealous for the success of his labors. He published, *The Real Christians Hope in Death, *etc. (Charlestown, 1756, 12mo), with a Preface by the Rev. Richard *Clarke: — Sermon on the Repeal of the Stamp Act *(Savannah, 1766, 8vo)*: — Amenable Inquiry into the Nature of the Dependency of the American Colonies upon the Parliament of Great Britain, and the Right of Parliament to Lay Taxes on the said Colonies, by a Freeholder of South Carolina *(1769, 4to): *— Sermon on the Value of that Faith without which it is Impossible to Please God *(1772): *— Sermon on the Death of Rev. John Osgood, of Midway *(*1773*)*: — The Law of Liberty *(Phila. 1775; 8ro;, Lond. eod. 8vo; Phila. 1778, 8vo), a sermon on American affairs. See. Allibone, *Dict. of Brit and Amer. Authors, *s.v.; Sprague, *Annals of the Amer. Pulpit, *3, 219; *London Monthly Review, *Feb. 1776, p. 167; *Georgia Analytic Repository, *1, 49. (J. L. S.)
ZUBLY, JOHN JOACHIM, DD (2) Zubly, John Joachim, Dd (2)

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zubly, John Joachim, D.D. a Presbyterian minister, was born about the year 1730. In 1775 he took an active part in political matters, and was selected as one of the Georgia delegates to the Continental Congress at Philadelphia. The Georgia divine did not prove loyal to the Whig side, and a correspondence of his with the royal governor of the state having been discovered, he was compelled to resign his position in Congress, and subsequently his property was forfeited under the Confiscation Act. He died at Savannah, before the war ended, in July 1781. He is said to have been "a man of great learning, of vigorous and penetrating mind." See Sabine, *Royalists in the Rev. War, *2:467. (J.C.S.)
ZUCKRIGL, JAKOB Zuckrigl, Jakob

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zuckrigl, Jakob a Roman Catholic theologian of Austria, was born July 26, 1807, at Grossolkowitz, in Moravia. In 1831 he received holy orders, in 1837 was appointed professor of Christian religious philosophy and university- preacher in Vienna, and in 1847 the Freiburg University honored him with the doctorate of divinity. In 1848 he was called to the chair of apologetics, theological encyclopedia, and philosophy at Tubingen, where he died, June 9, 1876. He wrote, *Wissenschaftliche Rechtfertigung der christl. Trinitatslehre, *etc. (Vienna, 1846): — *Die Nothwendigkeit der christl. Offenbarungsmoral *(Tubingen, 1850). Besides, he contributed largely to the *Tubingen Theological Quarterly, *the *Freiburger Kirchenlexikon, *and the *Bonner theologiscne Literaturblatt. *See *Literarischer Handweiser,* 1867, page 1; 1876, page 288; Zuchold, *Bibl. Theol. *2:1503. (B.P.)
ZULU VERSION OF THE SCRIPTURES Zulu Version of the Scriptures

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zulu Version Of The Scriptures In this language, which is vernacular to the Kaffres, a translation of the New Test. has existed since 1869. It was published by the aid of the American Bible Society. It was formerly supposed that the analogies and general principles subsisting between the Kaffre and Zulu dialects were so proximate that one translation would meet the wants of the two tribes. This idea has been relinquished, and a translation was prepared by American missionaries to provide the Word of God for, a million of benighted heathen. From the annual report of the British and Foreign Bible Society for 1879 we see that an edition of the New Test., slightly revised, but conforming to the society's rule, has been issued by the American Zulu Mission, and that this society has shared largely, as on former occasions, in the work. (B.P.)
ZUNZ, LEOPOLD Zunz, Leopold

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zunz, Leopold a famous Jewish writer, was born at Detmold, Germany, August 10, 1794. He studied at. Berlin, was in 1820 preacher at the new synagogue there, in 1835 at Prague, and in 1839 director of the Teacher's Seminary at Berlin. When that institution was closed, in 1850, Zunz retired to private life, devoting all his energies to the production of works which have made him famous in the republic of letters. Zunz died at Berlin, March 18,1886. He was a voluminous writer, and of his many works we especially mention *Lebensgeschichte des Salonso Jizchaki, genannt Raschi *(Lemberg, 1840): — *Die gottesdienstlichen Vortrage der Juden, historisch entwickelt *(Berlin, 1832): — *Zur Geschichte und Literatur *(1845): — *Die Synagogale Poesie des Mittelalters *(1855): — *Die Ritus des synagogalen: Gottesdienstes *(1859): — *Literaturgeschichte der synagogalen Poesie *(1865). His minor writings were issued under the title of *Gesammelte Schriften *(1875, 1876, 3 volumes). See Furst, *Bibl. Jud. *3:555-558; Morais, *Eminent Israelites of the 19th Century *(Philadelphia, 1880), page 360 sq. (B.P.)
ZUNZ, LEOPOLD PIIEINKARD Zunz, Leopold Piieinkard

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zunz, Leopold Piieinkard a Hebrew scholar, was born at Detmold, Germany, August 10, 1794. He was educated at the University of Berlin, and became rabbi of a synagogue there in 1820. After two years he organized a society for Jewish culture. One of its members was Heine. The society, however, soon broke up. In 1824-32 Zunz was director of the new Jewish Congregational School; in 1825-35 he edited the *Spener'sche Zeitung; *in 1835-39 was rabbi again at Prague; in 1839-50 director of the Normal Seminary in Berlin. He died March 21, 1886. His life was one of literary activity, and his works were many.
ZUPH Zuph

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zuph (Heb. *Tsuph, *צוּŠ*, honey-comb *[Gesen.] or *moist *[Fürst]; Sept. Σούφ v.r. Σώφ and Σούπ; but in 1Sa 9:5 Σίφ, apparently reading צַעŠ, *Tsiph, *as the text of the Heb there does), the name of a man and of a place. **1. **A Kohathite Levite, the son of Elkanah and father of Tohu, or Toah or Nahath in the ancestry of the prophet Samuel (1Sa 1:1; 1Ch 6:35 [Heb. 20]). B.C. cir. 1310. In the parallel passage (1Ch 6:26) he is called ZOPHAI. **2. **A district (אֶרֶ, *land*) at which Saul and his servant arrived after passing through those of Shalisha, of Shalim, and of the Benjamites (1Sa 9:5). It evidently contained the city in which they encountered Samuel (ver. 6), and that, again, if the conditions of the narrative are to be accepted, was certainly not far from the "tomb of Rachel," probably the spot to which that name is still attached, a short distance north of Bethlehem. The name Zuph is connected in a singular manner with Samuel. One of his ancestors (see above) was named Zuphl (1Sa 1:1; 1Ch 6:35) or Zophai (ver. 26), and his native place was called Ramathaim- zophim (1Sa 1:1). The name, too, in its various forms of Zophim, Mizpeh, Mizpah, Zephathah, was common in the Holy Land, on both sides of the Jordan. The only possible trace of the name of Zuph in modern Palestine, in any suitable locality, is to be found in *Soba, *a well known place about seven miles due west of Jerusalem, and five miles south-west of Naby Samwil. This Dr. Robinson (*Bibl. Res. *2, 8, 9) once proposed as the representative of Ramathaim-zophim; and although on topographical grounds he virtually renounces the idea (see the, foot-note to the same pages), yet those grounds need not similarly affect its identity with Zuph, provided other considerations do not interfere. If Shalim and Shalisha were to the north-east of Jerusalem, near Taiyibeh, then Saul's route to the land of Benjamin would be south or south-west, and pursuing the same direction lie would arrive at the neighborhood of Soba. But this is at the best no more than conjecture, and unless the land of Zuph extended a good distance east of Soba, the city in which the meeting with Samuel took place could hardly be sufficiently: near to Rachel's sepulcher. The signification of the name Zuph is too doubtful to be of use in identifying the place. Zophim is usually considered to signify watchmen or lookers-out, hence prophets, in which sense the author of the Targum has actually rendered 1Sa 9:5 "they came into the land in which was a prophet of Jehovah." Rabbi Schwarz regards the name Zuph as having the same root (from צָפָה*, to spy out*)*, *and thinks it denotes an eminence or look-out. He also (*Palest. p.* 156) ingeniously traces Saul's route, and seeks to identify "the land of Zuph" with Ramathaim-zophim itself. Wolcott (in the *Biblioth. Sacra, *1, 604) suggests that the city of *Ziph *(so the name reads in. the Kethib and Sept.) gave its name to this whole region; but this town was too far south for that. It is probable that the district in question was a wide one, at least from north to south, and extended from the hills of Ephiraim to the vicinity of Bethlehem. *SEE RAMAH*.
ZUR Zur

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zur (Heb. *Tsur, *צוּר*, *a *rock, *being substantially the same as the Heb. name of *Tyre *[q.v.]; Sept. Σούρ v.r. Ι᾿σούρ*; *Vulg. Sur), the name of two men. **1. **Third named of the five princes of Midian who were slain by the Israelites when Balaam fell (Nu 31:8). B.C. 1618. His daughter Cozbi was killed by Phinehas, together with: her paramour Zimri, the Simeonitish chieftain (Nu 25:15).. He appears to have been in some way subject to Sihon king of the Amorites (Jos 13:21). **2. **Second named of the eight sons of Jehiel (the founder of Gibeon) by his wife Maachah (1Ch 8:30; 1Ch 9:36). B.C. post 1612.
ZURICH LETTERS Zurich Letters

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zurich Letters is the name of an English publication of the Parker Society. On the accession of queen Mary, more than a thousand of the Reformers sought refuge on the Continent, and many of them settled in Zurich. On the return of the Zurich exiles to England, at the accession of Elizabeth, in 1558, they naturally maintained a correspondence with the minister and magistrates of Zurich, who had so kindly welcomed them and given them shelter. A portion of these letters have been published, and show the opinion of that time on subjects which afterwards produced such agitation. To these letters is added a letter of later date, written in 1590, by queen Elizabeth to the thirteen Swiss cantons; also a few letters from Peter Martyr, Bullinger, and Gualter, in reply to some of the English Reformers before mentioned.
ZURICH REFUGEES Zurich Refugees

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zurich Refugees *SEE ZURICH LETTERS*.
ZURIEL Zuriel

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zu'riel (Heb. *Tsuriel', *צוּרַיאֵל*, my rock *is *God; *Sept. Ζουριήλ; Vulg. *Suriel*)*, *the son of Abihail and chief of the Merarite Levites at the time of the Exode (Nu 3:35). B.C. 1658.
ZURISHADDAI Zurishaddai

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zurishad'dai (Heb. *Tsurishadday', *צוּרַישַׁדִּי *my rock *is the *Almighty-Zuriel *[comp. Ammishaddai in the context]; Sept. Σουρισαδαί*; *Vulg. *Surisaddai*)*, *the father of Shelumiel, which latter was chief of the tribe of Simeon at the time of the Exode (Nu 1:6; Nu 2:12; Nu 7:36,41; Nu 10:19). B.C. ante 1658.
ZUZIM Zuzim

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zu'zim (Heb. Only in the plur and with the art. *haz-Zuzim', *הִזּוּזַים*, the Zuzites; *Sept. translates ἔθνη ἰσχυρά*, *like Jerome in *Quaest. Heb. *"gentes fortes;" but the Vulg. has *Zuzim; *A.V. "the Zuzims"), the name of an ancient people, who, lying in the path of Chedorlaomer and his allies, were attacked and overthrown by them (Ge 14:5 only). Of the etymology or signification of the name nothing is known. The Sept., Targum of Onkelos, and Samar version (perhaps reading or mistaking for עֲזוּזים) render it "strong people." 'The Arabic' version of Saadiah (in Walton's *Polyglot*) gives *ed-Dahakin, *by which it is uncertain whether a proper name or an appellative is intended. Others understand by it "the wanderers" (Le Clerc, from זוּז) or "dwarfs" (Michaelis, *Suppl. *No. 606). Hardly more ascertainable is the situation which the Zuzim occupied. The progress of the invaders was from north to south. They first encountered the Rephaim in Ashteroth-karnaim (near the Leja, in the north of the Hauran); next the Zuzim in Ham; and next the Emim in Shaveh-kiriathaim. The last-named place has not been identified, but was probably not far north of the Arnon. There is therefore some plausibility in the suggestion of Ewald (*Gesch. *1, 308, note), provided it is etymologically correct, that Ham, הם is עם Am, i.e. Ammon; and thus that the Zuzim inhabited the country of the Ammonites, and were identical with the *Zamzummwim* (q.v.), who are known to have been exterminated and succeeded in. their land by the Ammonites. See *Journal of Sacred Literature, *Jan. 1852, p. 363. *SEE CANAANITE*.
ZWICK, JOHANN Zwick, Johann

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zwick, Johann preacher and Reformer in the city and region of Constance, Switzerland, was born about 1496. He studied theology and jurisprudence, being made doctor of laws at Padua, and priest about 1518. He then came under the influence of Luther and Zwingli, married, and entered on a pastorate at Riedlingen in 1522; from which he was expelled, on account of his evangelical tendencies, by the Nuremberg Diet of 1525. After a time he was associated with Ambrose Blarer as preacher, and in the conduct of the Reformation at Constance, which was brought to a successful consummation in 1531. Zwick was especially concerned with the settling of plans for the education of the young, and with the introduction of an order of discipline in the Church. After the completion of such labors, the preachers of Constance engaged in the work of extending the Reformation over surrounding regions in Wirtemberg and Switzerland, Blarer being prominent in such service, while Zwick was by that fact obliged to restrict his efforts to more limited areas. He gave twelve years of most arduous and exacting toil to the Church, and exhausted his entire patrimony before he applied to the council (1538) that provision might be made for his support. The union efforts of Bucer engaged the attention of Zwick in common with the Protestant clergy in general, but did not commend themselves to his judgment, though Luther's personality had somewhat impressed him at the Wittenberg Concord (May, 1536); and he thought that some concessions might be made to a man so eminent, especially since a meaning which the Swiss churches could endorse might be found in the great Reformer's doctrine of the bodily presence in the sacrament. He was eventually, however, constrained to see that no true agreement was possible upon this question; and his influence, joined with that of the other clergymen of Constance, gave to that city the unpleasant notoriety of being the only one which had not replied to Luther's agreement with Bucer. Zwick was also involved in the Schwenkfeldian disputes. He obtained possession of manuscripts written by Schwenkfeld, circulated them among friends, and aided in bringing the writings of Vadian against that agitator before the public. Zwick died as the clouds of the Smalcald war began looming in the distance. After being repeatedly unwell, he went to Bischoffszell, in Thurgvia, to minister to an orphaned congregation, in which the ravages of pestilence were carrying away from ten to thirty adults, and as many children, in each week to the grave. He was himself attacked, and lay for several weeks rejoicing in the triumphs of faith, and died Oct. 23,1542. Dr. Voegeli, the physician whom Constance had sent to care for her favorite preacher, came away from the sickbed, where, he said, he had learned how to die, and soon followed his friend into the other world. Zwick was constantly busy with his pen; but he preferred to publish the works of others rather than his own productions. He caused the publication of a *Latin-German New Testament *at Zurich in 1535, and wrote a preface for it. He also prepared a number of catechisms. His principal importance to literature lies, however, in the field of hymnology. He issued a hymn-book in. 1536 (?), and a second enlarged edition in 1540. A collection of Latin hymns and prayers for educated young people, entitled *Rhapsodie, *whose date and authorship were long unknown, has recently been found attributed to Zwick in a note of the .16th century written in the Zurich copy of the *Rhapsodie. *See Zwick, *Works *and *Letters, *generally unpublished; Schelhorn, *Sammlungen fir d. Geschichte,* 1, 41 sq.; the more recent biographies of Blarer; and Herzog, *Real- Encyklop. *s.v.
ZWICKAU PROPHETS Zwickau Prophets

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zwickau Prophets a local sect of fanatic Lutherans (A.D. 1521), who believed themselves to be the subjects of immediate inspiration. The leaders of the party were Nicholas Storch (q.v.), a weaver of Zwickau, Mark Thomas, of the same trade and place, Mark Stubner, a former student at Wittenberg, and Thomas Miinzer, Lutheran pastor of Zwickau, subsequently the rebel chief of the Anabaptist rebellion. These fanatics rejected the Bible, considered human learning a hinderance to religion, and predicted the overthrow of the existing governments to make way for the millennial reign of the saints (themselves). Storch declared that the angel Gabriel had appeared to him in a vision, saying to him, "Thou shalt sit on my throne;" and in anticipation of the new kingdom the prophets chose from the number of their followers twelve apostles and seventy evangelists. They drew after them a great many of the laboring classes and tradespeople; but when open sedition broke out, the magistrates drove the leaders out of Zwickau. *SEE ABECEDARIANS; SEE ANABAPTISTS*.
ZWINGER, JOHANN Zwinger, Johann

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zwinger, Johann a son of Theodor, and grandson of the younger Buxtorf, was born August 26, 1634, became professor of the Old Test. at Basle in 1675, and of the New Test. in 1685. He died of apoplexy, while engaged in lecturing to his students, in 1696.. He was a rigid predestinarian, a correspondent of Megarius, the pupil of Gomarus, and an opponent of Copernicus, concerning whose system he waged a literary war with the Basle mathematician, Peter Mezerlin.
ZWINGER, JOHANN RUDOLF Zwinger, Johann Rudolf

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zwinger, Johann Rudolf a son of Johann, was born September 12, 1660, and died November 18, 1708, and was antistes to the Basle Church and theological professor. He wrote dissertations and sermons, and also a book on the conversion of the Jews, entitled *Der Trost Israel's *(1706).
ZWINGER, THEODOR Zwinger, Theodor

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zwinger, Theodor a Swiss theologian, was born November 21, 1597, at Basle. He was a strict Calvinist, and defended the doctrine of predestination in a disputation it Heidelberg. In 1630 he was made antistes to the Church of Basle, to which position was attached a professorship of theology. The breaking of bread instead of the use of the host in the sacrament was introduced at Basle under his administration, respecting which event he published a report in his work on the Lord's Supper (1655). Of other works by his pen we mention a *Commentary on Romans *(1655). Both these works were published soon after his death, which occurred December 27, 1654. See Herzog, *Real-Encyklop*. s.v.
ZWINGLI (ZWINGLE, OR ZUINGLI; LAT ZWINGLIUS OR ZUINGLIUS), ULRICH Zwingli (Zwingle, or Zuingli; Lat Zwinglius or Zuinglius), Ulrich

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zwingli (Zwingle, Or Zuingli; Lat. Zwinglius Or Zuinglius), Ulrich the prime mover in the Reformation in Switzerland nearly as much as Luther in Germany, was born Jan. 1, 1484, in Wildhans, a village in the upper valley of the Toggenburg, in the Canton of St. Gall. Such was the precocity which he displayed in his youth that his father resolved to send him to Basel to be educated. He made such rapid progress in his studies that he soon accomplished the work upon the prosecution of which he had entered at Basel, and he was removed to Berne, and placed under the tuition of Lupulus, a distinguished scholar of his day, with whom he studied for some time. The Dominican monks in this place, attracted by his talents and rising reputation, sought to entrap him into their order; but his father, in order to remove him from the scene of temptation, sent him off to Vienna. Here he remained for a brief period and then returned to Basel, where he pursued his theological studies. Under the instruction of Thomas Wyttenback, he was led into a more liberal course of study than theological students had been wont to pursue. The charms of the classics were unfolded to him under the tuition of his learned master, and were cheerfully substituted for the dry husks of scholastic theology. In 1506 he became a pastor in Glarus, not far from, his native village. Here he devoted himself most diligently to the study of God's Word, copying with his own hand the original of Paul's Epistles, and transferring it to memory. During the same period he mingled in the strife of arms against the French. Influences which we will not stop to explain induced him to leave Glarus and become pastor in Einsiedeln, a famous spot in popish pilgrimage and superstition, where he preached doctrines which he had drawn from his study of the Holy Scriptures; and when, in 1519, he was called to the Cathedral Church of Zurich, he proclaimed the same truths which he had preached in the Church of the Virgin of the Hermitage in Einsieden. Multitudes flocked to hear him, attracted by the novelty of the doctrines he taught and the eloquence with which he spoke. He delivered expository discourses on Matthew and the Epistles of Paul and of Peter. The effect of his honest preaching of the Gospel soon became apparent in the city and country, and his general character and opinions produced a deep and universal sensation. While this state of transition was so marked, the orisis was hastened, in 1518, by the arrival of Samson, the seller of indulgences. The traffic in these "Roman wares" roused the indignation of Zwingli, and led to a keen exposure and a successful resistance. Luther's writings were, at the same time, largely circulated at the recommendation of the Reformer. The plague broke out, and, during its, continuance, though I weak 'himself' from exhaustion, Zwingli assiduously tended the sick and dying. His zealous labors grew in number and results, the simplicity of the Gospel was more distinctly apprehended by him; but the friends of the popedom were enraged, and Zwingli was tried, in January, 1523, on a charge of heresy. Rome gained nothing by the trial. Zwingli presented sixty-seven propositions, and defended them from Scripture. The Reformer gathered courage with growing difficulties, and in 1524 the Council of Zurich remodeled the public worship: according to the views and wishes of Zwingli. Pictures, statues, and relics were removed from the churches, and mass was abolished. Opposition to the Reformed doctrines was meanwhile gathering in the other cantons. The question arose, whether each canton was free to choose its own form of religion, or whether the Confederation should interfere; Zurich contended for its individual liberty and independence, but was opposed by the Waldstatter, or the primitive democratic cantons of Schwytz, Unterwald, Uri, and Lucerne. The triumph of the Reformation at Benle and other places threw those forest cantons into wilder commotion, and, in consonance with their views of their federal polity, they took up arms for Rome. Zurich encouraged by Zwingli, called out its troops and put itself into a posture of defense. Efforts were made to maintain peace, but it was of no long duration, and after various diplomatic negotiations, hostilities finally commenced. Zurich had also lost somewhat of its earlier evangelical purity, while the neighboring states were conspiring for its ruin. In the awful emergency, when the public mind was alarmed by a series of omens and prodigies, the Reformer maintained tranquility. The war began. Zurich was cowardly, dilatory, and far from being prepared; but the horn of the enemy echoed among their hills, and the devoted Zwingli monitored his caparisoned horse, took farewell of his wife and children, and went forth as a patriot and warrior to share in the common danger. His official position in the army, however, was that of chaplain, according to Swiss custom. The Zurichers marched to meet the Waldstatter, but were defeated at Cappel with great slaughter, Oct. 11, 1531. Zwingli was found, after the battle lying on his back and his eyes uptirned to heaven, with his helmet on his head, and his battle-axe in his hand. He had been struck near the commencement of the engagement, and then as he fell and reeled, he was several times pierced with a lance. According to some accounts, he was wounded while stooping to comfort a dying soldier. His last audible words were, "What of that? They can indeed kill the body, but they cannot kill the soul." He as living when discovered, in the evening; but the infuriated fanatics soon dispatched him. Next day his dead body was barbarously quartered and burned. Thus perished this hero a martyr. A plain monument in granite, erected in 1838, marks the spot where he died. But the Protestant faith gained the victory not in Zurich alone, nor was Zwingli the only Swiss reformer. AEcolampadius did a good work at Basel. In Berne, also, the Reformation was successful.. The Reformation being not only a religious movement, but in some respects a political one, it attracted to its support many persons who were, contending for the spread of more liberal opinions throughout Switzerland Zwingli was a patriot, and those who were immediately associated with him were patriots, and he believed that there could be no influence so potent to reach and transform the characters of his countrymen as the Gospel. There was substantial agreement between Luther and Zwingli on all the cardinal doctrines of the Protestant faith. On the doctrine of the eucharist there was, however, a radical difference of opinion. Luther held to "consubstantiation," declaring that there were present, in some mysterious way, the body and the blood of the Lord Jesus in the elements administered at the Lord's supper; while Zwingli contended that the sacrament was designed to be merely a reminder of the sufferings and death of the Savior. The controversy was a bitter one. Neither party could convince the brother. All that could be done was to lay down fourteen articles of faith, which were to be received by both parties on the basis of the Augsburg Confession. But these minor controversies, for such they seem to us to be, must have lost all their interest in the presence of the grave dangers, which threatened the very existence itself of the Reformation in Switzerland. Zwingli led the Reform movement in the other German cantons of Switzerland, and attended the conference at Berne in 1528, which resulted in the abolition of the mass. He was invited to a personal conference with Luther and Melancthon at Marburg, September, 1529, to adjust the only serious doctrinal difference between them on them eucharistic Presence. He counseled energetic measures for the promotion of the Reform in his native land, but was defeated by the policy of hesitation, which prevailed in. Berne. He also entered into bold political combinations with Philip of Hesse for the triumph of the Protestant cause in Germany, and addressed the emperor of Germany and the king of France with a confession of his faith. Zwingli was a bold Reformer, an able scholar, in eloquent preacher, a patriotic republican, and farsighted statesman. He lacked the genius and depth of Luther and Calvin, the learning of Melancthon and AEcolampadius; but he was their equal in honesty of purpose integrity of characters heroic courage, and devotion to the cause of Reformation, and surpassed them in liberality is prominent intellectual trait was clear, strong common-sense. Zwingli's principal works are a *Commentary on the True and False Religion *(1525):— sermon on *Providence *(preached at Marburg, 1529): — his *Confession of Faith, *addressed to Charles V of Germany (1530): — a similar *Exposition of Faith, *addressed to Francis I of France (July, 1531, three months before his death). This last document is clear, bold, spirited, and full of hope for the triumph of the truth; warns the king against the slanderous misrepresentations of Protestant doctrines, and entreats him to give free course to the, Gospel, and to forgive the boldness with which he dared to approach his majesty. A few years afterwards (1536) Calvin dedicated, in a most eloquent preface, his famous, *Christian Institutes *to the same monarch, but with equal want of direct: success. Zwingli represents only the first stage the history of the Reformed Church. His work was completed after his death by 'his' successor, Bullinger, at Zurich, and still more by Calvin at Geneva. See I. *Zwingli Opera, *edit. Schuler and Schulthess. (Zurich, 1828-42, 8 vols); a popular edition of; his *Works *by Christoffel, (ibid. 1843 sq. 15 vols.); *Biographies of Zwingli, *by Myconius (1536), Nuscheler (1776); Hess -(1811; transl. by Aikini; Lond. 1812), Schuler (1819), Hottinger (1843; transl. by Themas. C. Porter, Harrisburg, 1856) Robins. (*in Bibliotheca. Sacra *for 1851), Roder (1855), Christoffel (1857; transl. by. John Cochran, Edinburgh, 1858) Gilder (in Herzog *Real- Encyklop. *1864), and especially Morikoferi (*Ulrich Zwinglinach den Quellen. *[Leipsic, 1867-69 2 vols.]), On the theological system of Zwingli see Zeletr, *as theol. System Zwingli's *(1583); Siegwart, *Ulrich Zwingli der. Charakterseiner Theologie *(1855); — Sparri, *Zwingli-Studien *(1866). Compare also *D'Aubigne, History of the Reformation, *vol. 4; Hagenbach, Geschichte, *der Reformation *(1870), p. 183 sq.; and *Fisher, The Reformation *(1873), p. 137 sq. **THE END.**
ZWINGLIANISM Zwinglianism

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zwinglianism *SEE ZWINGLI; SEE ZWINGLIANS*.
ZWINGLIANS Zwinglians

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zwinglians a name given to the early Swiss Protestants from their leader Zwingli (q.v.). It is also used as a controversial designation of those who hold Zwingli's view respecting the mere memorial character of the eucharist. The theology of Zwingli is of interest as having influenced the English Puritans to a considerable extent, until Zwingli was overshadowed by Calvin during the reign of queen Elizabeth. Zwingli's innovations respecting the ministerial office began, like those of Luther, with the principle that every one, in virtue of the priesthood common to all Christians, is at liberty to preach, preaching being the chief function of the ministry. The irregularities of the Anabaptists, however, compelled him to have recourse to some form of mission from the Church. He lays down the necessity of a call to the ministry, notices three modes of election named in the Scripture, and states that it is proper for the election to rest with the body of the faithful, advised by learned men *(Eccles. *2:52-54). But he rejected all notion of priesthood or holy orders. The Basle Confession places the election in the ministers and church deputies, and mentions imposition of hands. The Helvetic Confession decrees that ministers be called by an ecclesiastical and lawful election, either by the Church or its deputies. It adheres strictly to the Zwinglian principle that all ministers have one and the same power and function; but it departs from this principle in assigning them some power of governing, and in vesting in them some power of excommunication. Zwingli considered the exercise of the power of the keys to be nothing more than the general preaching of the gospel. His magisterial excommunication was only an external, not a spiritual sentence. The Helvetic Confession gives the same account of the power of the keys, and the excommunication which it restores to the ministers still belongs, therefore, only to the *forum externum, *not to the *forum conscientiae.* Zwingli's doctrine of the sacraments is peculiar. He holds that they are mere signs of initiation or of pledging of continuance. They confer no grace; they do not free the conscience; they are not even pledges of grace. Every spiritual efficacy which has been attributed to them is denied. Baptism does not make sons of God, but those who are sons already receive a token of their sonship. It does not take away sin. The baptism of Christ and his apostles was the same as the baptism of John. The eucharist is regarded in the same way. The liturgical forms of Zwingli and his followers were constructed on the basis of the doctrines held. The form of baptism in Zwingli's *Works *(2:98) has a prayer for the infant that God would give him the light of faith, that he may be incorporated into Christ, buried with him, etc. This refers all to a faith to be given to the child as he grows up to a capacity of faith. The form carefully avoids, either in prayer or declaration, any mention of remission of sins or of regeneration. The *Liturgia Tigurina *has the same prayer, and reads the same gospel from St. Mark. It adds the Creed, recited to the sureties as the belief in which the child is to be brought up, and the minister addresses the sureties: "We will bring unto the Saviour this child as far as it lieth in our power; that is, through baptism we will receive him in his Church, and give him the earnest of the covenant and of the people of God." The form of administration of the eucharist in the liturgy is the same as that in Zwingli's *Works *(2:563), and is adapted to the doctrine of sacraments already stated. Theoretically, Zwingli did not view the community in its two capacities, civil and ecclesiastical, and recognise as belonging to it two independent jurisdictions, temporal and spiritual; the community to him was a Church, and nothing else. His magistrates were Church officers, deriving their authority equally with the ministry from the body of the faithful, and distinguished from them only by the character of the work which a division of labor assigned to each. Practically, however, the result was that the sovereignty in spiritual as well as in temporal matters was vested in the civic authorities of each community. The system of Zwingli was in some measure modified by Bullinger, who introduced something approaching to a recognition of a clergy and of efficacy in sacraments; and, again, the influence of the Geneva ministers added to the Zurich doctrine of. the Lord's Supper something of that Calvinistic teaching regarding receiving the body and blood of Christ, which corresponds to the present accepted belief. It was Swiss theology, so modified by Bullinger, that found advocates in England. Hooper was a faithful follower of Bullinger. Peter Martyr, a Lasco, Dryander, and Ochino were on the same side, and with them acted most of the party of the Marian exiles, *SEE ZURICH LETTERS*, who had been received with great hospitality at Zurich. Hoadley's doctrine of then Lord's Supper is not distinguishable from Zwingli's. See Zwingli's *Works, *by Gualter (154445), especially the treatises *Expositio Fidei Christiana, De Vera et Falso Religione, Ecclesiastes, Archeteles; *also *Basle Confession *(1536), *Helvetic Confession *(1566), *In Sylloge Confessio *(Oxford, 1827), and *Liturgia Tigurina *(Engl, transl. Lond. 1693). *SEE EUCHARIST; SEE REAL PRESENCE; SEE SACRAMENT; SEE TRANSUBSTANTIATION*.
ZYRO, FERDINAND FRIEDRICH Zyro, Ferdinand Friedrich

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Zyro, Ferdinand Friedrich a Protestant theologian, and formerly professor of theology at Berne, who died May 10, 1874, at Rheinfeldern, is the author of, *Ein freies Wort uber die gegenwartigen Verhaltnisse der evangelisch-reformirten Kirche und ihrer Diener im Kanton Bern *(Berne, 1831): — *Des praktischen Theologen Gesinnung in dieser Zeit *(ibid. 1834): — *Die evangelisch reformirte Kirche u. ihre Fortbildung im XIX. Jahrhundert *(ibid. 1837): — *De Optima Theologos, qui Dicuntur, Practicos Formandi via ac Ratione *(ibid. 1845): — *Des Apostels Paulus Sendschreiben an die Galater, Epheser, Philipper, Kolosser u. Thessalonicher. Neu iibeisetzt* (Aarau, 1860): — *Handbuch zum Heidelberger Katechismus *(Berne, 1848). See Zuchold, *Bibl. Theol. *2:1509. (B.P.)
WESTMINSTER FORM OF PRESBYTERIAL CHURCH GOVERNMENT AND OF ORDINATION OF MINIS... Westminster Form of Presbyterial Church Government and of Ordination of Ministers

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Westminster Form of Presbyterial Church Government and of Ordination of Ministers The members of the synod were at first inclined, as a general thing, to content themselves with restoring apostolical or primitive simplicity in the Episcopal Church; but, after the arrival of the Scottish commissioners and the adoption of the *Solemn League and Covenant, *the synod became predominantly Presbyterian in its views. The Presbyterial constitution was recognized as originating with Christ and being the only scriptural form of Church organization. Toleration was opposed; and uniformity was strenuously insisted on. Liberty of conscience was stigmatized as the outgrowth of blameworthy indifference and betrayal of the truth. In these tenets the majority was zealously opposed, however, by the Independents led by Dr. Thomas Goodwin, who insisted upon the divine right of each congregation to govern itself under the Word of God; and by the Erastians, who wished to relegate the power to punish ecclesiastical as well as civil offences altogether to the secular authorities, and, in general, advocated the subordination of the Church to the State as the only trustworthy means for doing away with spiritual tyranny and also of obviating all conflict between Church and State. The leaders of the Erastian party were the celebrated Orientalists and antiquarians Lightfoot and Selden, etc. When the Presbyterian party prevailed, the Independents and Erastians withdrew from the synod; but Parliament adopted the Scotch-Presbyterian constitution with an Erastian proviso, and with the declaration that it should be set aside if, after trial, its provisions should be found impracticable. The event proved that England was not ripe for such a Church organization. Independency and other forms of dissent conquered the Westminster Assembly and made an end of all its endeavors towards conformity.
WESTMINSTER, COUNCILS OF Westminster, Councils of

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Westminster, Councils Of *(Concilium Westmonasteriense). *Westminster is a city of England, county of Middlesex, forming the west part of London, having on the south and west Chelsea and Kensington, on the north Marylebone, and on the east the Thames. In 1871 the population was 246,606. It contains numerous magnificent public buildings, and is the seat of many important historic events. Several ecclesiastic councils have been held there. **I. **Was held about 1070, by archbishop Lanfranc, in the presence of William I, in which Wulstan, bishop of Worcester, who alone of the Saxon bishops had withstood William, was deprived, upon the plea of want of learning. When he found that he was to be stripped of his episcopal vestments, he boldly exclaimed to William, "These I owe to a better man than thee; to him will I restore them." Whereupon he went to the tomb of Edward the Confessor, who had advanced him to his see, and there taking off his vestments he laid them down, and struck his pastoral staff so deep into the stone that, as the legend states, no human force could draw it but. This miracle or his deserved reputation for sanctity, produced a revision of the sentence of deprivation, and he retained his bishopric. See Johnson, *Preface to Lanfranc's Canons at Winchester; *Wilkins, *Concil. *1:367; Wharton, *Anglia Sacra, *2:225. **II. **Was held in 1102, "in St. Peter's Church, on the west side of London," i.e., at Westminster-Anselm, archbishop of Canterbury, and Gerard of York, being present, with eleven other bishops, and some abbots. In this synod, three great abbots were deposed for simony, three not yet consecrated were turned out of their abbeys, and three others deprived for other crimes. Roger the king's chancellor was consecrated to the see of Salisbury, and Roger the king's larderer to Hereford. Twenty-nine canons were published. **1. **Forbids bishops to keep secular courts of pleas, and to apparel themselves like laymen. **2. **Forbids to let archdeaconries to farm. **3. **Enacts that archdeacons must be deacons. **4. **Enacts that no archdeacon, priest, deacon, or canon shall marry, or retain his wife if married. Enacts the same with regard to subdeacons who have married after profession of chastity. **5. **Declares that a priest guilty of fornication is not a lawful priest, and forbids him to celebrate mass. **6. **Orders that no one be ordained subdeacon, or to any higher order, except he profess chastity. **7. **Orders that the sons of priests be not heirs to their fathers' churches. **8. **Orders that no clergyman be a judge in a case of blood. **9. **Orders that priests go not to drinking-bouts, nor drink "to pegs." **10. **Orders that their clothes be all of one color, and their shoes plain. **11. **Orders monks or clerks who have forsaken their order to return, or be excommunicated. **12. **Orders that the tonsure of clerks be visible. **13. **Orders that tithe be paid to the Church only. **14. **Forbids to buy churches or prebends. **15. **Forbids to build new chapels without the bishop's consent. **16. **Forbids to consecrate new churches until all things necessary for it, and the priest, have been provided. **17. **Forbids abbots to create knights; orders them to eat and sleep in the same house with their monks. **18. **Forbids monks to enjoin penance except in certain cases. **19. **Forbids monks to be godfathers, or nuns godmothers. **20. **Forbids monks to hire farms. **21. **Forbids monks to accept of the impropriations of churches without the bishop's consent, and further forbids them to spoil and reduce to poverty those who minister in their parishes. **22. **Declares promises of marriage made without witnesses to be null, if either party deny them. **23. **Orders that those who have hair be clipped, so that their ears and eyes shall be visible. **24. **Forbids those who are related within the seventh' degree to marry. **25. **Forbids to defraud the priest of his dues by carrying a corpse for burial to another parish. **26. **Forbids to attribute reverence or sanctity to a dead body, or fountain, etc., without the bishop's authority. **27. **Forbids to sell men like beasts, as had hitherto been done in England. **28. **Anathematizes persons guilty of certain horrible sins of uncleanness. **29. **Orders the publication of the above excommunication in all churches every Sunday. See Johnson, *Eccles. Canons, *A.D. 1102; Wilkins, *Conc.* 1:382. **III. **Was held January 13, 1126. Otto, the pope's nuncio, was present, and read a bull of Honorius containing the same proposition which the legate had made to the French clergy assembled at Bourges in November, 1225, viz., that in every cathedral church the pope should nominate to two prebends and in every monastery to two places. The bishops separated without coming to any decision. See Mansi, *Concil. *11:303. **IV. **Was held September 9, 1126, by William Corbeil, archbishop of Canterbury-John de Cremona, legate from Honorius II, presiding. Thurstan, archbishop of York, and about twenty bishops, forty abbots, and an innumerable assembly of clergy and people, were present. Seventeen canons were published. **1. **Forbids simony. **2. **Forbids to charge anything for chrism, oil, baptism, visiting and anointing the sick, communion, and burial. **3. **Forbids to demand cope, carpet, towel, or basin at the consecration of bishops, or churches, or blessing of abbots. **4. **Forbids investiture at the hands of lay persons. **5. **Forbids any one to challenge a church or benefice by inheritance, and to appoint a successor. Ps 83:11,13 is quoted. **6. **Deprives beneficed clerks who refused to he ordained (priests or deacons) in order that they might live more at liberty. **7. **Orders that none but priests be made deans or priors, nor any but deacons archdeacons. **8. **Forbids to ordain any one a priest without a title. **9. **Forbids, under pain of excommunication, to. eject anyone from a church to which he has been instituted without the bishop's sentence. **10. **Forbids bishops to ordain or pass sentence upon any. one belonging to the jurisdiction of another bishop. **11. **Forbids, under pain of excommunication, to receive an excommunicated person to communion. **12. **Forbids any one to hold two dignities in the Church. **13. **Forbids priests, deacons, subdeacons, and canons to dwell in the same house with any woman, except a mother, sister, aunt, or unsuspected woman. Offenders to lose their order. **14. **Forbids the practice of usury among clerks. **15. **Excommunicates sorcerers, etc. **16. **Forbids marriage within the seventh degree; **17. **Declares that no regard is to be paid to husbands; who implead their wives as too near akin to them. See Wilkins, *Conc. *1:406; Johnson, *Eccles. Canons, *A.D;, 1126. **V. **Was held in 1127, by William Corbeil, arclibishop of Canterbury, the pope's legate; ten English bishops, attended, and three Welsh. It is also, said that the multitude of clergy and laity of all ranks who flocked to the council was immense, but no mention is made of abbots. The archbishop of York sent excuses, and the bishops of Durham and Worcester were also absent; the sees of London and Coventry were at that time vacant. This synod sat three several days. and ten canons were published. **1. **Forbids, "by authority of Peter, prince of the apostles," and that of the archbishop and bishops assembled, the buying and selling of churches and benefices. **2. **Forbids any one to be ordained or preferred by means of money. **3. **Forbids all demands of money for admitting monks, canons, or nuns. **4. **Orders that priests only shall be made deans, and deacon's archdeacons. **5. **Forbids priests, deacons, subdeacons, and canons to live with women not allowed by law. Those that adhered to their concubines or wives to be deprived of their order, dignity, and benefice; if *parish priests, *to be cast out of the choir and declared infamous. **6. **Requires archdeacons and others whom it concerned to use all their endeavors to root out this plague from the Church. **7. **Orders the expulsion from the parish of the concubines of priests and canons, unless they are lawfully married there. If they be afterwards found faulty, directs that they shall be brought under ecclesiastical discipline, or servitude, at the discretion of the bishop. **8. **Forbids, under anathema, any one to hold several archdeaconries in several bishoprics, and directs him to keep to that he first took; forbids priests, abbots, and monks to take anything to farm. **9. **Orders the payment of tithe in full. Forbids churches or tithes or benefices to be given or taken without the consent of the bishop. **10. **That no abbess or nun use more costly apparel than such as is made of lambs' or cats' skins. Matthew of Paris declares that the king (Henry I) eluded all these provisions (to which he had given his consent) by obtaining from the archbishop a promise that he should be intrusted with their execution; whereas, in reality, he executed them only by taking money from the priests as a ransom for their concubines. See *Johnson, Eccles. Canons, *A.D. 1127; Wilkins, *Conc. *1:410. **VI. **Was held in 1138 by Alberic, bishop of Ostia, legate of pope Innocent II, during the vacancy of the see of Canterbury; eighteen bishops and about thirty abbots attended, who proceeded to the election of Theobald to the see of Canterbury. Seventeen canons were published. **1. **Forbids to demand any price for chrism, oil, baptism, penance, visitation of the sick, espousalis, unction, communion, or burial, under pain of excommunication. **2. **Orders that the body of Christ be not reserved above eight days, and that it be ordinarily carried to the sick by a priest or deacon only; in case of extreme necessity by any one, but with the greatest reverence. **3. **Forbids to demand a cope, ecclesiastical vestment, or anything else, upon the consecration of bishops and benediction of abbots; also foirbids to require a carpet, towel, basin, or anything beyond the canonical procuration, upon the dedication of a church. **4. **Forbids to demand any extra fees when a bishop not belonging to the diocese consecrates a church. **5. **Forbids lay investitures; orders every one, upon investiture by the bishop, to swear on the gosplels that he has not, directly or indirectly, given or promised anything for it, else the donation to be null. **6. **Is identical with canon 5, A.D. 1126. **7. **Forbids persons ordained by other than their own bishop without letters from him to exercise their office; reserves the restoration of them to their order to the pope, unless they take a religious habit. **8. **Deprives concubinary clerks, and forbids any to hear their mass. **9. **Deprives usurious clergymen. **10. **Anathematizes him that kills, imprisons, or lays hands on a clerk, monk, nun, or other ecclesiastical person. Forbids any but the pope to grant him penance at the last, except in extreme danger of death; denies him burial if he die impenitent. **11. **Excommunicates all persons violently taking away the goods of the Church. **12. **Forbids any one to build a church or oratory upon his estate without the bishop's license. **13. **Forbids the clergy to carry arms and fight in the wars. **14. **Forbids monks after receiving orders to recede from their former way of living. **15. **Forbids nuns, under anathema, to use parti-colored skins or golden rings, and to wreathe their hair. **16. **Commands, under anathema, all persons to pay the tithe of all their fruits. **17. **Forbids schoolmasters to hire out their schools to be governed by others. See Johnson, *Ecckles. Canons, *A.D. 1138; Wilkins, *Conc. *1:413. **VII. **Was held in 1176 by cardinal Hugo or Hugezen, who had been sent from Rome to endeavor to settle the dispute between the archbishops of Canterbury and York; the latter of whom claimed the right of having his cross borne before him in the province of Canterbury. Many prelates and clergy attended; but when Roger of York, upon entering the assembly, perceived that the seat on the right hand of the legate had been assigned to the archbishop of Canterbury, and that on the left kept for himself, he thrust himself into the lap of the archbishop of Canterbury; whereupon the servants of the latter and many of the bishops (as Hovenden writes) threw themselves upon the archbishop of York, and forced him down upon the ground, trampled upon him, and rent his cope; upon which the council broke up in confusion. Johnson, *ut sup.; *Wilkins, *Conc. *1:485. **VIII. **Was a national council held in 1200 by Hubert Walter, archbishop of Canterbury, in which fifteen canons were published. **1. **Orders the priest to say the canon of the mass distinctly, and to rehearse the hours and all the offices plainly, and without clipping the words. Offenders to be suspended. **2. **Forbids to celebrate two masses in one day except in case of necessity. When it is done, it directs that nothing be poured into the chalice after the first celebration, but that the least drop be diligently supped out of the chalice, and the fingers sucked and washed; the washings to be drunk by the priest after the second celebration, except if deacon be present to do so at the time. Orders that the eucharist be kept in a decent pyx, and carried to the sick with cross and candle; care to be taken not to confuse the consecrated and unconsecrated hosts. **3. **Orders that baptism and confirmation shall be conferred upon those concerning whom there exists a doubt whether or not they have received them. Forbids fathers, mothers-in-law, and parents to hold the child at the font. Forbids deacons to baptize and give penance, except in case of the priest's absence, or other necessity. Permits even a father or mother to baptize their child in case of necessity, and orders that all that follows after the immersion shall be completed subsequently by the priest. **4. **Relates to the administration of penance. **5. **Renews the decrees of the Council of Lateran, A.D. 1179, which restrict the expenses and retinue of prelates and other ordinaries when in visitation, and declares the design of visitations to be to see to what concerns the cure of souls, and that every church have a silver chaulice, decent vestments, and necessary books, utensils, etc. **6. **Orders that bishops ordaining any one without a title shall maintain him till he can make a clerical provision for him. **7. **Renews the canon of Lateran, A.D. 1179, which forbids prelates to excommunicate their subjects without canonical warning. Orders the yearly pronunciation of a general excommunication against persons guilty of various specific crimes. **8. **Renews canon 7, Lateran, A.D. 1179. **9. **Orders the payment of tithe without abatement for wages, etc.; grants to priests the power of excommunicating, before harvest, all withholders of tithe. Orders the tithe of land newly cultivated to be paid to the parish church. Orders detainers of tithe to be anathematized. **10. **Forbids to institute any persons to churches not worth more than three marks per annum who will not serve in person. Renews the 11th canon of Lateran, A.D. **11. **Forbids clerks to go to taverns and drinking-booths, and so put themselves in the way of being insulted by laymen. Orders all the clergy to use the canonical tonsure and clerical habit, and archdeacons and dignified clergymen copes with sleeves. **11. **Forbids marriage under various circumstances; orders that the banns be thrice published; that marriage be celebrated openly in the face of the Church. **12. **Orders those who, being suspected of crimes, deny them, to undergo a purgation. **13. **Renews the 23d canon of Lateran, 1179, concerning churches and priests for lepers. **14. **Renews canon 9 of Lateran, which forbids the Templars and other fraternities to accept of tithes, churches, etc., without the bishop's consent. **15. **Renews canon 10 of Lateran, 1179, and contains various regulations relating to the dress, etc., of the religious. See Wilkins, *Conc. *1:505; Johnson, *Eccles. Canons, *ad ann. **IX. **Was held about 1229 by Richard Wethershed, archbishop of Canterburmy. Twelve constitutions were published, eleven of which are the same with those published in the Council of London, A.D. 1175. The last refers to the duties of physicians. See Johnson, *Eccles. Canons.* X. Was held in 1229 under master Stephen, chaplain and nuncio of the pope, who, sorely to the discomfort of the assembly, demanded on the part of Rome the tenths of all movables belonging to clergy and laity in England, Ireland, and Wales, in order to enable the Roman pontiff to carry on war against the excommunicated emperor Frederick. The arguments by which, assuming Rome as the head of all churches, it was asserted that her fall would involve the ruin of the members, was met on the part of the laity by a plain refusal; and the clergy, after three or four days' deliberation and no small murmuring, were at length brought to consent from fear of excommunication or an interdict being the consequence of disobedience to the demand. See Wilkins, *Conc. *1:622.
WESTON, DAVID, DD Weston, David, Dd

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Weston, David, D.D. a Baptist minister, was born in North Middleborough, Mass., Jan. 26, 1836, and was a graduate of Brown University in the class of 1859, and of the Newton Theological Institution in the class of 1862. Soon after graduating he was ordained pastor of the Pleasant Street Baptist Church, Worcester, Mass., where he remained nearly eight years. He resigned on account of his health, and for two years was the principal of the Worcester Academy. For a short time he was pastor of the Central Baptist Church in Salem. Mass., from which place he removed to, Hamilton, N.Y., having accepted an appointment as professor in Madison University. His instruction was in ecclesiastical history in the theological department, and civil history in the collegiate department. After a service of two years and a half, he died, Feb. 21, 1875. Dr. Weston published a revised and valuable edition of Backus's *History of the Baptists in New England *(J. C. S.)
WESTON, EDWARD, DD Weston, Edward, Dd

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Weston, Edward, D.D. an eminent Roman Catholic divine, was born in London about the middle of the 16th century. He spent about five years at Oxford, studying in Lincoln College and in the private school of Dr. John Chase; studied subsequently six years at Rome and some time at Rheims; taught divinity at the latter place and at Douay from 1592 until about 1602; afterwards went on a mission to England, where he remained some time; returned to Douay in 1612; became canon: of the collegiate Church of St. Mary at Bruges, in Flanders, in which capacity he continued until his death, in 1634. He was the author of several works, among which are, *Institutiones de Triplici Hominis Officio, ex Notione ipsius Naturalii A Morali, ac Theologica *(1602): *— Triall of Christian Truth by the Rules of the Verttues *(Douay, 161.4): — and *Theatrum Vitae Civilis ac Sacrae, *etc. (1626).
WESTON, HUGO Weston, Hugo

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Weston, Hugo an English divine of the 16th century, was a native of Lincolnshire. He was educated at Baliol College, Oxford; became proctor of Oxford in 1537, was rector of Lincoln College in 1537-38, elected Margaret professor of divinity in 1540, became rector of St..Botolph's in 1543, archdeacon of Cornwall in 1547, dean of Westminster in 1553, archdeacon of Colchester in the same year, dean of Windsor in 1556, was deprived of his preferments by cardinal Pole for alleged immorality in 1557, and died in 1558. He was the author of, *Oratio coran Patribus et Clero, Anno Primo Marice *(1553): *— Disputations with Cranmer, Ridley, and Latimer in the Divinity School, Oxford *(1554). See Allibone, *Dict. of Brit and Amer. Authors, s.v.*
WESTON, JOHN EQUALITY Weston, John Equality

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Weston, John Equality a Baptist minister, was born in Amherst, N. H., Oct. 13, 1796. He was licensed to preach in 1822, and in 1827 was ordained pastor of the Baptist Church in East Cambridge, a relation which continued, until his death, July 2, 1831. In 1819, in connection with Mr. True, he started the first Baptist newspaper in America, the *Christian Watchman. *See Sprague, *Annals of the Amer. Pulpit, *6:713.
WESTON, JOHN W Weston, John W

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Weston, John W. a Methodist Episcopal minister, was born near Easton, Md., Jan. 1, 1839. He was converted in 1856; soon began preaching, and in 1862 was received into the Philadelphia Conference, and in it worked with great zeal and fidelity. He died in Wilmington, Del., April 23, 1877. Mr. Weston was a good preacher, a skilful workman, and an upright man. See *Minutes of Annual Conferences, *1878, p. 22.
WESTON, STEPHEN (1) Weston, Stephen (1)

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Weston, Stephen (1) an English prelate, was born at Farnborough, Berkshire, in 1665. He was educated at Eton and at King's College, Cambridge, where he graduated in 1686; became a fellow of both colleges; was for some time assistant and then under-master of Eton School; became vicar of Maple-Durham, Oxfordshire; was collated to a stall in Elv in 1715; became archdeacon of Cornwall; was consecrated bishop of Exeter Dec. 28, 1724; and died Jan. 16, 1741 or 1742. In 1749 two volumes of his *Sermons *appeared, published by bishop Sherlock.
WESTON, STEPHEN (2) Weston, Stephen (2)

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Weston, Stephen (2) an English clergyman and Oriental scholar, was born at Exeter in 1747. He was educated at Eton and at Exeter College, Oxford; became fellow of his college, took orders in the Church of England, held the living of Mamhead (1777-90), that of Hempston, Devonshire (1786-90), and afterwards devoted himself to Continental travel and literature, becoming distinguished as a classical and Oriental scholar. He died in London, Jan. 8, 1830. His published works include translations from the Chinese and Persian, *Specimen of the Conformity of the European with the Oriental Languages (1802): — Fragments of Oriental Literature (1807): — Sunday Lessons throughout the Year *(1808-9): *— Specimen of a Chinese Dictionary *(1812):*Annotations on Certain Passages in the Psalms, with Hebrew and Greek Titles *(1824): — besides several works on travel. See (Lond.) *Gentleman's Magazine, *1830, 1, 370.
WESTON, WILLIAM Weston, William

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Weston, William an English clergyman, was born about 1700. He graduated at St. John's College, Cambridge, of which he became a fellow, and was many years rector of Campden, Gloucestershire, where he died in 1760. He was the author of, *Inquiry into the Rejection of the Christian Miracles by the Heathen (1746): — Dissertations on Some of the Most Remarkable Wonders of Antiquity (1748): — Safety and Perpetuity of the British State *(1759): *— New Dialogues of the Dead *(1762): — and other works.
WESTPHAL, GEORG CHRISTIAN ERHARD Westphal, Georg Christian Erhard

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Westphal, Georg Christian Erhard a Protestant theologian of Germany, was born in 1757 at Quedlinburg. He studied at Jena and Halle. After completing his studies he acted for some time as private tutor. In 1775 he was appointed teacher at the Quedlinburg gymnasium, and in 1779 was called as second pastor to Halberstadt. In 1785 he went to Halle, was made member of consistory in 1805, and died Dec. 2, 1808. Besides a number of *Sermons *which he published, he translated the histories of Livy and Valerius Maximus into German. See Döring, *Die deutscien Kanzelredner, *p. 566 sq. (B. P.)
WESTPHAL, JOACHIM Westphal, Joachim

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Westphal, Joachim a zealous and uncompromising Lutheran polemic and Flacianist, was born at Hamburg in 1510 or 1511. He was educated at Wittenberg under Luther and Melancthon, and elsewhere, and after various vicissitudes settled, in 1541, as pastor in his native city. When the disputes consequent on the Leipsic Interim broke out, he united with Flacius and his party, and published his first work, against Melancthon and Wittenberg, under the title *Hist. Vituli Aurei Aaronis Exodus 32 ad Nostra Tempora et Controv. Accommodata *(Magdeb. 1549). A second work incident to the Adiaphoristic controversy, and discussing the advisability of allowing the adiaphora as a lesser evil than rejecting them, issued from his pen in the following year, entitled *Explicatio Generalis Sententice quod e duobus Malis Minus Eligendum sit, ex qua, Qui'vis Eruditus Intelligere Potest quod in Controv. de Adiaph. Sequendum aut Fugiendum sit. *In the Osiandrian disputes he was associated with Johann Aepin in the judgment returned by Hamburg, etc., theologians to duke Albert of Prussia on Osiander's doctrine of justification (Magdeb. 1553). It is also probable that in the Majoristic controversy he composed the harsh opinion of the Hamburg theologians respecting Major's doctrine of the necessity of good works to salvation. His principal field of battle, however, was the sacramental dispute, in which he defended extreme Lutheran orthodoxy against Swiss and Philippist latitudinarianism. Peter Martyr had denied the bodily-presence of Christ in the elements of the Lord's supper, at Oxford, 1549, and Calvin and Farel avowed similar views in the *Consensus Tigurensis *of that year, issued by them in conjunction with the clergy of Zurich. An extract from Martyr's lectures was soon afterwards published (Tiguri, 1552) by J. Wolphius, in which the editor claimed that Luther's doctrine of the Lord's supper, had been thoroughly destroyed. Westphal at once issued in reply, and also as an attack upon the Philippists, who agreed more nearly with the Swiss than the Lutheran view, a *Fariago Opinionum de Caena Domini, *etc. (Magdeb. 1552). In 1553 he repeated the effort by publishing *Recta Fides de Cana Domini ex Verbis Apostoli Pauli et Evangel. *(ibid.). At this juncture Mary of England had expelled the congregation of French and Netherlandish exiles formed by John I Lasco in London, and they were seeking a refuge in North. Germany, which was everywhere denied them. Westphal held a disputation with Micronius, one of their preachers, and was exceedingly zealous in opposing them. In. 1554 he published a third book against the Reformed doctrines of the sacrament under the title *Collectanea Sentent. D. Aurel. Augustin. de Caena Domini, etc., *in which he tried to show that the Swiss view has no support in the utterances of Augustine. This work, reinforced by indignation growing out of the author's treatments of a Lasco and his Reformed adherents, drew out a reply from Calvin, under date of Nov. 28,1554 (*Defensio Sanae et Orthodoxae Doctr. de Sacrament. *etc.), which was written in a style of proud and haughty depreciation of the adversary it was designed to demolish. A rapid interchange of writings followed, in the course of which Lasco, Bullinger, and Beza became involved in the dispute. As a final effort, to defeat his opponents, Westphal wrote to various churches in, Lower Saxony to unite them in. a league against the Switzers, and received from many of them statements of their belief, which he published under the title *Confessio Fidei de Eucharistiae Sacramento, *etc. (Magdeb. 1557). The leaders of the strict Lutheran party, e.g. Brentius, Andrea, Schnepf, Paul von Eitzen, etc., also came to his support. After 1560 Westphal withdrew from the arena of religious controversy. He acted as superintendent of Hamburg from 1562 to 1571, and in the latter year was appointed to that office. He died Jan. 16, 1574; See the *Corpus Reformaoraum *(ibid. 1840-42), ed. Bretschneiderj vol. 7:8:9; Gieseler, *Kirchengesch. *(Bonn, 1853), 3, 2,1; Möller, *Flensburg. Cinbria Literata* (Hanau, 1744), p. 641-649; Herzog, *Real-Encyklop. *s.v.
WESTPHALIA, PEACE OF Westphalia, Peace of

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Westphalia, Peace of (also known as the *Peace of Münster). *This title designates the treaty which brought the Thirty Years' War (q.v.) to a conclusion in 1648, and which was drawn up in the Westphalian cities of Münster and Osnaburg. The Peace of Prague, May 20 (30), 1635, concluded between the emperor Ferdinand II and the elector John George of Saxony, was designed to extend amnesty to Protestants over the whole empire, excepting Bohemia, the Palatinate, and various individual princes and nobles (see the imperial patent of June 12,1635); but these exceptions, and the successes of the Swedish armies, together with the direct intervention of France in the war, prevented the consummation of the proposed peace, and constrained the emperor to convoke a general diet to meet at Ratisbon in 1840. A more important congress of deputies from the different contending powers was assembled, however, at about the same time in Hamburg, whose deliberations resulted in the signing of preliminaries of peace, Dec. 15 (25), 1641. The settling of these preliminaries was rendered difficult by the conflicting views of the French and Swedes, and the suspicions they entertained respecting each other; and the preliminaries themselves merely designated the places and dates for the holding of a definite peace convention, and determined rules to be observed with respect to the safe- conduct and powers of deputies. The sanction of the representatives of the empire and of the emperor himself to these arrangements was not obtained until 1644, and the proposed congress was delayed until April, 1645. The representatives of the emperor, the states of the empire, and the Swedes met at Osnaburg, and those of the emperor, the, French, and other foreign powers at Münster. Each convention was to become a party to whatever decisions might be reached in either place, and neither convention was authorized to conclude a separate peace. The negotiations, which were protracted during more than three years, were greatly influenced, of course, by the varying fortunes of the war, which was incessantly prosecuted; but the Osnaburg convention succeeded in settling terms of peace, Aug. 8, and the Münster convention reached a like conclusion, Sept. 17, 1648. The treaty was then adopted and signed in a general assembly of both conventions, Oct. 14 (24), 1648. Spain and the United Netherlands had previously (Jan. 20 [30], 1648) reached an agreement at Münster by which the independence of the latter country was recognized and its league with Germany dissolved. The independence of the Swiss Confederation, already pronounced by the Peace of Basle, Sept. 22,1499, was confirmed by the Treaty of Westphalia. The provisions of this peace belong to our field only in so far as they involve religious or ecclesiastical interests. In these respects they: **1. **Ordain that the demands of France, Sweden, and Hesse-Cassel be satisfied. This confirmed the supremacy of France over the cities of Metz, Toul, and Verdun, and established it over Alsace and the principality of Hagenan. Sweden obtained jurisdiction over Pomerania and the archbishopric of Bremen. These arrangements involved a transfer of ecclesiastical power also, though with certain exceptions which were particularly specified. **2. **Compensate Brandenburg, Mecklenburg, and Brunswitk-Lueburg for territory lost by the arrangement made to satisfy France, etc., and thereby bring about similar ecclesiastical changes as are above described. **3. **Declare a general amnesty and restitution of ecclesiastical property. The year 1618 was' agreed upon as the year to whose conditions a return should be *made; *but in the application of this rule important exceptions were made, *by *which the Roman Catholic party was benefited. A majority of the electors was secured to this party; a portion of the Palatinate was transferred to Bavaria in the same interest; and a somewhat similar disposition was made of Baden-Durlach. In the hereditary states of Austria the amnesty was practically deprived of all effect by the numerous clauses and provisos with which it was hampered. Würtemberg, on the other band, secured the return of all Church property of which it had been deprived as a Protestant state. Mecklenburg also, and a number of estates which had been excepted from the amnesty of Prague, were benefited by the, Treaty of Westphalia. A special provision ordered that the ecclesiastical status of all adherents to the Augsburg Confession should be conformed to the conditions of 1624. **4. **Arrange for the removal of occasions for dispute between churches. To this end the treaty of Passau (1552) and the religious peace of Augsburg were ratified, adherents to the Reformed confessions were accorded equal recognition with Lutherans and Roman Catholics, and the rights of Protestants and Roman Catholics were placed upon an equal footing; the right to the possession of church property was accorded to the party which held such property on Jan. 1, 1624; the traditional right of reformation within their own territories claimed by rulers was regulated, and also the status of persons who belonged to one Church while the government under which they lived adhered to another faith; and the limits of ecclesiastical jurisdiction were particularly defined. **5. **Do away with political abuses growing out of the preference previously accorded the Roman Catholic over the Protestant Church. The according of territorial sovereignty to the different rulers impaired the *summum imperium *previously inscribed to the emperor, especially as similar rights and privileges were bestowed on the cities, etc., of the empire ("communnitatibus etpagisimmediatis"). **6. **Take measures for tile execution of the treaty and the preservation of the peace. The emperor issued edicts designed to give effect to the treaty Nov. 7, 1648, and the parties to the treaty exchanged the documents involved in its consummation Feb. 8,1649. The leaders of the respective armies also had, since the close of 1648, conducted negotiations at Prague looking towards a realization of the peace, and this led to a congress at Nuremberg at which the three estates of the empire (electors, princes, and cities) were represented and which passed, June 16, 1650, a general recess of execution. The papal legate, cardinal Fabius Chigi, had protested against the peace, Oct. 14 and 26, and Innocent X followed with the *bull Zelo Domus Dei *of Nov. 26, 1648. It is asserted that these protests were only designed to perform a duty, which the pope owed to his position and his conscience, since they could under no circumstances exercise authoritative influence over the execution of the peace. The treaty was confirmed by the diet of-1654 and often afterwards. Its execution was, as respects particulars, secured only through many disputes, and its provisions have often been violated; but it has preserved its authority in general down to the present day. The very copious literature may be found collected in the list of Pitter, in *Literatur d. Staatsrechts, *2, 420 sq., 492 sq.; 3, 69 sq.; 4:128 sq., 140; id. *Geist d. westphal. Friedens, *p. 77, a complement of Senckenberg, *Darst. d. westphdl. Friedens *(Frankfort-on-the-Main, 1804);. Woltmann, *Gesch. d. westphdl. Friedens *(Leips.1808, 2 vols. 8vo). For sources see Meiern, *Acta Pacis Publica. oder. westphil.. Friedensverhandliungen u. Geschichte *(Hanov and Gött. 1734-36); id. *Acta Pacis Execut. Publica, *etc. (Nuremb. 1736 sq.), and index to both collections; id. *Acta Comitalia* *Ratisbon. Anno *1654 (1738 sq.); id. *Instrumenta Pacis, *etc. (Gött. 1738 fol.), preface; *Urkunden der Friedensschliisse zu Münster u. Os'iabriick, *etc. (Zurich, 1848). — Herzog, *Real Encyklop., s.v.*
WETENHALL (OR WETTENHALL), EDWARD Wetenhall (or Wettenhall), Edward

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wetenhall (or Wettenhall), Edward an English *clergyman, *was born at Lichfield in 1636. He was educated at Cambridge and Oxford; became rector of Lincoln College, Oxford; minister of Longcombe; canon residentiary of Exeter in 1667; removed to Ireland in 1672; became bishop of Cork and Ross iun1678; was translated to Kilmore in 1699; and died in London in 1713. He published, *Method and Order for Private devotion *(1666): *— Scripture Authentic and Faith Certain: — View of Our Lord's Passion *(1710): — and other works. See Allibone, *Dict. of Brit and A mer. Authors, *s.v.
WETHERELL, WILLIAM Wetherell, William

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wetherell, William an English clergyman, was born in 1600, and became minister at Scituate in 1640, in which capacity he continued until his death in 1684.
WETHERILL, SAMUEL Wetherill, Samuel

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wetherill, Samuel a preacher of the Society of Free Quakers, was born at Burlington, N. J., in 1713, and removed to Philadelphia in early youth, where he spent the remainder of his life. He was a prominent manufacturer of that city as well as a preacher. He wrote, *An Apology for the Religious Society called Free Quakers: — *a tract on the *Divinity of Christ*, and other works. See Allibone, *Dict. of Brit and Amer. Authors, *s.v.
WETMORE, IZRAHIAH Wetmore, Izrahiah

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wetmore, Izrahiah an American clergyman, was born in 1729. He graduated at Yale College in 1748; became minister at Huntington, Conn.; and died in 1798. See Allibone, *Dict. of Brit and Amer. Authors, s.v. *Wetmore, James, a Protestant Episcopal clergyman, was graduated from Yale College in 1714. He was ordained the first Congregational minister in North Haven, Conn., in November, 1718, but in September, 1722, declared in favor of the Church of England, He immediately went to England, obtained orders and returned in 1723 as catechist and assistant to the Rev. William Vesey of New York. In 1726 he became rector of the Church at Rye. N. Y., where he continued until his death, May 15, 1760. He published *Quakerism a* *Judicial Infatuation, *and other controversial works. See Sprague, *Annals of the Amer. Pulpit, 5, *16.
WETTE, WILHELM MARTIN LEBERECHT DE Wette, Wilhelm Martin Leberecht De

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wette, Wilhelm Martin Leberecht de an eminent German theologian and critic, was born Jan. 12, 1780, at Ulla, near Weimar, where his father, John Augustin, was pastor. He began his pursuit of learning at a time when German literature was in its highest glory, and in a region where its foremost representatives sojourned. In the school at Buttstadt he was greatly embarrassed by lack of money. Thence he went to the gymnasium at Weimar, where Bittiger was rector and Herder ephorus. His theological course was taken at Jena, where Griesbach, sand still more Paulus, exercised a stimulating influence over him, and developed in him a taste for independent study of the Scriptures. De Wette's earliest essay in literature was a critical dissertation on the book of Deuteronomy (Jena, 1805), and his next, *Contributions to New- Test. Introduction (Beiträge zür Einleitung in das N.T.). *In these works De Wette abandoned the attempt to explain the miracles of Scripture as natural occurrences, and took the ground that they are mythical events. To establish this position he undertook to show that the historical books of the Bible are of much more recent origin than ecclesiastical tradition teaches; that especially the Pentateuch is composed of fragments, the earliest of which originated in the time of David, and the latest, the book of Deuteronomy itself, in the reign of Josiah; and that many persons were engaged in the compilation of these books. As J. S. Vater, of Halle, had just published similar opinions, De Wette was obliged to revise' his book and delay its publication until 1806, when the first volume *of Beitrdgein's Alte. Test. *appeared. The second volume appeared in 1807, and was remarkable for its development of the theory that the Chronicles are not drawn from the same source in which the books of Samuel and Kings originate; but that the writer of the Chronicles had made use of Samuel and Kings so far as they could serve his purpose, and had arbitrarily altered and made additions to them in the interests of the Levitical hierarchy; and for the manner in which these conclusions are made to react upon the credibility of the Pentateuch. He nevertheless persisted in maintaining the sacredness of the Scripture histories, even in their mythical form, and insisted that no miserable pragmatism should be allowed to destroy their sacredness. He declared truth to be the great law of history, and the love of truth to be the historian's first qualification; but truth was for him an ideal, poetic abstraction, which had no place either in the rationalism or the supernaturalism of those days. His views upon this subject are given in the article *Beiträge zür Charakteristik des Hebraismus, *in the *Studien, *which he edited in common with Creuzer and Daub (1807). He places himself on the side of those who believe in revealed religion, and regards Christ as the true Redeemer and the central fact in revelation. In 1807 De Wette became professor of theology at Heidelberg after having served as tutor at Jena, and having received the doctorate of philosophy. In 1811 he published a commentary on the book of Psalms (editions in 1823, 1829, and 1836), in which he denied the Davidic authorship of a number of psalms previously ascribed to David; applied the references made in certain psalms, by the current exegesis, to the person of Christ to less distant historical events; and assigned a later date than was usually assumed to the Psalms generally. He was himself constrained to feel that his work was not conducive to devotional effects, and subsequently modified many of its statements, besides writing a supplement on the devotional exposition of Psalms (Heidelb. 1837). He demands a strictly scientific exposition, and emphatically denounces all "play of pious ingenuity." Christ is, in his view, not foretold as a historical personage in the Psalms, though many ideal descriptions are there furnished which may be utilized for Christological purposes. In 1810 he was called to the then newly founded University of Berlin, where Schleiermacher became his colleague and his colaborer in the endeavor to secure a theology which might satisfy the demands of both faith and science, though they differed widely as respects the application of methods. Schleiermacher insisted on a strict separation of philosophy from theology, yet persistently made use of philosophy; De Wette, on the other hand, proceeded from the theistic standpoint of Kant's criticism, and also coincided with Jacobi in his theory of the feelings in religion. In methodology he wholly followed the philosophy of Fries. Knowledge and faith are by him sharply distinguished from each other the former being a matter of the understanding, and being concerned with finite things only. Infinite things are to be apprehended by faith acting under the form of feeling (devotion, enthusiasm, resignation). The religious consciousness is accordingly aesthetical in character. The infinite is symbolically manifested in the finite, and the historical revelation must be conceived of, in consequence, as a symbol. This he held to be true of miracles also. De Wette's critical labors, in this period of his life, extended beyond the limits of exegesis and reached over into systematic theology. In 1817 he published the *Lehrbuch der hist. krit. Einleitung in die kanon. u. Apocryph. Bücher des Alten Test., *which may be regarded as the consummation of his critical progress. It passed through seven editions, and was rated by De Wette as the most finished of the productions of his pen. In 1826 the complementary *Einleitung in das Neue Test. *appeared (6th ed. 1860). Earlier than both of these *Introductions *was his *Lehrbuch der heb. jüd. Archäologie, *etc. (Leips. 1814, 1830, 1842); and earlier still the *Commentatio de Morte Jesu Christi Expiatoria *(1813). In this, his first book in doctrinal theology, he assailed the orthodox view of the atonement from a new direction. He represented the death of Jesus as the unavoidable consequence of his moral action, and as unexpected, but grandly met when it was at hand. The philosophical principles on which De Wette's theological system was built are developed best of all in his little work *Ueber Religion u. Theologie, *etc. (Berlin, 1818 and 1821). The first part of his book on Christian doctrine appeared in 1813, and was devoted to Bible doctrines and pervaded by the principle of "historical development." In 1816 he published part 2, on ecclesiastical doctrines. In Bible doctrine he distinguished between Hebraism and Judaism in the Old Test., aid the teaching of Jesus and the teaching of thee apostles in the New. Church doctrine was not, to his thinking, a finished product, which could undergo no alteration and be developed no further; he saw in it simply a bond of union which binds together those who are members of the Church, but which deserves the attention of the theologian despite every advance that may be male. The presentation of Church doctrine however, in these books, was simply that of the Lutheran Church. The author's own system was not given to the public until 1846. In 1819 the *Lehrbuch der Logmatik *w as followed by a *Christliche Sittenlehre (Christian Ethics) *in two parts, the former of which contained the system of ethics, and the latter the history of ethics. In this book De Wette turned aside from the beaten track, in that he did not regard Christian ethics as a mere aggregation of moral prescriptions, but as a life having its root in a Christian disposition if the heart. His views in this field are still further exhibited in the article *Kritische Uebersicht der Ausbildung der theolog. Sieileadre in der einagel. luth. Kirche seit Caliatus, *in the *Theolor. Zeitsckrift *of 1819 and 1820 (edited by himself, Schleiermacher, and Licke). His published views upon this subject fairly reflected his own theological character. He combined in himself most intimately the scientific and the practical ethical character. His whole being was enlisted in the endeavor to work a moral renovation of the German people, and a restoration, on a large scale, of a Christian community in the land. Unable to use this pulpit, he drew up a number of pamphlets and articles for periodicals (1815-19), which were very influential and became quite popular. This constant endeavor to introduce his ethical views into the relations of practical life brought upon him the censure of the government on the occasion when the Erlangen theological student Karl Sand, a member of the Jena *Burschenschaft *as well, startled the German world by assassinating the dramatist August von Kotzebue under the impulse of an enthusiastic patriotism (March 23, 1819). Kotzebue had been strongly opposed to the success of the liberal movement then being made. De Wette addressed to the mother of this misguided youth a paper in which he condemned the murder as illegal, immoral, and antagonistic to all moral law, but at the same time characterized the motives from which the action sprang as a most encouraging sign of the times; in explication of which idea he afterwards adduced Jean Paul's judgment of Charlotte Corday. In consequence of having written this letter he was, despite the intervention of the academical senate in his behalf, dismissed from his professorship by command of the king. Oct. 2, 1819. He declined a sum of money offered him in compensation, and retired to Weimar to undertake an edition of Luther's writings *(Luther's Briefe, Sendschreiben und Bedeunken), *of which vol. 1 appeared in 1825, and the final volume (5) in 1828. A supplementary volume was published by Seidenmann in 1856. This was the first comprehensive and complete edition of Luther's works ever published, and was of itself sufficient to earn for its author the fame of scholarship. In 1822 he published the didactic romance *Theodor, oder des Zweiflers Weihe, *to which Tholuck replied in 1823 with *his Wahre Weihe des Zweiflers.* In 1821 measures were taken by St. Catharine's Church in Brunswick to secure De Wette as its pastor; but, before the arrangement was completed, a call to the theological professorship of Basle was extended, which he accepted. Here he not only taught to the great satisfaction of students, but also lectured in weekly evening assemblies where the cultured people of the place were his constant auditors. In this way he covered a course of ethics, and another on the nature, manifestations, and influence of religion; both of which were published (Berlin, 1823 sq and 1827). He also gave himself steadily to pulpit labor, in which he had never regularly engaged during his earlier years, and published: five volumes of sermons (1825-29), which were supplemented by a sixth volume published after his death (1849). He was, however; simply a teacher in the pulpit — never an orator; and yet the pulpit reacted upon the lecture-room, and led him into the study of theoretical homiletics, the fruit of which appears in his valuable work *Andeutungen fiber Bildusag u. Berufsthitigkeit der Geistlichen; *etc. He also attempted catechetical works, but without gaining the popular ear. During De Wette's stay at Basle the practical element in his character was more energetically developed, and introduced a noteworthy change in his religious life. He learned, in contact with different people, to appreciate various forms of religious manifestation which had formerly repelled him, and his polemical tendency gave way to an irenical disposition as his years advanced. He instituted a *Griechenverein *in 1825, whose object was the advancement of the moral and religious welfare of the newly liberated Greeks, and aided in the founding of a branch *Gustav Adolf Verein *for Switzerland *(Protestant. — kirchl. Hülfsverein). *He was charged, in consequence, with being a convert to ecclesiastical orthodoxy; but there is abundant evidence that he never changed the views he had adopted in earlier life. He persisted in advocating the utmost independence in theological thinking, and in regarding religion as a life rather than a creed; but testified that he knew "that none other name under heaven is given among men whereby we must be saved but that of Jesus, the Crucified One." In addition to his professional employments, De Wette took an amateur interest in art. He did not condemn the drama as immoral, and had even published a drama of his own construction (Berlin, 1823), though moral considerations prevented him from visiting the theatre. He loved music and the formative arts, and impressed their importance on the thought of his students. He wrote a second romance, and published it in 1829 *(Heinrich.Melchthal, oder Bildung u. Genmeingeist *[2 vols.]). A visit to Rome in the winter of 1846 was largely devoted to the study of ecclesiastical art, and gave birth to the attractive book *Gedanmken iiber falerei u. Baukunst, besonders in kirchl.* *Beziehung *(Berlin, 1846). De Wette's chief occupation, however, was, always theology, and his years at Basle were fruitful in theological publications from his hand. He thoroughly revised his version of the Bible, wrote the *Einleitung is NV., *constructed a mass of text-books and articles for periodicals, and crowned his exegetical labors especially with the *Kurzgefisstes exeget. Handb. zum N.T. *(3 vols. in 11 pts. 1836-48). He possessed in an unusual measure the power of condensed yet precise statement, and evinced it here as in all his works. This commentary was, contemporary with Strauss's *Lebeun Jesu, *and the author did not hesitate to avow, in his preface to Matthew, his sympathy with Strauss in that writer's opposition to old and new "harmonistics," and in his advocacy of an idealistic and symbolical interpretation of the miracles of Scripture, though he believed that Strauss had gone too far in giving up the historical Jesus. De Wette was twice invited back to Germany, once to become pastor of St. Peter's in Hamburg, and again to accept a professorship at Jena, but declined to return thither. He died, after a brief illness, June 16, 1849. His likeness in oil by Dietter, and his bust by Schlth, ornament the aula at Basle. Concerning De Wette's life and works, see Hagenbach (for many years his *colleague), Leichenrede *(Basle, 1849), and *Akadem. Geddchtnissrede *(Leips. 1850); Schenkel (a pupil of De *W.), De W. u. d. Bedeutung seiner Theologie, *etc. (Schaffhausen, 1849); Lucke, *De W., zur freundschaftl. Erinnerung *(Hamb. 1850); Thillden, in *Nekrolog der Deutschen, *1849, p. 427 sq.; Brocklhaus, *Conversations-Lexikon, s.v.; Biographie Universelle, *s.v. With reference to his theology, see Baur, *Kirchengesch. d. 19ten Jahrhunderts *(Tüb. 1862), p. 212 sq.; Kahnis, *D. innere Gang d. deutsch. Protestantismus *(Leips. 1860). Respecting De Wette's merits as a critic and expositor, see the various introductions to Scripture, particularly Bleek's, and the commentaries. — Herzog. *Real-Encyklop. s.v.*
WETTENGEL, FRIEDRICH TRAUGOTT Wettengel, Friedrich Traugott

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wettengel, Friedrich Traugott a Protestant theologian of-Germany, was born Feb. 9, 1750, at Asch, in Bohemia. He studied at Jena and Erlangen. In 1775 he was appointed chaplain to the prince of Reuss, Heinrich XI; in 1780 he was made court preacher, ands in 1792 superintendent. He died at Greitz, June 24, 1824. Of his writings we mention, *Predigten fiber die Reden Jesu Christi am Kreuz *(Erlangen, 1779): *— Sind die synbolischen Biicher ein Joch fiur die freie evangelisch-lutherische Kirche? *(Greitz, 1790). See Döring, *Die gelehrten Theologen Deutschlands, *4:710 sq.; Winer, *Handbuch der theol. Lit. *1, 334, 494; 2, 388. (B. P.)
WETTSTEIN (OFTEN WRITTEN WETSTEIN), JOHANN RUDOLF (I) Wettstein (Often Written Wetstein), Johann Rudolf (I)

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wettstein (often written Wetstein), Johann Rudolf (I) a learned Swiss theologian (son of the state minister of the same name), was born at Basle, Jan. 5, 1614. He devoted himself chiefly to the classical languages. After a short term as preacher at Basle, he became professor of rhetoric, and in 1637 of Greek, from which he passed in 1644 to the chair of logic, and again in 1656 to that of theology, from which he was finally transferred in 1656 to the department of New-Test. interpretation. He died Dec. 11,1684, leaving several theological works, for which see Hoefer, *Nouv. Biog. Géneralé. s.v.*
WETTSTEIN, JOHANN JAKOB Wettstein, Johann Jakob

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wettstein, Johann Jakob a celebrated New Test. critic, was born at Basle, March 5, 1693, the second in a family of thirteen children. His father was minister in St. Leonard's Church, and his teachers were the younger Buxtorf, Samuel Werenfels, Iselin, Frey, etc. His attention was early turned upon the manuscripts in the public library and the comparison of codices, and his earliest dissertation had for its subject *De Vatiis N.T. Lectionibus. *Travels to Geneva, Lyons, Paris, and England, in connection with which he visited all accessible libraries and made himself acquainted with all the more important manuscripts of the New Test., served to enlarge the range of his views, as did also association with Montfaucon, La Rue, and Bentley. He obtained a chaplaincy in a Dutch regiment of Switzers through Bentley's influence, but in 1717 returned to Basle and was made *diaconus communis, *and in 1720 deacon of St. Leonard's and assistant, to his father. In this station he earned the reputation of al able preacher and faithful pastor; but study being his favorite occupation, he read private lectures on exegesis and systematic theology before a class of young men, and gave his spare moments to the continued comparison of manuscripts in the library. He conceived in this period the idea of publishing a critical edition of the New Test. Iselin and Frey were at the same time studying the codices of the Basle Library for the purpose of aiding Bengel in the preparation of his *New Test., *and Wettstein came into conflict with them respecting the age of the-Basle Codex of the Gospels (E), which he believed to be much lower than they would; concede. This dispute soon became personal. Wettstein's orthodoxy had for some time been suspected. He was charged with holding Arian and Socinian errors, and to this fault were now added his alleged critical aberrations. His preference of ὅγ to θεός in 1Ti 3:16, on the ground that a careful examination of the Cod. Alexandrin had convinced him of its genuineness, was credited to an alleged desire of depriving the doctrine of Christ's deity of a proof. Complaints respecting his heterodoxy were expressed even in the Diet of the Confederation, and ultimately a formal process of inquisition was inaugurated against him. Wettstein had taken the precaution, however, to send the manuscript of his *New Test. *to Holland, and his assailants were accordingly compelled to substantiate their charges from the notes of his pupils, and from the memories of those who had heard him preach. He was ultimately dismissed from his post, May 13, 1730. He found anew place at Amsterdam, as successor to Clericus in the College of the Remonstrants, and thenceforward made Holland his home. The *Prolegomena *to his *New Test. *had already been issued anonymously in 1730. In 1751-52 appeared the *New Test. *itself, the work of his life; but such was the timidity of the age that he was compelled to state the readings he preferred in foot-notes, and to give the received text in the body of his work. William Bowyer, of London, first published a New Test. with Wettstein's improvements in 1763. It contained a wealth of various readings, numerous antiquarian remarks illustrative of the subject-matter, and parallel passages from classical, ecclesiastical, and Rabbinical writers, which made it a valuable aid both to exegesis and criticism. I Wettstein had appended to his *New Test. *two Syriac letters discovered by him and credited to Clemens Romanus, but whose genuineness has since been disproved (the letters to *virgins). *He earned the reputation of having excelled all his predecessors in the industry and exactness with which le prosecuted the comparison of, codices, having personally examined about forty. To him we owe the designation of codices now current in the theological world. He did not long outlive the publication of his book, and died March 22, 1754. His colleague, Jacob Krighont, delivered a funeral discourse over his remains, which led to a dispute between himself and Frey, of Basle. Previous to his death, Wettstein had been made a member of academies of science in Berlin and London, and of the British Society for the Extension of Christianity. See *Athen. Raer. — *p. 379 sq.; Meister, *Helvet. Scenen d. neueirn Schwlermerei u. Intoleranz *(Zurich, 1785), p. 167 sq.; Hagenbach, *Weffstein. u. seine Gegner, *in Illgen's *Zeitschrift. hist. Theol. *1839, No. 1, p. 13; Herzog, *Real-Encyklop. s.v. *Wetzel, Andreas, a Lutheran minister of Germany, was born Jan. 17, 1808, at Well, in Würtemberg. He studied at Tübingen, and in 1831 he arrived in the United States. In Lewis County, N. Y., he commenced his ministerial labors with great success, looking at the same time after his coreligionists in Oneida County. In 1832 he also commenced preaching at Utica. In 1844, the congregation organized there built a church — Zion's Church — and in 1845 Mr. Wetzel left Verona, where he had resided, for Utica, where he labored until the year 1879, when bodily infirmities obliged him to retire from his office. He died Aug. 16,1880. Mr. Wetzel was highly honored in his ecclesiastical body, in which he held for a great many years the office of treasurer. . He also promoted the cause of education within, his own Church and the community in which he lived, and took an active part in all movements which tended to elevate the moral standard of the people. (B.P.)
WETTSTEIN, JOHANN RUDOLF (2) Wettstein, Johann Rudolf (2)

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wettstein, Johann Rudolf (2) a Swiss theologian, son of the preceding, was born at Basle, Sept. 1, 1647, and died there, April 24, 1711, as professor of theology (after 1685), leaving the following writings: *Origen's Dial. c. Marcionit. Exhortatio ad Martyrium, Responsio ad Africani Epist. de Hist. Susanna Gr. et Lat. cum Notis Edidit *(Basle, 1674): — his *Deputatio de Prophetis *is published in *Nov. Lit. Helmst. *(1702), p. 127. See Winer, *Handbuch der theol. Lit. *1, 899; Ftirst, *Bibl. Jud. *3, 510; Hoefer, *Nouv. Biog. Géneralé, s.v. *(B. P.),
WETZEL (OR WEZEL), JOHANN KASPAR Wetzel (or Wezel), Johann Kaspar

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wetzel (or Wezel), Johann Kaspar a learned German writer, was born at Meiningen, Feb 22, 1691 as the son of a poor shoemaker. He was educated at the expense of Bernard, the duke of Saxe-Meiningen, at Halle and Jena. After teaching awhile, he became secretary to a diplomat, and in that capacity visited Italy and Switzerland. He eventually taught again privately, and finally became preacher of the duchess-dowager (1724) and at Romhild (1728), where he died, Aug. 6, 1755, leaving several works, of which we mention, *hymnopeographia, oder hist. Lebensbeschreibung der beriihmtesten Liederdichter *(Herrnstadt, 1719-28, 4 pts.) *Hymnologia Sacra *(Nuremb. 1728): *— Hymnologia Passionalis *(ibid. *1733): — Hymnologia Polenmica *(Arnstadt, 1735): *— Analecta hymanicad, oder merkwürdige Nachlesen zür Liederhistorie *(Gotha, 1751-55, 2 vols.). See Döring, *Die gelehrter Theologen Deutschlands, *4:712 sq.; Hoefer. *Nouv. Biog. Géneralé, *s.v. (B. P.)
WETZER, HEINRICH JOSEPH Wetzer, Heinrich Joseph

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wetzer, Heinrich Joseph chief editor of the *Encyclopedia of Roman, Catholic Theology, *was born in 1801 at Anzefahr, in Electoral,Hesse. His early instruction was obtained of pastor Kaiser, at Niederklein; thence he went to the Psedagogium, and subsequently (1820) to the University of Marburg. Under Arnold's and Hartmann's tuition, he devoted himself especially to the study of the Hebrew and Arabic languages. In 1823 he was at Tübingen, engaged in the study of Oriental languages, and in 1824 he received at Freiburg the doctorate of theology and canon law. He then visited Paris, and prosecuted the study of Arabic and Persian under De Sacy, and of Syriac under Quatremere. While in Paris he published from an Arabic manuscript *The History of' the Coptic Christians down to the 14th Century *(1828), as written by a learned imaum of Egypt, accompanying the Arabic text with a Latin version. He had already published *A Latin Treatise on the Arian, Controversy, A.D. *325-350 (1827). In 1828 he became tutor and extraordinary professor, and in 1830 ordinary professor, of Oriental philology at Freiburg. In 1831 he married. He delivered interesting lectures on the grammar of the Hebrew and Arabic languages, and on the interpretation of Scripture and introduction to the Old Test. etc. In 1840 he published, in connection with L. Van Ess, the Sulzbach edition of the Bible. In the internal disputes which agitated the University of Freiburg, he held strictly Roman Catholic ground. When in 1844 a motion was made in the Chambers of Baden to discontinue that institution of learning, ho wrote an essay advocating its preservation. His principal importance, however, grows out of the assent he gave to the plan of publishing a cyclopedia of Roman Catholic theology, as conceived by the bookseller Herder. He was given the direction of the work, and industriously prosecuted it from 1846 until his death in November, 1853. The work is thoroughly Roman Catholic in tone and spirit, and has doubtless contributed greatly towards fixing the tendency of that theology of late years in Germany. Its treatment of Protestantism, the institutions growing out of it, and the men connected with it is naturally biased; but its polemics are never bitter or extreme. Significant are the brevity and superficial treatment accorded to Sailer (q.v.), and curious the mildness which Fenelon's mystical quietism receives in the article "Bossnet." The immaculate conception of the Virgin is not at all approved of, though it was not yet a dogma of the Church when the *Encyclopaedia *appeared. The entire work, including Supplement, consists of 12 volumes (1847-1856). A complete Index facilitates its use. A new edition is at this writing (1881) in course of publication. — Herzog, *Real- Encyklop. s.v.*
WEXFORD, COIUNCIL OF (CONCILIUM WEXFORDIENSE) Wexford, Coiuncil of (Concilium Wexfordiense)

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wexford, Coiuncil Of (Concilium Wexfordiense) Wexford is a seaport town of Ireland, capital of Wexford County, on the right bank of the Slaney, where it expands, into a harbor, sixty-four miles south-west of Dublin. An ecclesiastical council was held here in 1240 by the bishop of Ferns, in which it was ruled how the debts of deceased curates should be paid.: Clerks were forbidden to follow any kind of secular business. The infringers of ecclesiastical liberties, intruders into benefices, incendiaries, poisoners, false, witnesses, etc., were excommunicated. Curates were forbidden to excommunicate their parishioners without the bishop's sanction. See Wilkins, *Conc. *1. 681; Mansi, *Concil. *(suppl.), 2, 1065, Landon, *Manual of Councils, *p. 691.
WEZEL Wezel

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wezel *SEE WETZEL*.
WHALE Whale

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Whale the rendering in the A. V. (besides κῆτος*, *Mt 12:40) of two very closely related Heb. terms: תָּן, *tan *(or rather תִּנַּים, *tannim', *as a sing., Eze 32:2; "dragon," 29:3; elsewhere as a plural and rendered "dragons," Job 30:29; Ps 44; Ps 19; Isa 13:22; Isa 34:13; Isa 35:7; Isa 42; Isa 20; Jer 9:11; Jer 10:22; Jer 14:6; Jer 49; Jer 33; Jer 51; Jer 37), and תִּנַּין, *tannnin' *(Ge 1; Ge 21; Job 7:12; "serpent," Ex 7:9-10,12; "sea- monster," La 4:3; elsewhere also "dragon," De 32:33; Ne 2:13; Ps 74:13; Ps 91:13; Ps 148:7; Isa 27:1; Isa 51; Isa 9; Jer 51:34). The texts where these are used in general present pictures of ruined cities and of desolation in the wilderness, rendering it difficult to determine what kind of creatures in particular are meant, except as may be inferred from other passages (Job 30:29; Ps 44:19-20; Isa 13:22; Isa 34:13; Isa 35; Isa 7; Jer 9; Jer 11; Jer 10; Jer 22; Jer 49; Jer 33; Jer 51; Jer 34; Jer 37). Where the term is associated with beasts or birds of the desert, it clearly indicates serpents of various species, both small and large (Isa 43; Isa 20; Ps 91:13; also Ex 6:9-12), and in one passage a poisonous reptile is distinctly referred to (De 32:33). *SEE SERPENT*. In Jer 14:6, where wild asses snuffing up the wind are compared to dragons, the image will appear in its full strength, if we understand by dragons great *boas *and *python-serpents, *such as are figured in the Presenting mosaics. They were common in ancient times, and are still far from rare in the tropics of both continents. Several of the species grow to an enormous size, and, during their periods of activity, are in the habit of raising a considerable portion of their length into a vertical position, like pillars, ten or twelve feet high, in order to survey the vicinity above the surrounding bushes, while with open jaws they drink in a quantity of the current air. The same character exists in smaller serpents; but it is not obvious, unless when, threatening to strike, they stand on end nearly three fourths of their length. Most, if not all, of these species are mute, or can utter only a hissing sound; and, although the *malli-pambu, *the great rock -snake of Southern Asia, is said to wail in the night, no naturalist has ever witnessed such a phenomenon, nor heard it asserted that any other boa, python, or serpent had a real voice; but they hiss, and, like crocodiles, may utter sounds somewhat akin to howling, a fact that will sufficiently explain the passage in Micah (Mic 1:8). When used in connection with rivers, the term probably signifies the crocodile (Ps 74:13; Isa 27:1; Isa 51; Isa 9; Eze 29:3; Eze 32:2), and when allusion is had to larger bodies of water, probably some of the cetaceous mammalia (Ge 1; Ge 21; Ps 148:7; La 4:3). *SEE LEVIATHAN*. The above interpretation is according to that of Bochart *(Hieroz. *2, 429), who proposes always to read תִּנַּין in the sense of huge serpents; but others, following Rab. Tafichum Hieros., suggest a different etymology for the plur. forms תִּנַּים and תִּנַּין (the isolated case of a sing. form תִּנַּים, in, Eze 29:3, being taken for a corrupt reading for תִּנַּין, as in some MSS.), from the root תָּנִן, in the tropical sense of *stretched *out in running, and applied to the *jackal, *a swift animal, which answers well to the description where these forms occur, being a creature living in deserts (Ps 44:19; Isa 13:22; Isa 34:13; Isa 35:7; Isa 43; Isa 20; Jer 9:11; Jer 10:22; Jer 14:6; Jer 49; Jer 33; Jer 51; Jer 37), suckling its young (La 4:3), and uttering a wailing cry (Job 20:29; Mic 1:8). The other passages in which the forms, sing. תִּנַּין, plur. תִּנַּינַים, occur are thus left to be explained as before, namely, as signifying, **(1) **a great fish or *sea-monster, *e.g. a whale, shark, etc. (Ge 1:21; Job 7:12; Isa 27:1; Ps 145:3,7.); **(2) **a *serpent, *either in general (Ex 7:9-12; De 32; De 33; Ps 91:13), or specially a "dragon" (Jer 51; Jer 34), or the *crocodile *(Ps 74:13), put as a symbol of Egypt (Eze 29:3, according to the true reading; also 32:2). *SEE DRAGON*. "In the passages where scales and feet are mentioned as belonging to the *tan, *commentators have shown that 'the crocodile is intended, which then is synonymous with the leviathan; and, they have endeavored also to demonstrate, where *tannin *draw the dugs to suckle their young, that seals are meant, although cetacea nourish theirs in a similar manner. It may be doubted whether in most of the cases the poetical diction points absolutely to any specific animal, particularly as there is more force and grandeur in a generalized and collective image of the huge monsters of the deep, not inappropriately so called, than in the restriction to any one species, since all are in Ge 1:26 made collectively subservient to the supremacy of man. But criticism is still more inappropriate when, not contented with pointing to some assumed species, it attempts to rationalize miraculous events by such arguments; as in the case of Jonah, where the fact of whales having a small gullet and not being found in the Mediterranean is adduced to prove that the huge fish דָּג*, dâg, *was not a cetacean, but a shark! Now, if the text be literally taken, the transaction is plainly miraculous, and no longer within the sphere of zoological discussion; and if it be allegorical, as some, we think, erroneously assume, then, whether the prophet was saved by means of a kind of boat called *dâg, *or it be a mystical account of initiation where the neophite was detained three days in an ark or boat figuratively denominated a fish, or Celtic *avanc, *the transaction is equally indeterminate; and it assuredly would be derogating from the high dignity of the prophet's mission to convert the event into a mere escape by boat or into a pagan legend such as Hercules, Bacchus, Jemshfd, and other deified heroes of the remotest antiquity are fabled to have undergone, and which all the ancient mysteries, including the Druidical, symbolized. It may be observed, besides, of cetaceous animals that, though less frequent in the Mediterranean than in the ocean, they are far from being unknown there. Joppa, now Jaffa, the very place whence Jonah set sail, displayed for ages in one of its pagan temples huge bones of a species of whale, which the legends of the place pretended were those of the dragon monster slain by Perseus, as represented in the Arkite mythus of that hero and Andromeda, and which remained in that spot till the conquering Romans carried them in triumph to the great city. Procopius mentions a huge sea-monster in the Propontis, taken during his prefecture of Constantinople, in the 36th year of Justinian (A.D. 562), after having destroyed vessels at certain intervals for more than fifty years. Rondoletius enumerates several whales stranded or taken on the coasts of the Mediterranean; these were most likely all *orcas, physeters, or canpedolios, *i.e. toothed whales, as large and more fierce than the *nysticetes, *which have balein in: the mouth, and at present very rarely make their way farther south than the Bay of Biscay; though in early times it is probable they visited the Mediterranean, since they have been seen within the tropics. In the Syrian seas, the Belgian pilgrim Lavaers, on his passage from Malta to Palestine, incidentally mentions a 'Tonynvisch,' which he further denominates an oil-fish, longer than the vessel, leisurely swimming along, and which the seamen said prognosticated bad weather. On the island of Zerbi, close to the African coast, the late Commander Davies, R.N., found the bones of a cachalot on the beach. Shaw mentions an orca more than sixty feet in length stranded at Algiers; and the late Admiral Ross Donelly saw one in the Mediterranean near the island of Albaran. There are, besides, numerous sharks of the largest species in the seas of the Levant, and also in the Arabian Gulf and Red Sea, as well as cetacea, of which *Balcena bitan *is the largest in those seas, and two species of *halicore *or *dugong, *which are herbivorous animals, intermediate between whales and seals. Much criticism has been expended on the scriptural account of Jonah being swallowed by a large fish; it has been variously understood as a literal transaction, as an entire fiction or an allegory, as a poetical mythus or a parable. With regard to the remarks of those writers who ground their objections upon the *denial of miracle, *it is obvious that this is not the place for discussion; the question of Jonah in the fish's belly will share the same fate as any other miracle recorded in the Old Test. (See Herttenstein, De *Pisce qui Jonam Devoravit *[Vitemb. 1705].) The reader will find in Rosenmüller's *Prolegomena *several attempts by various writers to explain the scriptural narrative, none of which, however, have anything to recommend them, unless it be in some cases the ingenuity of the authors,; 'such as, for instance, that of Godfrey Less, who supposed that the fish' was no animal at all, but a ship with the figure of a fish painted on the stern, into which Jonah was received after he had been cast out of his own vessel! Equally curious is the explanation of G. C. Anton, who endeavored to solve the difficulty by supposing that just as the prophet was thrown into the water, the dead carcass of some large fish floated by, into the belly of which he contrived to get, and that thus he was drifted to the shore! The opinion of Rosenmüller, that the whole account is founded on the Phoenician fable of Hercules devoured by a sea- monster sent by Neptune (Lycophron, *Cassand *33), although sanctioned by Gesenius, Winer, Ewald, and other German writers, is opposed to all sound principles of Biblical exegesis. It will be our purpose to consider what portion of the occurrence partakes of a natural and what of a miraculous nature. In the first place, then, it is necessary to observe that the Greek word κῆτος*, *used by Matthew, is not restricted in its meaning to 'a whale,' or any cetacean; like the Latin *cete *or *cetus, *it may denote any sea-monster, either 'a whale,' or 'a shark,' or a 'seal,' or 'a tummy of enormous size' (see Athen. p. 303 b [ed. Dindorf]; *Odys. *12:97; 4:446, 452; *Iliad, 20:*147). Although two or three species of whale are found in the Mediterranean Sea, yet the 'great fish' that swallowed the prophet cannot properly be identified .with any cetacean, for, although the sperm- whale *(Catodon macrocephalus) *has a gullet sufficiently large to admit the body of a man, yet it can hardly be the fish intended; as the natural food of cetaceans consists of small animals, such as medussa and crustacea. Nor, again, can we agree with bishop Jebb *(Sacred Literature, *p. 178, 179) that the κοιλία of the Greek Test. denotes the back portion of a whale'sr mouth, in the cavity of which' the prophet was concealed; for the whole passage in Jonah is clearly opposed to such an interpretation. The only fish, then, capable of swallowing a man would be a large specimen of the white shark *(Carcharias vulgaris), *that dreaded enemy of sailors, and the most voracious of the family of *Squalide. *This shark, which sometimes attains the length of thirty feet, is quite able to swallow a man whole. Some commentators are skeptical on this point. It would, however, be easy to quote passages from the writings of authors and travelers in proof of this assertion; we confine ourselves to two or three extracts. The shark ' has a large gullet, and in the belly of it are sometimes found the bodies of men half eaten; sometimes *whole and entire *(Nature Displayed, 3, 140). But lest the abbé Pluche should not be considered sufficient authority, we give a quotation from Mr. Couch's recent publication, *A History of the Fishes of the British Islands. *Speaking of white sharks, this author, who has paid much attention to the habits of fish, states that 'they usually cut asunder any object of considerable size and thus swallow it; but if they find a difficulty in doing this, there is no hesitation in passing into the stomach even what is of enormous bulk; and the formation of the jaws and throat render this a matter of but little difficulty.' Ruysch says that the whole body of a man in armor *(loricatus) *has been found in the stomach of a white shark; and Captain King, in his *Survey of Australia, *says he had caught one which could have swallowed a man with the greatest ease. Blumenbach mentions that a whole horse has been found in a shark, and Captain Basil Hall reports the taking of one in which, besides other things, he found the whole skin of a buffalo which a short time before had been thrown overboard from his ship (1, 27). Dr. Baird, of the British Museum *(Cyclop. of Nat. Sciences, *p. 514), says that in the river Hooghly, below Calcutta, he had seen a white shark swallow a bullock's head and horns entire, and he speaks also of a 'shark's mouth being sufficiently wide to receive the body of a man.' Wherever, therefore the Tarshish, to which Jonah's ship was bound, was situated, whether in Spain or in Cilicia or in Ceylon, it is certain that the common white shark might have been seen on the voyage. The *C. vulgaris *is not uncommon in the Mediterranean; it occurs, as Forskal *(Descript. Animal. p. *20) assures us, in the Arabian Gulf, and is common also in the Indian Ocean. So far for the *natural *portion of the subject. But how Jonah could have been swallowed whole, *unhurt, *or how he could have existed for any time in the shark's belly, it is impossible to explain by simply natural causes. Certainly the preservation of Jonah in a fish's belly is not more remarkable than that of the three children in the midst of Nebuchadnezzar's 'burning fiery furnace.' Naturalists have recorded that sharks have the habit of throwing up again whole and alive the prey they have seized (see Couch's *Hist. of Fishes, *1, 33). 'I have heard,' says Mr. Darwin, ' from Dr. Allen of Forres, that he has frequently found a Diodon floating alive and distended in the stomach of a shark; and that on several occasions he has known it eat its way out, not only through the coats of the stomach, but through the sides of the monster, which has been thus killed."
WHALLEY, RICHARD CHAPPLE, DD Whalley, Richard Chapple, Dd

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Whalley, Richard Chapple, D.D. a Church of England divine, was born in 1749. He received a superior education; displayed a passionate love for the fine arts in his youth, traveled extensively in Italy; and finally returned home, given much to skepticism. He became converted however, soon after, and took orders. He traveled in Europe in 1786; and on returning, in 1787, was ordained to the ministerial office at Horsington, where he continued to reside and officiate for thirteen years. Through the school of affliction, in the loss of his wife and child, his religious knowledge and character were deepened and perfected. He died Nov. 17,1816. See *Christian Guardian, *1847, p. 1,49.
WHALLEY, THOMAS SEDGWICK, DD Whalley, Thomas Sedgwick, Dd

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Whalley, Thomas Sedgwick, D.D. a Church of England divine, was born in 1745. He was educated at St. John's College, Cambridge, graduating B.A. in 1767, and M.A. in 1774; was presented to the rectory of Hagworthingham, Lincolnshire, in 1772, and died at La Fleche, November 30, 1828. He published his *Edwy and Edilda, *a tale (1778, 8vo): — The *Fatal Kiss, *a poem, written in the last stage of an atrophy, by a beautiful young lady (1781, 4to): — *Verses* *addressed to Mrs. Siddons *(1782, 4to)*: *— *Mount Blanc, *a poem (1788, 4to): — *The Castle of Montval, *a tragedy (1781, 8vo): — *Poems and Translations *(8vo): — *Kennet and Finelia, *a legendary tale (1809, 8vo). See (Lond.) *Annual Register, *1828, page 267.
WHARTON, CHARLES H, DD Wharton, Charles H, Dd

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wharton, Charles H., D.D. a Protestant Episcopal clergyman, was born in Maryland, May 25, 1748.1. At the age of twelve he was sent to the English College of St. Omer's, where he was educated a Roman Catholic. Little is known from this till his ordination in 1772, except that he was a teacher of mathematics for sometime at Liege. In 1783 he returned to America; and in1785 was rector of Immanuel Church, Newcastle, Del. Subsequently he was connected with the Swedish Church at Wilmington. In 1798 he served St. Mary's, Burlington, where he continued for upwards of thirty-five years, with great usefulness; and in 1801 he became president of Columbia College, N.Y. He died July 23,1833. See. Sprague, *Annals of the Amer. Pulpit, *5, 335.
WHATCOAT, RICHARD Whatcoat, Richard

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Whatcoat, Richard a bishop of the Methodist Episcopal Church, was born in Quinton, Gloucestershire, England, Feb. 23, 1736. He enjoyed the influences of an early religious education; was converted Sept. 3, 1758; and was immediately placed in official positions: by the society at Wednesbury, where he resided. In 1769 he entered as a probationer into the itinerant connection of Wesleyan Methodist preachers, then under the superintendence of Mr. Wesley. He preached extensively through England, Ireland, and the principality of Wales; and was selected by Mr. Wesley to aid in, the organization of the Methodist Episcopal Church in America. He was ordained in September, 1784, by John Wesley, assisted by Dr. Coke and Mr. Creighton, as deacon and elder; and, accompanying Dr. Coke, landed in America Nov. 3,1784. From the organization of our Church at the Christmas Conference until his election to the office of a bishop, he discharged, with the exception of three years, the duties of presiding elder, "which, in those days especially, required labors and privations of no ordinary character, as both the districts and circuits were large, the people in general poor, and the calls for preaching numerous and often far apart." At the General Conference in May, 1800, such was the health of bishop Asbury that he thought of resigning; but the Conference, in order to relieve him, elected bishop Whatcoat, he having a majority of four votes over Jesse Lee. Boehm, in his *Reminiscences, *says, "I witnessed the excitement attending the different ballotings. The first, no election; the second, a tie; the third, Richard Whatcoat was elected." The same authority gives a momentary view of the ordination Sabbath. "Sunday, the 18th, was a great day in Baltimore among the Methodists. The ordination sermon was preached by Rev. Thomas Coke, LL.D., in Light Street Church. Crowds at an early hour thronged the temple. The doctor preached from Re 2; Re 8: 'And unto the angel of the church in Smyrna write, These things saith the first and the last, which was dead, and is alive,' etc. After the sermon, which was adapted to the occasion, Richard Whatcoat was ordained a bishop in the Church of God by the imposition of the hands of Dr. Coke and bishop Asoury, assisted by several elders. Never were holier hands laid upon a holier head. In those days we went 'out into the highways and hedges and compelled them to come in.' That afternoon Jesse Lee preached in the market-house, on Howard's Hill, from Joh 17:3: 'And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.' The Lord was there in a powerful manner; several were converted." From the time of his election as bishop until he was disabled by sickness and debility, he traveled regularly through his vast diocese, which extended over the entire continent, preaching almost every day to the people, visiting the annual conferences, sometimes in. company with his venerable colleague, bishop Asbury, and sometimes alone, discharging his responsible duties with marked satisfaction to all concerned. In 1806 he met the Baltimore Conference in company with bishop Asbury, and at the adjournment of Conference traveled through the eastern shore of Maryland towards Philadelphia. His last sermon was preached in Milford, Del., on April 8. — He had "finished his sixth episcopal tour through the work after his consecration," says Dr. Phoebus, his biographer, "or near that; and, after great suffering, he got an honorable discharge from the Captain of his salvation, and by his permission came in from his post which he had faithfully kept for fifty years." He took refuge at the home of senator Bassett, Dover, Del., where he died, "in the full assurance of faith," July 5,1806. He was buried under the altar of Wesley Chapel, in the outskirts of Dover. Bishop Asbury, some time after his death, visiting the place of his sepulture, preached his funeral sermon from 2Ti 3:10. In the course of his sermon he declared that such was his unabated charity, his ardent love to God and man, his patience and resignation amid the unavoidable ills of life, that he always exemplified the tempers and conduct of a most devoted servant of God and of an exemplary Christian minister. Bishop Whatcoat was not a man of deep erudition nor extensive science; but he was thoroughly acquainted with Wesleyan theology, and well versed in all the varying systems of divinity. As a preacher his discourses were plain, instructive, and highly spiritual. His distinguishing trait of character was a meekness and modesty of spirit which, united with a simplicity of intention and gravity of deportment, commended him to all as a pattern worthy of their imitation. Laban Clark said of him, "I think I may safely say, if I ever knew one who came up to St. James's description of a perfect main-one who bridled his tongue and kept 3 subjection his whole body-that man was bishop Whatcoat." See *Minutes of Annual Conferences, *1867, p. 145; Stevens, *Hist. of the M. E. Church, *2, 157, 166, 168, 182, 284, 295. 496; 3, 38, 75; 4:64,113,169, 184, 283, 501; Bangs, *Hist. of the M. E. Church, *2, 93,184,185; Boehm, *Reminiscences, *p. 35; Phoebus, *Memoirs of Bishop Whatcoat, *etc. (N. Y.1828), p.101. (J.L.S.)
WHATELY, RICHARD, DD Whately, Richard, Dd

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Whately, Richard, D.D. an eminent Anglican prelate and writer, was born in Cavendish Square, London, Feb. 1, 1787. His father was the Rev. J. Whately, D.D., prebendary of Bristol Cathedral, and proprietor of Nonsuch Park, Suffolk, whose brother, Thomas Whately, the private secretary to lord Suffolk, was the author of *Observations on Modern Gardening, *and *Remarks on Some of the Characters of Shakespeare. *His mother was a daughter of W. Plummer, Esq., of Ware Park, in Herefordshire. He was carefully educated, chiefly in private, at Nonsuch Park, and early entered Oriel College as a commoner, under the tutorship of Dr. E. Copleston, then head of the college, and afterwards bishop of Llandaff (1776-1849). From public lectures, private conversation, and personal study, Whately acquired a reputation as a sound thinker. His active, ingenious, and fertile mind found scope in the university studies; and in the stir of ecclesiastical politics, then sounding on their dim and perilous way towards Tractarianism, he kept a heedful and safe course. At the Michaelmas tern in 1808 he graduated as A.B., taking a second class *in literis humanioribus *and *in disciplinis mathematica et physicae, *when the late Sir R. Peel went up from Christ Church and came out in both the only first-classman of his year. In 1810 Whately gained the chancellor's (lord William Wyndham Grenville's) prize of £20 for the best English essay on *What are the arts in the cultivation of which the moderns have been less successful than the ancients? *In 1811 he was chosen, one of the eighteen fellows of Oriel College, graduated as A.M. in 1812, and then began to act as tutor in his college, in which office, by his felicitous style of teaching, he produced more first-class graduates than any other tutor of his day. In 1818 Whately contributed his article on *Logic *to the *Encyclopedia Metropolitana. *To the same work he also contributed the original outline of his *Elements of Rhetoric. *These writings were too important and useful to be kept shut up in the huge miscellany of learning in which they at first appeared, and were, on urgent demand, republished in 1825. The former, in which, as the late Prof. Spalding said, he has expounded the Aristotelian or syllogistic logic with admirable clearness and method, and illustrated it with characteristic sagacity, was severely commented upon by Sir G. C. Lewis, by George Bentham, nephew of the philosopher of Westminster, and notably by Sir W. Hamilton in his paper (subsequently republished) in the *Edinburgh Review *for April, 1833. Even by these opponents it is admitted that "a new life was suddenly communicated to the study" of logic by the publication of this work; and we may safely trust the decision of John S. Mill, that in it the student will find stated with philosophical precision, and explained with remarkable perspicuity, the whole of the common doctrine of the "syllogism." The latter work, that on *Rhetoric, *was immediately accepted as a text-book. De Quincey early acknowledged "the acuteness and originality which illuminate every part of the book," and asserted that "in any elementary work it has not been our fortune to witness a rarer combination of analytical acuteness with severity of judgment." In 1819 Whately issued anonymously his ingeniously grave logical satire, on skepticism, entitled *Historic Doubts Relative to the Existence of Napoleon Bonaparte. *In 1822 appeared his *Bampton Lectures, *on *The Use and Abuse of Party Feeling in Religion. *This subject is treated with delicacy, discrimination, and liberality, and the series has been frequently reissued. Meanwhile Whately became by marriage, in 1821, a member "not on the foundation" of Oriel. His wife was a daughter of Win. Pope, Esq., of Hillingdon, Middlesex, a lady of talent, taste, accomplishments and literary capacity. Shortly after his marriage he accepted the rectorship of Halesworth, with the vicarage of Chediston, deanery of Dunwich, in the Blything Hundred of Suffolk. In 1825 Whately succeeded Peter-Elmsley as principal of St. Alban's Hall. His *Logic and Rhetoric *were then republished as separate and independent works. In 1828 he published his *Essays on Some of the Difficulties in the Writings of the Apostle Paul, *which had been precede by a series on *Some of the Peculiarities of the Christian Religion, *and were succeeded by *The Errors of Romanism having their Origin in Human Nature, *etc. In 1830 his *Thoughts on the Sabbath *were issued by Mr. Fellowes, of Ludgate Hill himself a miscellaneous writer. This book was made the occasion of a prosecution for stamp-duty, to which all publications except books of piety and devotion were then liable. The publisher was fined £20, and, on remonstrance that the book was within the protection of the statute anent '"piety and devotion," he was answered that it was rather the contrary, because Mr. Whately controverts the Mosaic law, and inculcates that we may do just the same on Sabbaths as on other days." Several series of *Sermons, Charges, *and *Tracts *were published in 1830, 1833, and 1336. In 1831 earl Grey, then premier, promoted the logician, theologian, and politician- of St. Alban's Hall to the primacy of Ireland The appointment was at first the occasion of much animadversion. Suspicion was sown in the minds of the clergy, and dislike was shown in their conduct. But Whately's honest impartiality disarmed hostility, and he soon gained the hearts of clergy and people. Bishop Copleston said, Whately "accepted the arduous station proposed to him purely, I believe, from public spirit and a sense of duty. Wealth and honor and title and power have no charm for him. He has great energy and intrepidity; a hardihood which sustains him against obloquy when he knows he is discharging a duty; and he is generous and disinterested almost to a fault. His enlarged views, his sincerity, and his freedom from prejudice are more than a compensation for his want of conciliating manner." The labors of the episcopate, great as they were, could not exhaust his power of working. In 1828 he had composed a paper on *Transportation *in which he argued against convict colonies. He followed this up in 1832 with *Thoughts on Secondary Punishments, *and in 1834 with *Remarks on Transportation. *In these he had "the distinguished honor," says Henry Rogers, "of being the first who treated the subject comprehensively, or who succeeded in exciting any considerable degree of attention to it." In the parliamentary report on this topic in 1838 nearly all the opinions of archbishop Whately were adopted, and the carrying out of his principles was recommended. The question of the treatment of criminals did not use up all his sympathies. The cause of national education was advocated by him with force and pertinacity, and chiefly through his sagacity the national schools of Ireland, under the commissioners of education, were placed on a workable and useful foundation. For these schools (in particular) he composed several treatises; among others, his able little work, *Easy Lessons on Reasoning, *as well as those on *Money Matters; Morals; Mind; *and *British Constitution. *For scholastic purposes, too, he wrote for the Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge his candid *Lessons on the History of Religious Worship, *and his simple yet effective *Lessons on Christian Evidences — *the former of which has been translated into French and Italian, and the latter not only into these two tongues, but also into Spanish, Swedish. German, Greek, and Hebrew. *Explanations of the Bible and Prayer-book *"and *Lectures on Prayer *may also be regarded as additions to the educational *repertoire. *During the years 1833-41 the *Tracts for the Times *were issued, and for some years after Tractarianism was active and influential in the Church and in the university. The movement reached its crisis about 1843-45 in the withdrawal from the English communion of the author of *Tract *90 Dr. J. H. Newman and several others. Newman had been a friend of Whately's, and had "actually composed a considerable portion," and was "the original author of several pages," of Whately's famous work on *Logic *"as it now stands." Yet Whately did not shrink from duty at the call of friendship, but produced, as occasion, seemed to demand, his quiet, lucid, logical, and pithy *Cautions for the Times, *and with more special reference to the material doctrines and theories involved in the hurricane of controversy with which the Church was assailed, he issued in 1841 a truly admirable work, *The Kingdom of Christ Delineated. *In his *Charge *in 1843 he characterizes the prevailing opinions on subscription in a non-natural sense as "dangerous, disgraceful, and ruinous." Cognate topics occupy his charge for 1844, entitled *Thoughts on Church Government; for *1846, on *The Danger of Divisions within the Church; *for 1851, on *Protective Measures on Behalf of the Established Church. *The Maynooth question is reviewed in. *Reflections on a Grant to a Roman Catholic Seminary, *a charge delivered in 1845. On the failure of the potato crop in Ireland, he issued an *Address to the Clergy and Other Members of the Established Church on the Use and Abuse of the Present Occasion for the Exercise of Benevolence; *and the same topic occupied him in 1848, when he gave a charge on *The Right Use of National Afflictions. *The Tractarian doctrine of regeneration called from him in 1850 a charge on *Infant Baptism; *and every subsequent year found him holding himself abreast of the tide of speculative or practical difficulty, and able to teach his clergy to "buffet it aside with hearts of controversy." After the conference on Christian union, held at Liverpool in October, 1845, which resulted in the establishment of the Evangelical Alliance, Whately, early in 1846, issued *Thoughts on the Proposed Evangelical Alliance, *in which he expressed a fear that it would become an organized intolerance, or occasion a surrender of truth for the mere sake of an -outward unity; and "condemned as schismatical" the setting-up, by persons engaged in the ministry, of "extraneous combinations independently of their own Church authorities;" or the becoming members of those combinations when set up. He thus continued active in literature and public matters of importance until his death, which occurred at Dublin, Oct. 8, 1863. Whately's works not already noticed are chiefly the following: *Introductory Lessons on the Studies of St. Paul's Epistles (1849): — Scripture Revelations con2erning Good and Evil Angels (1851): — English Saynonlyms *(epd.): *— Bacon's Essays, with Annotations *(1856):*Lectures on Some of the Parables (1859): — Lectures on Prayer* *(1860): — Thoughts on the Proposed Revision of the Liturgy *(eod.): *— A General view of the Rise, Prioress, and Corruptions of Christianity *(cod.): — and in *Miscellaneous Lectures and Relics *(1861). Since his death two volumes of *Remains *have appeared. His *Life and Correspondence *(1866, 2 vols.) has been published by his daughter, Miss E. Jane Whately. See also *Memoirs *(1864), by William J. Fitzpatrick.
WHEAT Wheat

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wheat (חַטָּה, *chittidh *[for*, *חַנטָה, *chinth*]; Chald. plur. חַנטַין, *chintin; *σῖτος*), *the well-known valuable cereal cultivated from the earliest times, occurs in various passages of Scripture (Heb. Ge 30:14; Ex 9:32; Ex 29:2; Ex 34:22; De 8:8; De 32:14; Jg 6:11; Jg 15:1; Ruth 2, 23; 1Sa 6:13; 1Sa 12:17; 2Sa 4:6; 2Sa 17:28; 1Ki 4:11; 1Ch 21:20,23; 2Ch 2; 2Ch 10; 2Ch 15; 2Ch 27:5; Job 31:40; Ps 81:16; Ps 147:14; Song 7:2; Isa 28:25; Jer 12:13; Jer 41; Jer 8; Eze 4:9; Eze 27:17; Eze 45; Eze 13; Joe 1:11; Chald. Ezr 6:9; Ezr 7:22; Greek Matthew 3:12; 3, 25, 29, 30; Mr 4:28 ["corn"]; Luke 3, 17; 16:7; 22,31; Joh 12:24; Ac 7:12 ["corn"]; 27:38; 1Co 15:37; Re 6:6; Re 18:13; also Judith 3, 3; Ecclus. 39:26). In the A.V. the Heb. words *bar *(בִּר or בָּר, Jer 23:28; Joel 2, 24; Amos 5, 11; 8:5,6), *dagan *(דָּגָן*,* Nu 18:12; Jer 31:12), *riphoth *(רַיפוֹת, Pr 27:22), are occasionally translated "wheat;" but there is no doubt that the proper name of this cereal, as distinguished from "barley," "spelt," etc., is *chittah *(חַטָּה; Chald. חַנטַין, *chintin). *As to the former Hebrew terms, see under CORN. . There can be no doubt that *chittalh, *by some written *chittha, chefteth, cheteh, *etc., is correctly translated "wheat," from its close resemblance to the Arabic, as well to the names of wheat in other languages. Celsius says, חטה*, chittha, *occultato נ in puncto dagesch, pro חנטה, *chintha, *dicitur ex usu Ebreeorum." This brings it still nearer to the Arabic name of wheat, which in Roman characters is variously written, *hinteh, hinthe, henta, and *by Pemplius, in his translation of Avicenna, *hhintta; *and under this name it is described by the Arabic authors on Materia Medica. As the Arabic *ha *is in many words converted into *kha, *it is evident that the Hebrew and Arabic names of wheat are the same, especially as the Hebrew ה has the guttural sound. Different derivations have been given of the word *chittah *by Celsius it is derived from חָנִט, *chanaf, *protulit, produxit, fructuan*, *ex Song 2:13; or the Arabic "*chanat, *rubuit, quod triticum rubello sit colore"*(Hierobot. *2, 113). The translator of the *Biblical Botany *of Rosenmüller justly observes that "the similarity in sound between the Hebrew word *chittah *and the English *wheat *is obvious. Be it remembered that the *ch *here is identical in sound with theGaelic guttural, or the Spanish X. It is further remarkable that the Hebrew term is etynmologically cognate with the words for *wheat *used by every one of the Teutonic and Scandinavian nations (thus we have in Icelandic, *hveiti; *Danish, *hvede; *Swedish, *hvete;*Maeso-Goth. *hvaite; *German, *Weizen); *and that, in this instance, there is no resemblance between the Scandinavian and Teutonic terms, and the Greek, Latin, and Slavonic (for the Greek word is πυρός*; *the *Latin, frumentum *or *triticum; *the Russian, *psienitsa; Polish, psenica); *and yet the general resemblance between the Slavonic, the Thracian, and the Gothic languages is so strong that no philologist now doubts their identity of origin *(loc. cit. *p. 75). Rosenmüller further remarks that in Egypt and in Barbary *kamich *is the usual name for wheat (quoting *Descrip. de l'Egypte, *19:45; Host, *Account of Maroko and Fez, *p. 309); and also that in Hebrew, קֶמִח , *kemach, *denotes the flour of wheat (Ge 18:6; Nu 5:15). This, it is curious to observe, is not very unlike the Indian name of wheat, *kunuk. *All these names indicate communication between the nations of antiquity, as well as point to a common origin of wheat. Thus in his *Himalayan Botany, Dr. *J. F. Boyle has stated: "Wheat, having been one of the earliest- cultivated grains, is most probably of Asiatic origin, as no doubt Asia was the earliest-civilized as well as the first peopled country. It is known to the Arabs under the name of *hinteh; *to the Persians as *qguindum; *Hindfi, *gahnih *and *kunuk. *The species of barley cultivated in the plains of India, and known by the Hindau and Persian name *juo, *Arabic *shalir, *is *Iloumd hexaerstichum. *As both wheat and barley are cultivated in the plains of India in the winter months, where none of the species of these genera are indigenous, it is probable that both have been introduced into India from the north, that is, from the Persian, and perhaps from the Tartarian region, where these and other species of barley are most successfully and abundantly cultivated" (p. 419). Different species of wheat were no doubt cultivated by the ancients. as *Triticum compositum *in Egypt, *T. cestiuv. nu,* *T. hibernum *in Syria, etc.; but both barley and wheat are too well known to require further illustration in this place. Much has been written on the subject of the origin of wheat, and the question appears to be still undecided. It is said that *the Triticum vulgare *has been found wild in some parts of Persia and Siberia, apparently removed from the influence of cultivation *(English Cyclop. s.v. *"Triticum"). Again, from the experiments of M. Esprit Fabre of Agde, it would seem that the numerous varieties of cultivated wheat are merely improved transformations of *Egilops. ovata (Journal of the Royal Agricult. Soc. *No. 33, p. 167-180). M. Fabre's experiments, however, have not been deemed conclusive by some botanists (see an interesting paper by the late Prof. Henfrey in No. 41 of the *Journal *quoted above). Egypt in ancient times was celebrated for the growth of its wheat. The best quality, according to Pliny (*Nat. Hist. *18:7), was grown in the Thebaid; it was all bearded; and the same varieties, Wilkinson writes *(Anc. Egypt. *[ed. 1854], 2, 39), "existed in ancient as in modern times, among which maybe mentioned the seven-eared quality described in Pharaoh's dream" (Ge 41:22). This is the so-called mummy-wheat, which, it has been said, has germinated after the lapse of thousands of years; but it is now known that the whole thing was a fraud. Babylonia was also noted for the excellence of its wheat and other cereals. "In grain," says Herodotus (1, 193), "it will yield commonly two hundredfold, and at its greatest production as much as three-hundredfold. The blades of the wheat and barley plants are often four fingers broad." But this is a great exaggeration (see also Theophrastus, *Hist. Plant. *8:7). Modern writers, as Chesney and Rich, bear testimony to the great fertility of Mesopotamia. Syria and Palestine produced wheat of fine quality and in large quantities (Ps 147:14; Ps 81:16, etc.). There appear to be two or three kinds of wheat at present grown in Palestine the *Triticum vulgare (var.hibernum), *the *T. spelta, SEE RYE*, and another variety of bearded wheat which appears to be the same as the Egyptian kind, the *'Teomipoz' situm. *In the parable of the sower, our Lord alludes to grains of wheat which in good ground produce a hundredfold (Mt 13:8). "The return of a hundred for one," says Trench, "is not unheard of in the East, though always mentioned as something extraordinary." Laborde says, "There is to be found at Kerek a species of hundred wheat which justifies the text of the Bible against the charges of exaggeration of which it has been the object." The common *Triticum vulgare *will sometimes produce one hundred grains in the ear. Wheat is reaped towards the end of April, in. May, and in June, according to the differences of soil and position. It was sown either broadcast, and then ploughed in or trampled in by cattle (Isa 32:20), or in rows, if we rightly understand Isa 28:25, which seems to imply that the seeds were *planted *apart in order to insure larger and fuller ears. The wheat was put into the ground in the winter, and some time after the barley. In the Egyptian plague of hail, consequently, the barley suffered, but the wheat had not .appeared, and so escaped injury. Wheat was ground into flour. The finest qualities were expressed, by the term "fat of kidneys of wheat" (כַּליוֹת חַטָּה חֵלֶב , De 32:14). Unripe ears are sometimes cut off from the stalks, roasted in an oven, mashed and boiled, and eaten by the modern Egyptians (Sonnini, *Travels). *Rosenmüller *(Botany of the Bible, *p. 80), with good reason, conjectures that this dish, which the Arabs callferik, is the same as the *geres carnel (*כִּרמֶל גֶּרֶשׂ) of Le 2:14 and 2Ki 4:42. The Heb. word *kali *(קָלַי Le 2:14) denotes, it is probable, *roasted *ears of corn, still used as food in the East. An "ear of corn" was called *shibboleth *(שַׁבֹּלֶת), the word which betrayed the Ephraimites (Jg 12:1,6), who were unable to give the sound of *sh. *The curious expression in Pr 27:22, Though thou shouldst bray a fool in a mortar among wheat with a pestle, yet will not his foolishness depart from him," appears to point to the custom of mixing the grains of inferior cereals with wheat; the meaning will then be, "Let a fool be ever so much in the company of wise men, yet he will continue a fool." Maurer *(Comment. *loc. cit.) simply explains the passage thus: "Quomodocunque tractaveris stultum non patietur se emendari." *SEE CEREALS*. Wheat was known to the Israelites in Egypt (Ex 9:32), and on returning to Canaan they no doubt found 'it still cultivated as in the days of Reuben (Ge 30:14). Most probably they were the same sorts which were used in both countries; but there were only a few districts of Palestine, such as the plain of Jezreel, which could compete with that magnificent "carse," the delta of Egypt, the finest corn country of the ancient world. At present the wheat crops of Palestine "are very poor and light, and would disgust an English farmer. One may ride and walk through the standing corn without the slightest objection made or harm done. No wonder it is thin, when white crops are raised from the same soil year after year, and no sort of manure put into the ground"(Tristram, *Travels, *p. 591). *SEE AGRICULTURE*.
WHEATON, NATHANIEL SHELDON, DD Wheaton, Nathaniel Sheldon, Dd

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wheaton, Nathaniel Sheldon, D.D. a clergyman of the Protestant Episcopal Church, was born at Washington, Conn., Aug. 20, 1792. His preparatory education was acquired at' the Episcopal Academy of Cheshire, Conn., he graduated at Yale College in 1814; was ordained deacon and priest in 1817; was pastor in Anne Arundel, Prince George, and Montgomery counties, Md.; in 1818 became rector of Christ Church, Hartford, Conn., remaining twelve years; in 1831 became president of Trinity (then Washington) College, which office he filled until 1837; in that year became rector of Christ Church, New Orleans, continuing in that position for seven years; in 1844 visited Europe, and on his return published his travels in 1 two volumes. He was a scholar of varied learning. His benefactions to various scientific, philanthropic, and religious objects were large, and his bequests to Trinity College amounted to about twenty thousand dollars. He died at Marbledale, Conn., March 18, 1862. See *Amer. Quar. Church Review, *1862, p. 734.
WHEDON, DANIEL DENISON, DD, LLD Whedon, Daniel Denison, Dd, Lld

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Whedon, Daniel Denison, D.D., LL.D. an eminent Methodist Episcopal divine, was born at Onondaga, N.Y., March 20, 1808. He graduated from Hamilton College in 1828; studied law in Rochester for a year, and then became teacher in Cazenovia Seminary; in 1831 tutor in his *alnza mater; *in 1833 professor of languages in Wesleyan University, Connecticut; in 1834 joined the New York Conference; in 1842 was transferred to the Troy Conference, and stationed in 1843 at Pittsfield, Massachusetts; in 1845 became professor of rhetoric in the University of Michigan; in 1855 pastor at Jamaica, L.I.; in 1856 editor of the *Methodist Quarterly Review, *a position which he retained until 1884. He died at Atlantic Highlands, N.J., June 8, 185. Dr. Whedon was noted for his incisive, vigorous style, both as preacher and writer, and was remarkably powerful in controversy. He wrote very largely for the denominational press, and prominent among his works are a *Treatise on the Will *(New York, 1864), and a *Commentary on the New Test. *(1860-80, 5 volumes, 12mo). See *Alumni Record of Wesleyan University, *1882, page 29:656.
WHEDON, DANIEL DENISON, DD, LLD (2) Whedon, Daniel Denison, Dd, Lld (2)

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Whedon, Daniel Denison., D.D., LL.D. a Methodist Episcopal minister, was born at Onoidaga, N.Y., March 20, 1808. He graduated from Hamilton College in 1828, and then studied law; taught at Cazenovia, N.Y., 1830-31; was tutor at Hamilton, 1831-32; and 1833-43 professor of ancient languages and literature in Wesleyan University. In 1836 he was ordained; and became pastor in Pittsfield, Massachusetts, in 1843-45; in 1845-52 he was professor of logic, rhetoric, and history in the University of Michigan, where he served as president of the faculty in 1847-48; in 1855 was pastor at Jamaica, L.I.; in 1856-84, editor of the *Methodist Quarterly Review, *and general editor of the publications of the Book Concern. He died June 8, 1885. Besides many articles contributed to various periodicals, Dr. Whedon published, *Public Addresses, Collegiate and Popular *(1856): — *Commentary on Matthew and Mark *(1860): — *Freedom of the Will *(1864): — *Commentary on the* *New Testament *(5 volumes): — *On the Old Testament *(7 volumes). Two volumes of his collected papers appeared in 1886.
WHEEL Wheel

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wheel (usually and properly [of a carriage] (אוֹפִן, *ophán, *which is invariably so rendered; sometimes [of any circular object] גִּלגִּל*, galgál, *Ps 88:13; Ec 12:6; Isa 17:13; Jer 47:3; Eze 10:2,6,13; Eze 23:24; Eze 26:10; "heaven," Ps 77:18; Da 7:9; "rolling thing," Isa 17:13; or גּלגִּל, *galgál, *Isa 28:28; occasionally פִּעִם, *páam, *Judges 5, 28, a *step, *as often elsewhere; אָבנִיַם, *obnayim, *Jer 18:3, of a potter's wheel). We find that the wheels under the brazen laver in Solomon's Temple were cast; they are thus described by the sacred historian: "And the work of the wheels was like the work of a chariot-wheel; their axletrees, and their naves, and their felloes and their spokes were all molten"(1Ki 7:33). This is illustrated by the Egyptian chariots. A wheel has been found by Dr. Abbott of a curious construction, having a wooden tire to the felloe, and an inner circle, probably of metal, which passed through and connected its spokes a short distance from the nave (A, A). The diameter of the wheel was about three feet one inch. The felloe was in six pieces, the end of one overlapping the other. The tire was fastened to it by bands of rawhide passing through long, narrow holes (B, B) made to receive them (Wilkinson, *Anc. Egypt. *1, 382). Among the ancient Assyrians the wheels originally had six spokes, and the felloes consisted of four pieces. They appear to have been thicker and more solid than those of the Egyptians (Layard, *Nineveh, *2, 270). Later the wheel had eight and not six spokes, and was apparently strengthened by four pieces of metal, which bound the felloes *(ibid. *p. 271). *SEE CHARIOT*.
WHEEL (2) Wheel (2)

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wheel The vision of the wheels demands some remark (Eze 1:15-16,19-21): — "Now as I beheld the living creatures, behold one wheel upon the earth by the living creatures, with his four faces. The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the color of a beryl: and they four had one likeness: and their appearance and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel. And when the living creatures went, the wheels went by them: and when the living creatures were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted up. Whithersoever the spirit was to go, they went, thither was their spirit to go; and the wheels were lifted up over against them: for the spirit of the living creature was in the wheels. When those went, these went; and when those stood, these stood; and when those were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted up over against them: for the spirit of the living creature was in the wheels." This vision of Ezekiel has always been regarded both by Jews and Christians as very abstruse and difficult of interpretation, so much so, indeed, that the former anciently forbade it to be read by persons under thirty years of age. Bush observes, "From all that we can gather of the form of these wheels, they appear to have been spherical, or each composed of two of equal size, and inserted the rim of the one into that of the other at right angles, and so consisting of four equal parts or half-circles. They were accordingly adapted to run either forward or backward, to the right hand or to the left, without any lateral turning, and by this means their motion corresponded with that of the four faces of the living creatures to which they were attached. 'When they went upon their four sides, they turned not as they went,' Heb. 'When they went, they went upon the quarter-part of their fourfoldness,' i.e., upon or in the direction of one of the four vertical semicircles into which they were divided, and which looked towards the four points of the compass. When it is said 'they turned not,' it is not to be understood that they had not a revolving or rotary motion. but that they, like the faces, never forsook a straightforward course." A similar *cruciform *position of the wheels is adopted by most commentators. Of verses 19 and 20 the same author observes, "These circumstances are doubtless dwelt upon with peculiar emphasis in order to show the intimacy of relation and harmony of action subsisting between the living creatures and the wheels, or, more properly, between the things symbolically represented by them." Layard observes that the "wheel within wheel" mentioned in connection with the emblematical figures may refer to the winged circle or wheel representing at Nimrud the supreme deity *(Nineveh, *3:352). *SEE CHERUBIM*.
WHEEL OF BELLS Wheel of Bells

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wheel of Bells an instrument consisting of a broad wooden wheel to which from eight to twelve silver bells are affixed, rung by a rope at the elevation of the host in certain foreign churches, remarkable examples of which exist at Manresa and Gerona, Spain. The specimen at the former town, placed against the wall of the choir-aisle is contained in an ornamental eight-sided wooden case with Gothic sound-holes; that at the latter, hung against the north wall, is all of wood, its frame being corbelled out from the wall.
WHEELER (OR WHELER), SIR GEORGE, DD Wheeler (or Wheler), Sir George, Dd

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wheeler (Or Wheler), Sir George, D.D. an English clergyman and traveler, was born at Breda, Holland, of English parentage, in 1650. He removed to Kent, England, in childhood; was educated at Lincoln College, Oxford; traveled on the Continent and in the East with Dr. James Spon, of Lyons, in 1675-76; presented a collection of MSS. to the University of Oxford; received the honorary degree of A.M. from Oxford University; was knighted and ordained in 1683; and, having taken orders, was collated by bishop Crewe to the second prebend in the Cathedral of Durham in 1684. In 1685 he was presented to the vicarage of Basingstoke, Hants; in 1702 was created D.D. by diploma from Oxford, and in the following year received the curacy of Whitworth. In 1706 he was collated to the rectory of Winston, and in 1709 to that of Houghtonle- Spring, which he retained until his decease, Jan. 15, 1724. Dr. Wheeler was the author of, *A Journey to Greece *(1682): *— An Account of the Churches or Places of Assembly of the Primitive Christians *(1689): — and *The Protestant Monastery; or, Christiana AEconoamics *(1698). He was a man of vast research and ability, and a devoted minister and parent. See *Church of England Magazine, *8:332.
WHEELER, ALFRED, DD Wheeler, Alfred, Dd

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wheeler, Alfred, D.D. a Methodist Episcopal minister, was born in Huron County, Ohio, September 14, 1824. He was educated in the Ohio Wesleyan University, and in 1852 graduated from the Jefferson Medical College; but soon after joined the North Ohio Conference. In 1862 he entered the army as chaplain, part of the time serving as surgeon. From 1876 to 1884 he was editor of the *Pittsburg Christian Advocate. *He served his church as presiding elder of three districts, was a member of six General Conferences, of the OEcumenical Conference at London in 1884, and of the Centenary Conference at Baltimore in 1884. He died July 7, 1892. See *Minutes of the Annual Conferences *(Fall), 1892.
WHEELER, DANIEL Wheeler, Daniel

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wheeler, Daniel a distinguished member of the Society of Friends, was born in London, England, Nov. 27, 1771. Early in life he served in both the navy and the army. Having become a Christian, when not far from twenty-five years of age, he joined the Society of Friends. Some years after this, he abandoned a very lucrative part of the business in which he was engaged, that he might devote himself to the work to which, by the Spirit of God, he believed himself called. He became an accredited minister of the Society of Friends in 1816. In 1817 the emperor of Russia, in order to carry out a cherished plan for draining and cultivating the marshes surrounding St. Petersburg, secured the services of Mr. Wheeler as manager of the enterprise. While faithfully discharging his duties in the secular business to which he had been called, he was also faithful to his higher Master, and preached the Gospel with all simplicity and fidelity, not only to the humble and lowly, but also to the higher in authority in. Russia. He remained in St. Petersburg until 1832, when he felt impressed that it was his duty to go as a missionary among the islands of the Pacific, where a rich blessing attended his labors. After several years spent in missionary work in the Pacific, he returned to England Here he remained until 1838, when he came to the United States, where he continued nine months, rendering such service as he could to the cause of Christ, and then went back once more to his native land During a second voyage to the United States he contracted a disease which proved fatal; and he died soon after landing at New York, Feb. 6,1840. See *Memoir *(Phila. 1870). (J. C. S.)
WHEELER, JOHN, DD Wheeler, John, Dd

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wheeler, John, D.D., a Congregational minister, was born at Grafton, Vt., March 11,:1798. He graduated at Dartmouth College in 1816; and at Andover Theological Seminary in 1819. In 1821 he was ordained over the Church at Windsor, Vt., where he took high rank as a pulpit orator. At the age of twenty-six he declined the presidency of-the University of Vermont; but nine years after, upon the resignation of president Marsh, he accepted the honor. From this time his best energies were devoted to the university. He raised up friends for it, carried it through seasons of trial, and elevated the standard of scholarship. He resigned in 1848, and died at Burlington, April 16, 1862. Dr. Wheeler published several *Sermons *and *Discourses, *especially that before the Porter Rhetorical Society of Andover Theological Seminary in 1834. See *Cong. Quar. *1862, p. 307.
WHEELOCK, ALONZO, DD Wheelock, Alonzo, Dd

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wheelock, Alonzo, D.D. a Baptist minister, was born in 1801, in Vermont. Although the circumstances of his early life were of a somewhat depressing character, he secured for himself a good classical education, and had almost completed his studies preparatory to entering upon the practice of medicine, when he became a hopeful Christian. He now decided to fit himself for the ministry. He was a graduate of what is now the Theological Seminary of Madison (N.Y.) University, in the class of 1829. He had an honorable and successful ministry. His life as a minister was spent mostly with churches in the State of New York. For several years he had charge of a Church in the city of New York. He was recognized as an able scholar and an attractive preacher, and made hosts of friends wherever he lived. For two or three years before his death he was obliged to retire from the active duties of the ministry. His death occurred at Fredonia, in March, 1873. (J.C.S.)
WHEELOCK, ELEAZER, DD Wheelock, Eleazer, Dd

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wheelock, Eleazer, D.D. a Congregational minister, was born at Windham, Conn., in May, 1711, and graduated from Yale College in 1733. In March, 1735, he was ordained minister of the Second Church in Lebanon, called "Lebanon Crank," now Columbia. In the great Whitefieldian revival Mr. Wheelock engaged with great zeal and energy. After the religious excitement had subsided, he added to his labors as a minister the duties of a teacher. Samson Occum, a Mohegan Indian, who afterwards became a distinguished preacher, was a pupil in, his school in 1743. He soon formed the plan of an Indian Missionary School, and several Indian boys entered it, chiefly maintained by subscriptions from the legislatures of Connecticut and Massachusetts. The institution received the name of Moor's Indian Charity School, Joshua Moor having made a donation of a house and two acres of land about the year 1754. Mr. Occum and Rev. Nathaniel Whitaker solicited funds for the school in Great Britain in 1766, the amount realized being £7000 in England, and more than £2000 in Scotland. After conducting this school in Lebanon over fourteen ears, he determined to transfer it to New Hampshire, and a charter was obtained for a college, with about 40,000 acres of land, as an endowment from governor Wettworth and others. Thus originated at Hanover, N. H., Dartmouth College; but Moor's school was maintained there for along time as a separate institution. In August, 1770, Dr. Wheelock went to Hanover, built a log cabin in what was then a wilderness, and put up his school-building, eighty feet long and two stories in height.; Among the first graduates was his son John, who succeeded to the presidency of the college. As a teacher Dr. Wheelock was industrious and successful. He died April 24,1779. Dr. Wheelock published, *Narrative of the Indian Charity School at Lebanon (1762): — Narratives, *in several numbers, from 1763 to 1771: *— Continuation of the Narrative, to which is Added an Abstract of a Mission to the Delaware Indians West of the Ohio *(1773): — *A Sermon on Liberty of Conscience, or No King but Christ in the Church *(1775): — and an occasional *Sermon. *His *Memoirs, *by Drs. McClure and Parish, were published in 1811. See Sprague, *Annals of the Amer. Pulpit, *1, 397. Wheelock. John, D.D., LL.D., an American clergyman, was born at Lebanon, Conn., Jan. 28, 1754. He entered Yale College in 1767, but removed with his father Dr. Eleazer Wheelock, to Hanover, N. H., in 1770, and graduated at Dartmouth College in 1771; was tutor there from 1772 to 1776; was elected to the Colonial Assembly in 1775; appointed major in the New York forces in 1777, and soon after lieutenant-colonel in the Continental army; commanded an expedition against the Indians in 1778, and soon after was placed on general Gates's staff. At the death of his father in 1779, although only twenty-five years of age, he was chosen his successor as president of Dartmouth College; was sent to England to raise money and supplies for the college in 1783, but lost what he had collected by shipwreck off Cape Cod; was removed from his office in consequence of an ecclesiastical controversy in 1815, but restored in 1817, and died soon after, April 4, 1817. He left half of his large estate to Princeton Theological Seminary. He published a *Eulogy on Prof. John Smith, D.D. *(1809): — and *Sketches of Dartmouth College *(1816).
WHELAN, RICHARD VINCENT, DD Whelan, Richard Vincent, Dd

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Whelan, Richard Vincent, D.D. a Roman Catholic prelate, was born in Baltimore, Md., Jan. 29, 1809. He was educated at Mount St. Mary's College, Emmettsburg, where he became a teacher and prefect of studies; studied theology and philosophy at the Seminary of St. Sulpice, Paris, graduating in 1831; was ordained priest at Versailles the same year; was professor in St. Mary's College from 1832 to 1835; was a missionary in several parts of Virginia and Maryland from 1835 to 1840; became bishop of Richmond in March, 1850, and on the division of the diocese the following year took the title of bishop of Wheeling, where he was active in promoting the interests of Romanism, building up a seminary for young ladies, and a convent at Mount de Chautal; was a member of the Vatican Council of 1869-70, in which he opposed the dogma of infallibility, but gave in his adhesion to it after it was declared. He died at Wheeling, July 7,1874.
WHELER, GEORGE, DD Wheler, George, Dd

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Wheler, George, D.D. *SEE WHEELER, SIR GEORGE *.
WHELP Whelp

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Whelp (גּוֹר, *gor, *or גּוּר*, gir), *the *cub *of a lion (Ge 49; Ge 9; De 33:22; Jer 51,-38; Eze 19:2-3,5; Nahum 2, 13), or of a jackal (La 4:3). *SEE LION*. The cubs of a bear (2Sa 17:8; Pr 17:12; Ho 13:8) are not designated by the Heb. word. *SEE BEAR*.
WHEWELL, WILLIAM, DD Whewell, William, Dd

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Whewell, William, D.D. a clergyman and professor of the Church of England was born at Lancaster, England, in 1795. He graduated from Trinity College in 1816, and received the degree of D.D.; was ordained deacon in 1820, and priest in the following year; became master of Trinity College, Cambridge, in 1841, and was vice-chancellor of the university. Previous to this he was fellow and tutor of Trinity College, and from 1828 to 1832 was professor of mineralogy in the university; from 1838 to 1855 he was professor of moral theology. Dr. Whewell died at Cambridge, March 6, 1866. As an author he was prolific; among his works being, *An Elementary Treatise on Mechanics *(1819) which passed through seven editions: — *Analytical Statics *(1826): *Architectur al Notes on German Churches (1830): —* *Principles of University Education *(1831): *— First Principles of Mechanics *(1832): *— Doctrine of Limits *(eod.): *— Treatise of Dynamics *(1832-36),: *Astronomy and General Physics (1834): — Mechanical Euclid (1837): — History of the Inductive Sciences *(eod.. 3 vols.): *— Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences *(1840, 3 *vols.): — The Mechanics of Engineering (1841): — Liberal Education (1845): —Verse Translations from the German (1847): — Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy *(1852): *— Systematic Morality *(1846): — *Elements of Morality *(1848). He was also editor of an edition of Newton's *Principia, *first three sections (1846); of Butler's *Humans Nature *(1843) of Butler's *Moral Subjects *(1849); and of various other scientific works. He was also the author of various scientific articles in leading periodicals, and published many pamphlets and numerous sermons. See *Amer. Quar. Church Review, *July, 1866, p. 325.
WHICHCOTE, BENJAMIN, DD Whichcote, Benjamin, Dd

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Whichcote, Benjamin, D.D. an eminent English divine, was born at Whichcote Hall; in the parish of Stoke, in Shropshire, March 11, 1610. He was educated at Emmanuel College, Cambridge, where he graduated in 1629; became a fellow there in 1633; was a distinguished tutor; was ordained in 1636; organized a Sunday-afternoon lectureship at Trinity Church, and became preacher to the university; was presented to the living of North Cadbury, in Somersetshire, in 1643; appointed provost of King's College in 1644; — presented to the rectory of Milton, in Cambridgeshire, in 1649; was removed from his provostship at the Restoration in 1661, but retained his rectory at Milton; obtained the living of St. Anne's, Blackfriars, London, in 1662; and the vicarage of St. Lawrence's, Jewry, in 1668. He died while on a visit at Cambridge, in May, 1683. "Dr. Whichcote is regarded as one of the heads, if not the chief founder, of what is called the latitudinarian school of English divines." He enjoyed great fame as a preacher, and left considerable results of his literary labors, although he published nothing during his lifetime. His *Observations and Apothegms *(1688), and his *Sermons *(1698), were edited by the earl of Shaftesbury. Dr. John Jeffery edited his *Moral and Religious Aphorisms *(1703), and his *Discourses *(1701-3,3 vols.), to which Dr. Samuel Clarke added a fourth in 1707. An edition of his *Sermons, in *4 vols., accompanied by a *Life *by Drs. Campbell and Gerard, appeared in 1751.
WHIP Whip

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Whip (שׁוֹט, *shot; *occasionally rendered "scourge," Job 5:21; Job 9:23; Isa 10:26; Isa 28:15). In ancient times, whips were used not only for driving animals, but also as instruments of torture; and even now, in slaveholding countries, the unfortunate slaves are obliged to work with the, fear of the whip before their eyes. The system of administering personal chastisement has been, and is, universal throughout the East; and, under despotic governments, no person can be sure of escaping, as punishment is inflicted on the mere caprice of any tyrant who may happen to be in power. For this purpose, however, the rod (q.v.) was oftener used, and punishment of the *bastinado *(q.v.) is now the most common in Oriental countries. *SEE CORPORAL PUNISHMENT*. Various materials were used in the manufacture of whips. In 1Ki 12:11, Rehoboam says, "My father chastised you with whips, but I will chastise you with scorpions." Here a simple scourge and another more painful are mentioned in opposition. This latter is called, "a scorpion;" and probably means to denote a comparison between the pain respectively occasioned by the scourge and the reptile. The rabbins think generally that this scorpion was a scourge composed of knotted and thorny twigs, by which the flesh was severely lacerated. More probably it consisted of thongs set with thorns or sharp iron points. Such scourges were known to the Romans as a means of torturing used by unrelenting persons, and particularly by masters in the punishment of their slaves. Some of the early martyrs were thus tortured. *SEE SCOURGE*. Few travelers have visited Egypt without commiserating the condition of the unhappy Fellahs: every public work is executed by their unpaid labor; half naked and half starved, they toil under a burning sun, to clear out canals or level roads, under the eyes of taskmasters ready to punish with their formidable whips, made from the hide of the hippopotamus, the least neglect or relaxation. Such a sight necessarily calls to mind the sufferings endured by the Israelites while they were subjected to the tyranny of Pharaoh. "The Egyptians made the children of Israel to serve with rigor; and they made their lives bitter with hard bondage, in mortar, and in brick, and in all manner of service in the field; all their service wherein they made them serve was with rigor"(Ex 1:13-14). The monuments abound with similar scenes. *SEE BRICK*. "In driving the ancient Egyptians used a whip, like the heroes and charioteers of Homer; and this, or a short stick, was generally employed even for beasts of burden, and for oxen at the plough, in preference to the goad. The whip consisted of a smooth, round wooden handle, and a single or double thong; it sometimes had a lash of leather, or string, about two feet in length, either twisted or plaited; and a loop being attached to the lower end, the archer was enabled to use the bow, while it hung suspended from his wrist" (Wilkinson, *Anc. Egypt. *1, 372 sq.). *SEE CHARIOT*.
WHIPPING Whipping

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Whipping was a punishment employed in the ancient Church for the discipline of junior monks arid inferior clergy for insubordination. It was also applied to others in certain cases. Bingham *(Christ. Antiq. *book 7, chapter 3) quotes from Palladius as follows: "In the Church of Mount Nitria, there were three whips hanged upon three palm-trees — one for the offending monks, another for the correcting of thieves, and a third for the correcting of strangers, whom they entertained in a hospital adjoining." Again, in Bingham's *Antiquities *(book 16, chapter 3), we find these statements: "Cyprian, in the *Life of Caesarius Avelatensis, *says that bishop observed this method both with slaves and freemen; and that when they were to be scourged for their faults, they should suffer forty stripes save one, according as the law appointed. The Council of Agde orders the same punishment. not only for junior monks, but also for the inferior clergy. And the Council of Mascon particularly insists upon the number of forty stripes save one. . . . The Council of Epone speaks of stripes as the peculiar punishment of the minor clergy" for the same crimes that were punished with excommunication for a whole year in the superior clergy." *SEE SCOURGE*.
WHIPPLE, GEORGE, DD Whipple, George, Dd

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Whipple, George, D.D. a professor of the Congregational Church, was born in Albany, N. Y., June 4, 1805. For a time he was a student in the Oneida Institute; was one year (1833) in the Lane Theological Seminary; and graduated from the theological department of Oberlin College in 1836, in which year he was ordained as an evangelist. From 1836 to 1838 he was principal of the Olberlin preparatory department, and from 18S8 to 1847 was professor of mathematics in that institution. From 1846 until his death he was secretary of the American Missionary Association, his office being in New York City. He died in Brooklyn, N.Y., Oct. 6, 1876. See *Cong. Quar. *1877, p. 427.
WHIRLWIND Whirlwind

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Whirlwind (סוּפָה, *suphah, *Job 37:9; Pr 1:27; Pr 10:25; Isa 5:28; Isa 17:13; Isa 21:1; Isa 66:15; Jer 4:13; Ho 8:7; Am 1:14; Ne 1:3; elsewhere "storm," etc., denoting the sweeping force of the wind or hurricane*; *also סִעִר, *sdar *Jer 23:19; Jer 25:32; Jer 30:23; elsewhere "tempest," or [fem.] סעָרָה, 2Ki 2:1,11; Job 38:1,6; Isa 40:24; Isa 41:16; Jer 23:19; Jer 30:23; Eze 1:4; Zec 9:14; elsewhere "storm," etc., which denote rather the violent rain or *tempest, *although accompanied with wind, Ps 107:25; Eze 13:11,13). "The two Hebrew terms above noted convey the notion of a violent wind, but with a different radical import — the former, because such a wind *sweeps away *every object it encounters; the latter, because the objects so swept away are *tossed about *and destroyed. In addition to this, Gesenius gives a similar sense to *galydl, *in Ps 77:18 (A.V. heaven) and Eze 1:3 (A.V. 'wheel'). Generally, however, this last term expresses one of the effects of such a storm in rolling along chaff, stubble, or such light articles *(Thesaur. *page 288). It does not appear that any of the above terms express the specific notion of a *whirlwind*, i.e., a gale moving violently round on its own axis, and there is no warrant for thie use of the word in the A.V. of 2Ki 2:11. The most violent winds in Palestine come from the east; and the passage in Job 37:9, which in the A.V. reads 'Out of the south cometh the whirlwind,' should rather be rendered 'Out of his chamber,' etc. The whirlwind is frequently used as a metaphor for violent and sweeping destruction. Cyrus's invasion of Babylonia is compared to a southerly gale coming out of the wilderness of Arabia (Isa 21:1; comp. Knobel, ad loc*.*), the effects of which are most prejudicial in that country. Similar allusions occur in Ps 58:9; Pr 1:27; Pr 10:25; Isa 40:24; Da 11:40" (Smith). In a large proportion of the passages the terms in question are employed in a figurative sense with reference to the resistless and sweeping destruction that is sure to overtake the wicked, But this of course implies. that tempests of such a character were phenomena not unknown in some parts of Palestine. We have only to look into the accounts of travellers to see how much this is the case, especially in the South Country and the regions bordering on the Dead Sea. Prof. Robinson and party were exposed to a violent. sirocco in the desert, in their route from Akabah to Jerusalem, which continued until towards evening. "The wind had been all the morning N.E;, but at eleven o'clock it suddenly changed to the south, and came upon us with violence and intense heat, until it blew a perfect tempest. The atmosphere was filled with fine pirticles of sand, forming a bluish haze; the sun was scarcely visible, his disk exhibiting only a dun and sickly hue; and the of the wind came upon our faces as from a burning oven. Often we could not see ten rods around us, and our eyes, ears, mouths, and clothes were filled with sand. The thermometer at twelve o'clock stood at 88 Fahr., and had apparently been higher; and at two o'clock it had fallen to 76 , although the wind still continued. Our Arabs called it *shurkiyeh, *i.e., an east wind, although it blew fom the south. The *simnoon, *i.e., *burning *or *poisonous *wind, they said, differs from it only in its greater heat the haze, and sand, and discoloration of the air being alike in both. Should it overtake a traveller without water, it may, in certain circumstances, prove fatal to him. He needs water, not only to drink, but it is well to wash the skin. The simoon, they said, prevails only during the season when the khamusius blows in Egypt." Farther on he states, "The tempest had become a tornado. It was with the utmost difficulty that we could pitch our tent, or keep it upright after it was pitched. For a time the prospect was dreadful, and the storm in itself was probably as terrific as most of those which have given rise to the exaggerated accounts of travellers" *(Reseasrches, *1:287, 289). A similar tempest of hot wind, "the glow of the air being like the mouth of a furnace," and fully charged with dust and sand, overtook him in the Arabah, not very far from the Dead Sea, about the end of May *(ibid.* 2:504). Lieut. Lynch describes, under April 26, a tempest which assailed him on the Dead Sea. It was with difficulty the boat was rowed ashore. He and his companions were nearly stifled with the wind. They sought relief in a ravine, where they found pools sufficient to bathe in; but the relief was only momentary. The wind increased to a tempest; the sun became red and rayless; the thermometer rose to 104 ; and when "some endeavored to make a screen of one of the boat's awnings, the fierce' wind swept it over in an instant. It was more like a blast of a furnace than living air" *(Expedition, *page 314). Kitto remarks *(Pict. Bible, *note on Isa 37:36): "As we have ourselves only felt the mitigated effecth of this wind on the skirts of deserts and in the shelter of towns, we cannot from experience speak of the more disastrous effects which it exhibits in the open deserts; bust, judging from what we observed under the circumstances indicated, and from such in formation as we have collected, we have no doubt that the numerous accomplished travellers of the last century and the one before, as Chardin, Shaw, Niebuhr, Volney, Bruce, Ives, and others, are correct in their united testimomy, supported as it is by the consenting evidence of natives accustomed to traverse the deserts. It is necessary to mention this, because some more recent travellers, who, on account of the season or direction of their journeys, had no occasion to experience any other than the milder effects of this wind, have seemed to doubt the destructive power which has been attributed to it." The most complete account of the simoon and its effects is that given by Volney *(Travels, *1:4). That part which describes its effects in the towns tourists can confirm from their own experience, and the rest is amply corroborated by the testimony of other travellers. "Travellers have mentioned these winds under the name *of poisonous *winds, or, more correctly, *hot winds of the desert. *Such, in fact, is their quality; and their heat is sometimes so excessive that it is difficult to form an idea of their violence without having experienced it; but it may be compared to the heat of a large oven at the moment of drawing out the bread. When these winds begin to blow, the atmosphere assumes an alarming aspect. The sky, at other times so clear in this climate, becomes dark and heavy, and the sun loses its splendor and appears of a violet color. The air is not cloudy, but gray and thick, and is, in fact, filled with an extremely subtle dust that penetrates everywhere. This wind, always light and rapid, is not at first remarkably hot, but increases in heat in proportion as it continues. All animated bodies soon discover it by the change it produces in them. The lungs, which a too rarefied air no longer expand: are contracted and become painful. Respiration is short and difficult, the skin parched and dry, and the body consumed by an internal heat. In vain is recourse had to large draughts of water; nothing can restore perspiration. In vain is coolness sought for; all bodies in which it is usual to find it deceive the hand that touches them. Marble, iron, water — notwithstanding the sun no longer appears — are hot. The streets are deserted and the dead silence of night reigns everywhere. The inhabitants of towns and villages shut themselves up in their houses and those of the desert in their tents, or in pits they dig in the earth where they wait the termination of the destructive heat. It usually lasts three days; but if it exceeds that time, it becomes insupportable. Woe to the traveller whom this wind surprises remote from shelter! he must suffer all its dreadful consequences, which sometimes are mortal. The danger is most imminent when it blows ill squalls, for then the rapidity of the wind increases the heat to such a degree as to cause sudden death. This death is a real suffocation; the lungs, being empty, are convulsed, the circulation disordered, and the whole mass of blood driven by the heat towards the head and breast; whence that hemorrhage at the nose and mouth which happens after death. This wind is especially fatal to persons of a plethoric habit, and those in whom fatigue has destroyed the tone of the muscles and vessels. The corpse remains a long time warm, swells, turns blue, alnd is easily separated; all of which are signs of that putrid fermentation which takes place when the humors become stagnant. These accidents are to be avoided by stopping the nose and mouth with handkerchiefs. An efficacious method is also that practiced by the camels, who bury their noses in the sand, and keep them there till the squall is over. Another quality of this wind is its extreme aridity, which is such that water sprinkled upon the floor evaporates in a few minutes. By this extreme dryness it withers and strips all the plants; and, by inhaling too suddenly the emanations from animal bodies, crisps the skin, closes the pores, and causes that feverish heat which is the invariable effect of suppressed perspiration." The ninth plague with which the Lord afflicted the Egyptians was a thick darkness, which is generally identified with the tempest called khamsin, prevalent in Egypt in the months of April and May (Ex 10:293). When the khamsin blows, the sun is pale yellow, its light is obscured, and the darkness is sometimes so great that one seems to be in the blackest night, even in the middle of the day. Sonini says, "The atmosphere was heated, and at the same time obscured by clouds of dust. Men and animals breathed only vapor, and that was mingled with a fine and hot sand. Plants drooped, and all living nature languished. The air was dark on account of a thick mist of fine dust as red as flame." Hartmann says, "The inhabitants of the cities and villages shut themselves up in the lowest apartments of their houses and cellars; but the inhabitants of the desert go into their tents, or into the holes which they have dug in the ground. There they await, full of anxiety, the termination of this kind of tempest, which generally lasts three days." The hot wind of the desert, called by the Italians *sirocco, *and by the *Arabs shurkiyeh, *i.e., an *east wind, *resembles the khamsin of Egypt. The sand-storms occur in the most awful form in deserts, when the fine sand is thrown into hillocks, and these are swept by furious winds, the sand of which they are formed being tossed on high, and whirled rapidly and densely through the air, until the storm has finally subsided. Under this most awful visitation of the sand-storm, it sometimes happens that travellers and their cattle are overwhelmed and suffocated. And even the more common and less dangerous forms ot this phenomenon, which occur in regions less absolutely sandy, or where the sands are less extensive than in the great sandy deserts of Asia, are still very formidable and alarming. Mr. Buckingham has given a description of such a storm, of that kind which must have been familiar to the Israelites during their wanderings. It occurred in the desert of Suez, that is, on the western verge of that sandy desert which occupies a considerable portion of the country between Egypt and Palestine. The morning was delightful on our setting out, and promised us a fine day: but the light airs from the south soon increased to a gale, the sun became obscure, and as every hour brought us into a looser sand, it flew about us in such whirlwinds, with the sudden gusts that blew, that it was impossible to proceed. We halted, therefore, for an hour, and took shelter under the lee of our beasts, who were themselves so terrified as to need fastening by the knees, and uttered in their wailings but a melancholy symphony. . . . Fifty gales of wind at sea appeared to me more easy to be encountered than one among these sands. It is impossible to imagine desolation more complete. We could see neither sun, earth, nor sky; the plain at ten paces' distance was absolutely imperceptible. Our beasts, as well as ourselves, were so covered as to render breathing difficult; they hid their faces in the ground, and we could only uncover our own for amoment to behold this chaos of mid-day darkness, and wait patiently for its abatement." Dr. Thomson states *(Land and Book, *2:311), "We have two kinds of sirocco — one accompanied by vehement wind, which fills the air with dust and fine sand, I have often seen the whole heavens veiled in gloom with this sort of sand-cloud, through which the sun, shorn of his beams. looked like a globe of dull, smouldering fire." *SEE WIND*.
WHISTON, WILLIAM Whiston, William

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Whiston, William a learned English divine and mathematician, was born at Norton, in Leicestershire, Dec. 9, 1667, where his father was rector of the parish. He was educated at Tamworth School and Clare Hall, Cambridge, where he graduated in 1690; became a fellow of his college, took orders in the Church of England, and was appointed mathematical tutor in 1693; was chaplain to Dr. Moore, bishop of Norwich, from 1694 to 1698; vicar of Lowestoft, in Suffolk, from 1698 to 1701; became deputy to Sir Isaac Newton in the Lucasian professorship of mathematics in 1701, and succeeded him in that chair on his resignation in 1703; was nominated by bishop Moore catechetical lecturer at the Church of St. Clement. By this time he had gained eminence as a preacher, when he adopted Arianism, rejected infant baptism, and began to omit portions of the litany. The bishop of Ely requested him not to fulfill the duties of the Boyle lectureship, in which he was making his views public, but allowed the continuance of the salary. Whiston resigned the lectureship, and, after several hearings before the heads of the houses, was deprived of his lectureship and expelled from the university, Oct. 30, 1710. In consequence of certain theological publications of a controversial character, he was pronounced a. heretic by the convocation in 1711, and the prosecution was continued until 1715, when the proceedings were terminated by an "act of grace." After his expulsion from the university he removed to London, where he gave lectures on astronomy and other mathematical sciences, and continued an active theological writer. He became a Baptist and a Millenarian, and gathered a congregation to his own house, to which he preached what he called primitive Christianity. A subscription was made for him in 1721 amounting to £470, and he derived additional income from his lectures and publications. He died in London, Aug. 22, 1752. Among his numerous publications are, *A New Theory of the Earth (1696): — The Accomplishment of Scripture Prophecies *(1708): *—Paceleclioizes Physicomathematicae *(1710): *—Primitive Christianity Revived *(1711-12): *— A Brief History of the Revival of the Arian Heresy in England (17 11): — Athanasius Convicted of Forgery *(1712): *— Three Essays onnTrinitarianism *(1713): — *A Vindication of the Sibylline Oracles; to which are added the Genuine Oracles Thenselves *(1715): — Astro*nomical Lectures *(eod.): *— St. Clement's and St. Irenceus's Vindication of the Apostolical Constitutions *(1716): *— Sir Isaac Newton's Mathematical Philosophy Demonstrated (eod.): — Astronomical Principles of Religion, Natural and Revealed *(1717): *— A Letter to the Earl of Nottingham concerning the Eternity of the Son of God and of the Holy Spirit *(1719): *— The True Origin of the Sabellian and Athanasian Doctrines of the Trinity *(1720): — *An Essay towards Restoring the True Text of the Old and New Testaments (1722): — The Literal Accomplishment of Scripture Prophecies *(1724): — *A Collection of Authentic Records belonging to the Old and New Testaments, Translated into English (1727-28): — Historical Memoirs of the Life had Writings of Dr. Samuel Clarke *(1730): *— The Primitive Eucharist Revived *(1736): *— The Eternity of Hell Torments Considered *(1740): *The Primitive New Testament (1745): — The Sacred History of the Old and New Testaments (eod.): — Memoirs of His Own Life and Writings *(1749-50): — and a translation of the *Works of Josephus, *which has never been superseded except in part., See Chalmers, *Biog. Dict. *s.v.
WHISTONIAN CONTROVERSY Whistonian Controversy

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Whistonian Controversy *SEE WHISTON, WILLIAM*.
WHITAKER, NATHANIEL, DD Whitaker, Nathaniel, Dd

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Whitaker, Nathaniel, D.D. a Presbyterian minister, was born at Huntington, L. I., Feb. 22, 1722, and graduated at Princeton College in 1752. He was ordained and installed at Woodbridge, N. J., in 1755; was called to Chelsea, near Norwich, Conn., Feb. 25,1761; and selected by the Connecticut Board of Correspondents for Evangelizing the Indians, to go to Great Britain with the Rev. Sampson Occum, an Indian of the Mohegan tribe, to solicit funds for a mission school. Lady Huntingdon, Romaine, Venn, Wesley, and others showed them great favor, and a considerable sum was raised. After eighteen months' absence, they returned, having prepared — the way for founding Dartmouth College. While in England he published several sermons on *Reconciliation to God. *Difficulties arising in his congregation on the subject of Church government, he accepted a call to the Second Church in Salem, Mass., and was installed July 28, 1769. In 1773, in consequence of a disagreement among the people, Dr. Whitaker, with fourteen others, withdrew from the Church, formed a separate congregation, and united with the Boston Presbytery, which declared the new erection the Third Church. His friends erected a house of worship, but it was soon after burned. Not disheartened, they sought outside help, and in 1776 were enabled to complete a new church. At the breaking-out of the war he warmly espoused the cause of independence, and actually engaged in the manufacture of saltpeter. In a short time he furnished the authorities with two hundred and eighty pounds. On the occasion of the Boston massacre in 1771, he printed a sermon on *The Fatal Tragedy in King Street, *and on the proclamation of independence another, entitled *An Antidote to Toryism; *and at the end of the war still another, *On the Reward of Toryism. *He was dismissed by a council called for that purpose, Feb. 10, 1784, but soon after installed at Norridgewock. After vainly attempting to establish a presbytery in Maine, he went to Virginia, and died at Woodbridge, near Hampton, Jan. 1,1795, in poverty, notwithstanding: all he had done for the Church and country. (W. P. S.)
WHITAKER, THOMAS DUNHAM, LLD Whitaker, Thomas Dunham, Lld

한

아직 번역 본문이 없습니다.

영

Whitaker, Thomas Dunham, LL.D. a clergyman of the Church of England, was born at Rainham, in Norfolk, June 8,1759. He was educated at St. John's College, Cambridge; ordained deacon in 1785, and priest the following year; became perpetual curate of Holme, Lancashire, in 1797; vicar of Whalley in 1809.; held for some time the vicarage of Heysham; became vicar of Blackburn in 1818, and remained there until his death, which occurred Dec. 18, 1821. He published *A History of the Original Parish of Whalley and Honor of Clitheroe, in the Counties of Lancaster and York. *(1801): *History of the Deanery of Craven *(1805): — *De Motu per Britanniam Civico Annis *1745 et 1746 (1809): *— The Life and Original Correspondence of Sir George Radcliffe *(1810): — an edition of *The Vision of Piers Plowman *(eod.): — a new edition of Thoresby's *Ducatus Leodinensis; or, The Topography (of Leeds',(1816): — Loidis and Aimete; or, An Attempt to Illustrate the Districts Described in these Words by Bede *(1816): — besides single sermons and other works.
출처: public_domain