서론
Revelation 8 Introduction
英文原文
Analysis Of The Chapter
One seal of the mysterious roll Revelation 5:1 remains to be broken - six having already disclosed the contents of the volume relating to the future. It was natural that the opening of the seventh, and the last, should be attended with circumstances of special solemnity, as being all that remained in this volume to be unfolded, and as the events thus far had been evidently preparatory to some great catastrophe. It would have been natural to expect that, like the six former, this seal would have been opened at once, and would have disclosed all that was to happen at one view. But, instead of that, the opening of this seal is followed by a series of events, seven also in number, which succeed each other, represented by new symbols - the blowing of as many successive trumpets. These circumstances retard the course of the action, and fix the mind on a new order of events - events which could be appropriately grouped together, and which, for some reason, might be thus more appropriately represented than they could be in so many successive seals. What was the reason of this arrangement will be more readily seen on an examination of the particular events referred to in the successive trumpet-blasts. The points in the chapter are the following:
(1) The opening of the seventh seal, Revelation 8:1. This is attended, not with an immediate exhibition of the events which are to occur, as in the case of the former seals, but with a solemn silence in heaven for the space of half an hour. The reason of this silence, apparently, is found in the solemn nature of the events which are anticipated. At the opening of the sixth seal (Revelation 6:12 ff) the grand catastrophe of the world's history seemed about to occur. This had been suspended for a time, as if by the power of angels holding the winds and the storm Revelation 7, and now it was natural to expect that there would be a series of overwhelming calamities. In view of these apprehended terrors, the inhabitants of heaven are represented as standing in awful silence, as if anticipating and apprehending what was to occur. This circumstance adds much to the interest of the scene, and is a forcible illustration of the position which the mind naturally assumes in the anticipation of dreaded events. Silence - solemn and awful silence - is the natural state of the mind under such circumstances. In accordance with this expectation of what was to come, a series of new representations is introduced, adapted to prepare the mind for the fearful disclosures which are yet to be made.
(2) seven angels appear, on the opening of the seal, to whom are given seven trumpets, as if they were appointed to perform an important part in introducing the series of events which was to follow, Revelation 8:2.
(3) as a still further preparation, another angel is introduced, standing at the altar with a golden censer, Revelation 8:3-5. He is represented as engaged in a solemn act of worship, offering incense and the prayers of the saints before the throne. This unusual representation seems to be designed to denote that some extraordinary events were to occur, making it proper that incense should ascend, and prayer be offered to deprecate the wrath of God. After the offering of the incense, and the prayers, the angel takes the censer and casts it to the earth; and the effect is, that there are voices, and thunderings, and lightnings, and an earthquake. All these would seem to be symbolical of the fearful events which are to follow. The silence; the incense-offering; the prayers; the fearful agitations produced by the casting of the censer upon the earth, as if the prayer was not heard, and as if the offering of the incense did not avail to turn away the impending wrath - all are appropriate symbols to introduce the series of fearful calamities which were coming upon the world on the sounding of the trumpets.
(4) the first angel sounds, Revelation 8:7. Hail and fire follow, mingled with blood. The third part of the trees and of the green grass - that is, of the vegetable world - is consumed.
(5) the second angel sounds, Revelation 8:8-9. A great burning mountain is cast into the sea, and the third part of the sea becomes blood, and a third part of all that is in the sea - fishes and ships - is destroyed.
(6) the third angel sounds, Revelation 8:10-11. A great star, burning like a lamp, falls from heaven upon a third part of the rivers, and upon the fountains of waters, and the waters become bitter, and multitudes of people die from drinking the waters.
(7) the fourth angel sounds, Revelation 8:12. The calamity falls on the sources of light - the sun, the moon, and the stars - and the third part of the light is extinguished, and for the third part of the day there is no light, and for the third part of the night also there is no light.
(8) at this stage of things, after the sounding of the four trumpets, there is a pause, and an angel flies through the midst of heaven, thrice crying woe, by reason of the remaining trumpets which are to sound, Revelation 8:13. Here would seem to be some natural interval, or something which would separate the events which had occurred from those which were to follow. These four, from some cause, are grouped together, and are distinguished from those which are to follow - as if the latter pertained to a new class of events, though under the same general group introduced by the opening of the seventh seal. A few general remarks are naturally suggested by the analysis of the chapter, which may aid us in its exposition and application:
(a) These events, in their order, undoubtedly succeed those which are referred to under the opening of the first six seals. They are a continuation of the series which is to occur in the history of the world. It has been supposed by some that the events here symbolized are substantially the same as those already referred to under the first six seals, or that, at the opening of the sixth seal, there is a catastrophe; and, one series being there concluded, the writer, by a new set of symbols, goes back to the same point of time, and passes over the same period by a new and parallel set of symbols. But this is manifestly contrary to the whole design. At the first Revelation 5:1 a volume was exhibited, sealed with seven seals, the unrolling of which would manifestly develop successive events, and the whole of which would embrace all the events which were to be disclosed. When all these seven seals were broken, and the contents of that volume were disclosed, there might indeed be another set of symbols going over the same ground with another design; or giving a representation of future events in some other point of view; but clearly the series should not be broken until the whole seven seals are opened, nor should it be supposed that there is, in the opening of the same volume, an arresting of the course of events, in order to go back again to the same beginning.
The representation in this series of symbols is like drawing out a telescope. A telescope might be divided into seven parts, as well as into the usual number, and the drawing out of the seventh part, for example, might be regarded as a representation of the opening of the seventh seal. But the seventh part, instead of being one unbroken piece like the other six, might be so constructed as to be subdivided into seven minor parts, each representing a smaller portion of the seventh part. In such a case, the drawing out of the seventh division would succeed that of the others, and would be designed to represent a subsequent order of events.
(b) There was some reason, manifestly, why these seven last events, or the series represented by the seven trumpets, should be grouped together, as coming under the same general classification. They were sufficiently distinct to make it proper to represent them by different symbols, and yet they had so much of the same general character as to make it proper to group them together. If this had not been so it would have been proper to represent them by a succession of seals extending to thirteen in number, instead of representing six seals in succession, and then, under the seventh, a new series extending also to the number seven. In the fulfillment, it will be proper to look for some events which have some such natural connection and bearing that, for some reason, they can be classed together, and yet so distinct that, under the same general symbol of the seal, they can be represented under the particular symbol of the trumpets.
(c) For some reason there was a further distinction between the events represented by the first four trumpets and those which were to follow. There was some reason why they should be more particularly grouped together, and placed in close connection, and why there should be an interval Revelation 8:13 before the other trumpet should sound. In the fulfillment of this we should naturally look for such an order of events as would be designated by four successive symbols, and then for such a change, in some respects, as to make an interval proper, and a proclamation of woe, before the sounding of the other three, Revelation 8:13. Then it would be natural to look for such events as could properly be grouped under the three remaining symbols - the three succeeding trumpets.
(d) It is natural, as already intimated, to suppose that the entire group would extend, in some general manner at least, to the consummation of all things; or that there would be under the last one, a reference to the consummation of all things - the end of the world. The reason for this has already been given, that the apostle saw a volume Revelation 5:1, which contained a sealed account of the future, and it is natural to suppose that there would be a reference to the great leading events which were to occur in the history of the church and of the world. This natural anticipation is confirmed by the events disclosed under the sounding of the seventh trumpet (Revelation 11:15 ff): "And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ, and he shall reign forever and ever. And the four and twenty elders, which sat before God on their seats, fell upon their faces, and worshipped God, saying, We give thee thanks, O Lord God Almighty, which art, and wast, and art to come; because thou hast taken thy great power, and hast reigned," etc. At all events, this would lead us on to the final triumph of Christianity - to the introduction of the millennium of glory - to the period when the Son of God should reign on the earth. After that (Revelation 11:19 ff) a new series of visions commences, disclosing, through the same periods of history, a new view of the church to the time also of its final triumph: the church internally; the rise of Antichrist, and the effect of the rise of this formidable power. See the Analysis of the Book, part fifth.
1
Revelation 8:1
羔羊揭開第七印的時候——見 Revelation 5:1 的註釋。
天上寂靜約有二刻——異象的整個場景設在天上(Revelation 4:1-11),約翰按事情彷彿在那裏進行的樣式加以描述。這裏的意思是:這印揭開之時,沒有出現聲音、雷轟、風暴——照第六印的性質(Revelation 6:12 及以下),或許預期會有這些,而它們先前似乎只是暫時止住(Revelation 7)——反而是一片可畏的寂靜,彷彿全天堂都恭敬地等候事情的開展。這當然是象徵性的描寫,目的不是表示事件本身的中斷,而是表示如今將要啟示之事件那懾人心魄、可畏的性質。
約有二刻——他並未自稱精確標定時間。那是一段短時期——然而在那樣的境況中顯得長久的時期——約半小時。這裏所用的詞——ἡμιώριον hēmiōrion——未見於新約其他地方。它準確地譯作「半小時」;由於當時的一日從日出至日落分為十二分,所指的時間與我們的半小時相差無幾。因此,這自然指一段短暫的時期。然而在焦灼懸望的狀態中,時刻彷彿走得極慢;要體會這話確切的力量,我們當思想所描繪的場景——印一一揭開,啟示出極重大的事件,每揭一印,趣味愈增;那似乎正導向萬物完結的事件進程,在第六印揭開之後中止了;如今這系列的最後一印即將揭開,要啟示萬事完結之時世界的景況將如何。
約翰目睹這一切;在這種懸望的狀態中,半小時可能恍如一個時代。我們當然不可設想,天上的寂靜是因隨後將發生之事的性質而起——因為那些事尚未啟示。這寂靜是由於先前啟示的性質自然引起的預期,也由於這是系列的最後一印——那奧祕書卷的終結。在我看來,這是本節顯而易見的解釋;然而如《啟示錄》其他部分一樣,此處的意義也眾說紛紜。有人認為全書由三重平行的異象系列構成,旨在預表未來之事,每一系列都引至萬物的完結——印、號、碗各為七數——他們視此為第一系列恰當的結束,並認為第七印揭開之時,一個新的象徵性敘述隨即開始,在號的表象下、以新的角度重經同一歷程。
艾希霍恩(Eichorn)與羅森米勒(Rosenmuller)認為,使徒所引入的寂靜僅為戲劇效果,因此並無特別含義。格勞修斯(Grotius)把整個敘述應用於耶路撒冷的毀滅,認為天上的寂靜指 Revelation 7:1 所述眾風被攔阻——對那城的忿怒此時被暫時懸止。Stuart 教授也把它應用於耶路撒冷的毀滅,認為七號指將臨到教會逼迫者的一系列審判中的七個階段。Daubuz 先生視此處的寂靜為君士坦丁時代教會獲得自由的象徵;維特林加(Vitringa)把它解釋為獸與假先知傾覆之後隨之而來的千禧年平安;伍德豪斯(Woodhouse)博士與坎寧厄姆(Cunninghame)先生視之為前數印所指事件系列的終結、以及新一連串啟示的開端;埃利奧特(Elliott)先生視之為神眾僕人受印期間眾風的懸止;Lord 先生則視之為主後 311 年戴克里先與伽勒里烏斯的逼迫結束之後,至該年年末君士坦丁大帝藉以登上帝位的內戰開始之前,介乎其間的一段安息時期。
這些解釋大多何等武斷、何等不能令人滿意,解經者對這象徵的意義何等不一致,一眼即見。最簡單、最明顯的解釋多半是真的;那就是如上所述:它指天上的寂靜,表達揭開那要結束整個系列、了結教會與世界事務的最後一印時,心中所感的那種可畏的期待。在這樣的時刻,沒有比這種莊嚴敬畏的狀態更自然的了;沒有比這更能以懾人的方式引出那印的揭開;也沒有比「眾聖徒的祈禱同香一起不斷獻在天上」這一敘述,更能自然表達教會的焦慮,以及敬虔的人在這些印相繼揭開之時可能有的感受。
英文原文
And when he had opened the seventh seal - See the notes on Revelation 5:1.
There was silence in heaven - The whole scene of the vision is laid in heaven Revelation 4:1-11, and John represents things as they seem to be passing there. The meaning here is, that on the opening of this seal, instead of voices, thunderings, tempests, as perhaps was expected from the character of the sixth seal (Revelation 6:12 ff), and which seemed only to have been suspended for a time Revelation 7, there was an awful stillness, as if all heaven was reverently waiting for the development. Of course this is a symbolical representation, and is designed not to represent a pause in the events themselves, but only the impressive and fearful nature of the events which are now to be disclosed.
About the space of half an hour - He did not profess to designate the time exactly. It was a brief period - yet a period which in such circumstances would appear to be long - about half an hour. The word used here - ἡμιώριον hēmiōrion - does not occur elsewhere in the New Testament. It is correctly rendered "half an hour"; and, since the day was divided into twelve parts from the rising to the setting of the sun, the time designated would not vary much from half an hour with us. Of course, therefore, this denotes a brief period. In a state, however, of anxious suspense, the moments would seem to move slowly; and to see the exact force of this, we are to reflect on the scenes represented - the successive opening of seals disclosing most important events - increasing in interest as each new one was opened; the course of events which seemed to be leading to the consummation of all things, arrested after the opening of the sixth seal; and now the last in the series to be opened, disclosing what the affairs of the world would be at the consummation of all things.
John looks on this; and in this state of suspense the half hour may have seemed an age. We are not, of course, to suppose that the silence in heaven is produced by the character of the events which are now to follow - for they are as yet unknown. It is caused by what, from the nature of the previous disclosures, was naturally apprehended, and by the fact that this is the last of the series - the finishing of the mysterious volume. This seems to me to be the obvious interpretation of this passage, though there has been here, as in other parts of the Book of Revelation, a great variety of opinion as to the meaning. Those who suppose that the whole book consists of a triple series of visions designed to prefigure future events, parallel with each other, and each leading to the consummation of all things - the series embracing the seals, the trumpets, and the vials, each seven in number - regard this as the proper ending of the first of this series, and suppose that we have on the opening of the seventh seal the beginning of a new symbolical representation, going over the same ground, under the representations of the trumpets, in a new aspect or point of view.
Eichorn and Rosenmuller suppose that the silence introduced by the apostle is merely for effect, and that, therefore, it is without any special signification. Grotius applies the whole representation to the destruction of Jerusalem, and supposes that the silence in heaven refers to the restraining of the winds referred to in Revelation 7:1 - the wrath in respect to the city, which was now suspended for a short time. Prof. Stuart also refers it to the destruction of Jerusalem, and supposes that the seven trumpets refer to seven gradations in the series of judgments that were coming upon the persecutors of the church. Mr. Daubuz regards the silence here referred to as a symbol of the liberty granted to the church in the time of Constantine; Vitringa interprets it of the peace of the millennium which is to succeed the overthrow of the beast and the false prophet; Dr. Woodhouse and Mr. Cunninghame regard it as the termination of the series of events which thee former seals denote, and the commencement of a new train of revelations; Mr. Elliott, as the suspension of the winds during the sealing of the servants of God; Mr. Lord, as the period of repose which intervened between the close of the persecution by Diocletian and Galerius, in 311, and the commencement, near the close of that year, of the civil wars by which Constantine the Great was elevated to the imperial throne.
It will be seen at once how arbitrary and unsatisfactory most of those interpretations are, and how far from harmony expositors have been as to the meaning of this symbol. The most simple and obvious interpretation is likely to be the true one; and that is, as above suggested, that it refers to silence in heaven as expressive of the fearful anticipation felt on opening the last seal that was to close the series, and to wind up the affairs of the church and the world. Nothing would be more natural than such a state of solemn awe on such an occasion; nothing would introduce the opening of the seal in a more impressive manner; nothing would more naturally express the anxiety of the church, the probable feelings of the pious on the opening of these successive seals, than the representation that incense, accompanied with their prayers, was continually offered in heaven.
2
Revelation 8:2
我看見那站在神面前的七位天使——Stuart 教授認為,這些天使是指「臨在的天使」,即他理解為 Revelation 1:4 中「那在寶座前的七靈」所指的使者。然而,若上文對那段經文所提出的解釋——即那是指聖靈,著眼於他多重的工作與運行——是正確的,那麼我們就必須為這裡的說法另尋應用。應用它時惟一的難處來自冠詞的使用——「那七位天使」(τοὺς tous)——彷彿他們是已經提過的天使;又因為除非是在 Revelation 1:4「那在寶座前的七靈」一語中,先前並未提到「七位天使」,於是有人主張這裡必是指那個提及。但這解釋並非絕對必要。約翰使用這說法,或許因為這些天使先前已被提過;或許因為按語言的慣用,所指是誰將足以明白——正如我們今天可以說「美國內閣的七位成員」或「聯邦諸州的三十一位州長」,雖然他們並未先被特別提及;又或許他把他們視為當時才顯明在他眼前的,而隨後的情形——他們吹號的事奉——將使他的意思足夠明確。
一個人說他看見了一支軍隊,以及總司令、四位參謀軍官、五隊軍樂隊、六連工兵與坑道兵等,這完全符合冠詞的用法。因此,並不必須假設這些天使先前已被提及。誠然,「站在神面前的」這說法含有這樣的意思:他們當被視為常久站在那裡,或說那是他們恰當的位置——彷彿他們是特別受派擔任這崇高事奉的天使。比較路加福音 1:19:「我是站在神面前的加百列。」若這意思包含在這說法之內,那麼即使先前未曾提及他們,使用冠詞也就有充分的理由了。
有七枝號賜給他們——每位一枝。號是誰賜的,經文沒有說。可以設想是那坐在寶座上的所賜。號在當時如現在一樣,有多種用途:召集會眾;集合作戰的隊伍;在爭戰中鼓舞、激勵軍兵。在這裡,賜號是要宣告一連串在世上造成重大改變的重要事件,彷彿神召集並率領他的軍旅,去成就他的旨意。
英文原文
And I saw the seven angels which stood before God - Prof. Stuart supposes that by these angels are meant the "presence-angels" which he understands to be referred to, in Revelation 1:4, by the "seven spirits which are before the throne." If, however, the interpretation of that passage above proposed, that it refers to the Holy Spirit, with reference to his multiplied agency and operations, be correct, then we must seek for another application of the phrase here. The only difficulty in applying it arises from the use of the article - "the seven angels" - τοὺς tous as if they were angels already referred to; and as there has been no previous mention of "seven angels," unless it be in the phrase "the seven spirits which are before the throne," in Revelation 1:4, it is argued that this must have been such a reference. But this interpretation is not absolutely necessary. John might use this language either because the angels had been spoken of before; or because it would be sufficiently understood, from the common use of language, who would be referred to - as we now might speak of "the seven members of the cabinet of the United States," or "the thirty-one governors of the states of the Union," though they had not been particularly mentioned; or he might speak of them as just then disclosed to his view, and because his meaning would be sufficiently definite by the circumstances which were to follow - their agency in blowing the trumpets.
It would be entirely in accordance with the usage of the article for one to say that he saw an army, and the commander-in-chief, and the four staff-officers, and the five bands of music, and the six companies of sappers and miners, etc. It is not absolutely necessary, therefore, to suppose that these angels had been before referred to. There is, indeed, in the use of the phrase "which stood before God," the idea that they are to be regarded as permanently standing there, or that that is their proper place - as if they were angels who were particularly designated to this high service. Compare Luke 1:19; "I am Gabriel, that stand in the presence of God." If this idea is involved in the phrase, then there is a sufficient reason why the article is used, though they had not before been mentioned.
And to them were given seven trumpets - One to each. By whom the trumpets were given is not said. It may be supposed to have been done by Him who sat on the throne. Trumpets were used then, as now, for various purposes; to summon an assembly; to muster the hosts of battle; to inspirit and animate troops in conflict. Here they are given to announce a series of important events producing great changes in the world as if God summoned and led on his hosts to accomplish his designs.
3
Revelation 8:3
另有一位天使來——這位天使是誰,經上沒有提,我們也無從判定。當然,關於這個問題歷來眾說紛紜(見 Poole 的《 Synopsis 》)——有人認為指眾天使,有人認為指教會的職事,有人認為指君士坦丁,有人認為指米迦勒,還有許多人認為指主耶穌。我們所知道的只是:這樣顯現的是一位天使;而且假定天上眾天使中任何一位都可能被委派去履行這裏所描繪的事,並無不妥。這裏的用意,看來是要把聖徒的禱告表徵為在期盼即將臨到世上的一連串奇事中升到神面前;而以一位深切關懷教會、為聖徒效力天使的手獻上這些禱告來描繪,有其優美的貼切之處。
站在祭壇旁邊——這是在天上:那裏被描繪為一座有祭壇、並配有敬拜神常用器皿的殿。當他將要獻上聖徒的禱告時,祭壇是他站立之處,因為在舊的施行制度下,敬拜者正是站在那裏。參 Matthew 5:23-24 與 Luke 1:11 的註釋。在後者那裏,一位天使被描繪為「站在香壇的右邊」向撒迦利亞顯現。
拿著金香爐——即火盤,為敬拜時盛火燒香而製。其描述與圖解見 Hebrews 9:4 的註釋。我們有理由認為,古時敬拜中所獻的香本是要作聖徒禱告的象徵,因為按慣例,祭司燒香的時候,敬拜者正在禱告。見 Luke 1:10。
有許多香賜給他——見 Luke 1:9 的註釋。這裏賜給他大量的香,因為那是一個可能獻上許多禱告的場合。
要和眾聖徒的祈禱一同獻上——頁邊註作「加在其中」。希臘文是「使他把它與……一同獻上」——δώσῃ dōsē。意思很清楚:當聖徒的禱告升起時,他也要燒香,使香在同一時刻上升,作那些禱告的象徵。參 Revelation 5:8 的註釋。
眾聖徒的——即一切聖潔之人、一切神兒女的禱告。這裏的觀念似乎是:在那時刻,眾聖徒都要同心呼求神,求祂轉消祂的怒氣。由於即將發生的事是神全體子民共同關心的事,因此可以預期他們必同心合意地懇求。
在金壇上——即香壇。在會幕和聖殿裏,這壇都包著金。
就是寶座前——這裏被描繪為殿中的事奉,而香壇也恰當地安置在祂的座位或寶座之前,正如在會幕和聖殿中一樣。在聖殿裏,神被描繪為坐在至聖所的施恩座上,香壇則在至聖所之前的聖所中。聖殿的描述見 Matthew 21:12 的註釋。
英文原文
And another angel came - Who this angel was is not mentioned, nor have we any means of determining. Of course a great variety of opinion has been entertained on the subject (see Poole's Synopsis) - some referring it to angels in general; others to the ministry of the church; others to Constantine; others to Michael; and many others to the Lord Jesus. All that we know is, that it was an angel who thus appeared, and there is nothing inconsistent in the supposition that anyone of the angels in heaven may have been appointed to perform what is here represented. The design seems to be, to represent the prayers of the saints as ascending in the anticipation of the approaching series of wonders in the world - and there would be a beautiful propriety in representing them as offered by an angel, feeling deep interest in the church, and ministering in behalf of the saints.
And stood at the altar - In heaven - represented as a temple with an altar, and with the usual array of things employed in the worship of God. The altar was the appropriate place for him to stand when about to offer the prayers of the saints for that is the place where the worshipper stood under the ancient dispensation. Compare the Matthew 5:23-24 notes; Luke 1:11 note. In the latter place an angel is represented as appearing to Zacharias "on the right side of the altar of incense."
Having a golden censer - The firepan, made for the purpose of carrying fire, on which to burn incense in time of worship. See it described and illustrated in the notes on Hebrews 9:4. There seems reason to suppose that the incense that was offered in the ancient worship was designed to be emblematic of the prayers of saints, for it was the custom for worshippers to be engaged in prayer at the time the incense was offered by the priest. See Luke 1:10.
And there was given unto him much incense - See the notes on Luke 1:9. A large quantity was here given to him, because the occasion was one on which many prayers might be expected to be offered.
That he should offer it with the prayers - Margin, "add it to." Greek, "that he should give it with" - δώση dōsē. The idea is plain, that, when the prayers of the saints ascended, he would also burn the incense, that it might go up at the same moment, and be emblematic of them. Compare the notes on Revelation 5:8.
Of all saints - Of all who are holy; of all who are the children of God. The idea seems to be, that, at this time, all the saints would unite in calling on God, and in deprecating his wrath. As the events which were about to occur were a matter of common interest to the people of God, it was to be supposed that they would unite in common supplication.
Upon the golden altar - The altar of incense. This in the tabernacle and in the temple was overlaid with gold.
Which was before the throne - This is represented as a temple-service, and the altar of incense is, with propriety, placed before his seat or throne, as it was in the tabernacle and temple. In the temple, God is represented as occupying the mercy-seat in the holy of holies, and the altar of incense is in the holy place before that. See the description of the temple in the notes on Matthew 21:12.
4
Revelation 8:4
香的煙——即燒香所生的煙。約翰看見這情景,自然把它解釋為聖徒的祈禱。這樣解釋的整個象徵,其含義是:在所指的時候,教會對即將發生之事的憂慮,自然引出許多的禱告。這無須以任何明確的史實來印證,因為在這樣的大禍迫近之時,教會必懇切地投身於敬虔,這是無人能懷疑的。在危難之時,情形素來如此;而且永遠可以假定:當危險威脅時——無論是對整個教會,還是對個別基督徒——人都會投奔施恩寶座。
英文原文
And the smoke of the incense ... - The smoke caused by the burning incense. John, as he saw this, naturally interpreted it of the prayers of the saints. The meaning of the whole symbol, thus explained, is that, at the time referred to, the anxiety of the church in regard to the events which were about to occur would naturally lead to much prayer. It is not necessary to attempt to verify this by any distinct historical facts, for no one can doubt that, in a time of such impending calamities, the church would be earnestly engaged in devotion. Such has always been the case in times of danger; and it may always be assumed to be true, that when danger threatens, whether it be to the church at large or to an individual Christian, there will be a resort to the throne of grace.
5
Revelation 8:5
天使拿著香爐——Revelation 8:3。這是一個新的表號,為要對將來的事件提供一種新的表述。藉先前的表號已表明將有許多禱告獻上;藉這表號則要表明,儘管將有這樣的禱告獻上,大而可畏的災禍仍將臨到地上。這由把香爐丟在地上來象徵,彷彿禱告不再蒙垂聽,或彷彿如今禱告已屬徒然。
盛滿了壇上的火——與此相似的景象見於 Ezekiel 10:2;那裏穿細麻衣的人受命進到基路伯以下輪子中間,從基路伯之間取滿一捧火炭,撒在城上,作為那城毀滅的表號。這裏的火炭顯然是取自祭壇,即燔祭的壇。比較 Isaiah 6:1 的註釋。這些火炭上並未放上香,而是隨即丟在地上。因此,新的表象乃是取火炭四散撒開,作為即將隨之而來之毀滅的表號。
倒在地上——旁註作「倒在……上」。旁註無疑表達了本義。因此,這表號恰當地表明可怕的災禍將臨到地上。連聖徒的禱告也未能使它們轉離;如今,火炭四散的表號表明可怖的審判將臨到世界。
隨有雷轟、大聲——即種種聲響、轟鳴。見 Revelation 4:5 的註釋。這裏的次序與那裏不同,但兩處都提到了閃電、雷轟和大聲。
閃電、地震——Revelation 6:12。這是動盪的表號。不必像尋找字面的「大聲」、「閃電」、「雷轟」的應驗那樣,尋找地震的字面應驗。
英文原文
And the angel took the censer - Revelation 8:3. This is a new symbol, designed to furnish a new representation of future events. By the former it had been shown that there would be much prayer offered; by this it is designed to show that, notwithstanding the prayer that would be offered, great and fearful calamities would come upon the earth. This is symbolized by casting the censer upon the earth, as if the prayers were not heard any longer, or as if prayer were now in vain.
And filled it with fire of the altar - An image similar to this occurs in Ezekiel 10:2, where the man clothed in linen is commanded to go between the wheels under the cherub, and fill his hands with coals of fire from between the cherubims, and to scatter them over the city as a symbol of its destruction. Here the coals are taken, evidently, from the altar of sacrifice. Compare the notes on Isaiah 6:1. On these coals no incense was placed, but they were thrown at once to the earth. The new emblem, therefore, is the taking of coals, and scattering them abroad as a symbol of the destruction that was about to ensue.
And cast it into the earth - Margin, upon. The margin expresses undoubtedly the meaning. The symbol, therefore, properly denoted that fearful calamities were about to come upon the earth. Even the prayers of saints did not prevail to turn them away, and now the symbol of the scattered coals indicated that terrible judgments were about to come upon the world.
And there were voices - Sounds, noises. See the notes on Revelation 4:5. The order is not the same here as there, but lightnings, thunderings, and voices are mentioned in both.
And an earthquake - Revelation 6:12. This is a symbol of commotion. It is not necessary to look for a literal fulfillment of it, anymore than it is for literal "voices," "lightnings," or "thunderings."
6
Revelation 8:6
拿著七枝號的七位天使預備要吹——Revelation 8:7。顯然是依次而行,也許是按他們將要吹號的次序排列自己。如今,吹號的路已鋪好,號所要表明的可怕震動與變化也已就緒。最後一印開了;天肅立以待將要啟示的是什麼;眾聖徒滿懷掛慮,已獻上禱告;盛滿火炭的香爐已拋在地上,彷彿這些審判再不能因禱告而止住;眾天使預備吹號,表明將要發生的事。
英文原文
And the seven angels which had the seven trumpets prepared themselves to sound - Revelation 8:7. Evidently in succession, perhaps by arranging themselves in the order in which they were to sound. The way is now prepared for the sounding of the trumpets, and for the fearful commotions and changes which would be indicated by that. The last seal is opened; heaven stands in suspense to know what is to be disclosed; the saints, filled with solicitude, have offered their prayers; the censer of coals has been cast to the earth, as if these judgments could be no longer stayed by prayer; and the angels prepare to sound the trumpets indicative of what is to occur.
7
Revelation 8:7
第一位天使吹號——即順序上的第一位,指隨後將臨之一系列事件中的頭一件。
有雹子與火攙著血丟在地上——雹子通常是神報應的表記,因它常被用來成就神刑罰的旨意。如 Exodus 9:23:「耶和華就打了雷下雹,有火閃到地上;耶和華下雹在埃及地上。」又如 Psalm 105:32,論到降於埃及的災殃時說:「他給他們降下冰雹為雨,在他們的地上有火焰燃燒。」再如 Psalm 78:48:「又把他們的牲畜交給冰雹,把他們的羊群交給閃電。」早自約伯的時代,雹子就被理解為神不悅的表記、施行刑罰的工具:
「你曾進入雪庫, 或見過雹倉嗎? 這雹是我為降災的時候 和打仗爭戰的日子所預備的。」
英文原文
The first angel sounded - The first in order, and indicating the first in the series of events that were to follow.
And there followed hail - Hail is usually a symbol of the divine vengeance, as it has often been employed to accomplish the divine purposes of punishment. Thus, in Exodus 9:23, "And the Lord sent thunder and hail, and the fire ran along the ground; and the Lord rained hail upon the land of Egypt." So in Psalm 105:32, referring to the plagues upon Egypt, it is said, "He gave them hail for rain, and flaming fire in their land." So again, Psalm 78:48, "He gave up their cattle also to the hail, and their flocks to hot thunderbolts." As early as the time of Job hail was understood to be an emblem of the divine displeasure, and an instrument in inflicting punishment:
"Hast thou entered into the treasures of the snow,
Or hast thou seen the treasure of the hail?
Which I have reserved against the time of trouble,
Against the day of battle and war!"
8
Revelation 8:8
第二位天使吹號——比較 Revelation 8:2-7 的註釋。按照上文所提出的解釋,這是指促成羅馬帝國傾覆的四件大事中的第二件。與前一例一樣,在此也宜先探究這表記的字面意義,再問是否有與它對應的歷史事件。
彷彿一座大山——山是力量的自然表記,因此成為堅強大國的表徵;因為山本身不僅是堅固之地,古時更起著堡壘的作用,且是權勢的所在。因此,山恰當地象徵強盛的國度。「打碎這像的石頭變成一座大山,充滿天下」(Daniel 2:35)。比較 Zechariah 4:7;Jeremiah 51:25。於是,我們自然把表記的這一部分應用於某個堅強強大的國家——不一定是出自山嶽地帶的國家,而是在力量上如山一般的國家。
焚燒著——一座烈火中的山;即全山樹林著火,或者更可能指一座火山。這樣一座山突然從根基被掀起、拋入海中,恐怕再沒有比這更崇高的形像了。《失樂園》中最崇高的段落之一,是詩人描繪天上大戰中眾天使把群山舉起——從根基撕起——擲向仇敵的地方:
「從根基處搖撼翻騰, 他們拔起安坐的群山,連同其全部負載—— 岩石、水、樹木——抓住蓬茸的峰頂 舉起,捧在手中帶走」,等。
第六卷。
然而,詩人並沒有像約翰那樣,描繪一座火山被搬運、拋入海中。這裏所用的表記,表示某種如火的、迅猛的、毀滅性的力量。若用來指一個國家,那就是一個彷彿為征服之慾而焚燒的國家——其攻擊迅猛、兇猛、如火——並焚盡路上的一切。
扔在海中——這形像極其宏偉;這樣的事件若真發生,那景象必莊嚴得可畏。至於這事的應驗,或說它所要表徵的對象,不會有什麼實質的疑問。當然,這不是按字面理解的;自然的應用是某個在某些方面像這樣一座焚燒之山的國家或軍隊,其進軍的效驗,就如把這樣一座山拋入大洋。我們自然會期待動盪與騷亂,特別是與海、與某個海岸地帶相關的動盪。無疑,在應用這表記時,我們應在其應驗中找到某個位於海外的國家,或某個沿海的海權國家,或與商務有關的事。
海的三分之一變成血——變得像血;變得紅如血。這裏的比喻是:這樣一座焚燒的山拋入海中,其映照會使海水看似染紅;照樣,在表記所指的事物中,也會有與此相應的情形。倘若發生激烈的海戰,倘若在某場殊死的海上交鋒中海水被血染紅,這表記便應驗了。
英文原文
And the second angel sounded - Compare the notes on Revelation 8:2-7. This, according to the interpretation proposed above, refers to the second of the four great events which contributed to the downfall of the Roman empire. It will be proper in this case, as in the former, to inquire into the literal meaning of the symbol, and then whether there was any event that corresponded with it.
And as it were a great mountain - A mountain is a natural symbol of strength, and hence becomes a symbol of a strong and powerful kingdom; for mountains arc not only places of strength in themselves, but they anciently answered the purposes of fortified places, and were the seats of power. Hence, they are properly symbols of strong nations. "The stone that smote the image became a great mountain, and filled the whole earth," Daniel 2:35. Compare Zechariah 4:7; Jeremiah 51:25. We naturally, then, apply this part of the symbol to some strong and mighty nation - not a nation, necessarily, that issued from a mountainous region but a nation that in strength resembled a mountain.
Burning with fire - A mountain in a blaze; that is, with all its woods on fire, or, more probably, a volcanic mountain. There would perhaps be no more sublime image than such a mountain lifted suddenly from its base and thrown into the sea. One of the sublimest parts of the Paradise Lost is that where the poet represents the angels in the great battle in heaven as lifting the mountains - tearing them from their base - and hurling them on the foe:
"From their foundations heaving to and fro,
They plucked the seated hills, with all their load,
Rocks, waters, woods, and by the shaggy tops
Uplifting, bore them in their hands," etc.
Book vi.
The poet, however, has not, as John has, represented a volcano borne along and cast into the sea. The symbol employed here would denote some fiery, impetuous, destructive power. If used to denote a nation, it would be a nation that was, as it were, burning with the desire of conquest - impetuous, and fierce, and fiery in its assaults - and consuming all in its way.
Cast into the sea - The image is very sublime; the scene, should such an event occur, would be awfully grand. As to the fulfillment of this, or the thing that was intended to be represented by it, there cannot be any material doubt. It is not to be understood literally, of course; and the natural application is to some nation, or army, that has a resemblance in some respects to such a blazing mountain, and the effect of whose march would be like casting such a mountain into the ocean. We naturally look for agitation and commotion, and particularly in reference to the sea, or to some maritime coasts. It is undoubtedly required in the application of this, that we should find its fulfillment in some country lying beyond the sea, or in some seacoast or maritime country, or in reference to commerce.
And the third part of the sea became blood - Resembled blood; became as red as blood. The figure here is, that as such a blazing mountain cast into the sea would, by its reflection on the waters, seem to tinge them with red, so there would be something corresponding with this in what was referred to by the symbol. It would be fulfilled if there was a fierce maritime warfare, and if in some desperate naval engagement the sea should be tinged with blood.
9
Revelation 8:9
「海中活物的三分之一死了」——其效果如同海中一切的魚被剪除三分之一。當然,這不應按字面領會。它旨在描述一種臨到世界海洋部分的效應,彷彿海中所有之物滅亡了三分之一。自然的解釋是把它應用於某種與海有關的入侵或災禍——臨到眾海島、沿海地區或商業。若整段描述是指羅馬帝國,那麼這或許特別指某件對該帝國海域有影響的事。
「船隻也壞了三分之一」——這也屬於同一場大災禍,影響帝國的商業。船隻的毀壞,是以某種方式由火山被拋入海中造成的——或因船隻接觸那燃燒的物體而被燒燬,或因海水翻騰而沉沒。其要旨在於:這災禍的性質將導致海上船隻的毀滅——或是海軍艦隊,或是商船。如今要尋求這事的應用或應驗,就必須:
(a) 找出某件或某些對世界海洋或商業部分有特殊影響的事件;以及
(b) 某件或某些這樣的事件——假設它們就是所指之事——能恰當地以這裏所用的影像來象徵:
(1) 若第一號是指阿拉里克(Alaric)與哥特人的入侵,那麼這裏我們自然要找下一次撼動羅馬帝國、促成其傾覆的入侵行動。
(2) 下一次入侵是根塞里克(Genseric)率領汪達爾人之下的入侵(吉本,卷二,頁306以下)。這發生於主後428-468年。
(3) 一座燃燒的山從根基被撕裂、驟然沉入海洋的表號,恰能代表這個強大的民族離開其古老的居所、向帝國沿海地區推進、並在那裏施行蹂躪——如下文所述。
(4) 汪達爾人在根塞里克之下的行動,與這表號所表達的觀念相符。在闡明這一點時,我如同以往,主要得益於吉本先生:
(a) 他對汪達爾人的概括記述如下:他們(卷一,頁138)被認為原先與哥特人同屬一族,哥特人與汪達爾人構成一個住在波羅的海沿岸的大民族。他們與哥特人一同渡過波羅的海;遷往普魯士與烏克蘭;入侵羅馬各行省;從羅馬人手中接受貢金;征服博斯普魯斯周圍的國家;劫掠比提尼亞諸城;蹂躪希臘與伊利里古姆,末了在狄奧多西皇帝治下定居於色雷斯(吉本,卷一,頁136-166;卷二,頁110-150)。後來他們被匈人驅逐前行,經過法蘭西與西班牙進入非洲,征服迦太基領土,建立獨立政府,此後長期以劫掠侵擾鄰近的海島與地中海沿岸,毀壞羅馬人的船隻與商業,並以對海島與海洋的蹂躪在帝國的傾覆中卓著。這樣,他們輾轉遷移,直到其蹂躪的場景更明確地成為帝國的沿海地區;其破壞的效應很可比作一座燃燒的山離開古老的根基、被拋入海中。
(b) 從吉本先生關於他們在其首領根塞里克之下之蹂躪的記述,這點便顯而易見。「塞維利亞與卡塔赫納成了那些兇猛征服者的酬報,毋寧說是獵物」(他們擊敗羅馬人卡斯提努斯之後),「他們在卡塔赫納港中所找到的船隻,足以把他們運往馬略卡與梅諾卡諸島,西班牙的逃亡者在那裏如置身安全之所,把自己的家眷財富藏匿起來,終歸徒然。航海的經驗,或許還有非洲的遠景,鼓勵汪達爾人接受伯尼法斯(Boniface)伯爵的邀請」(在料想中與羅馬的難處上幫助他,並藉定居非洲與他結盟(吉本,卷二,頁305-306)):「戈德里克(汪達爾王)之死,只是成全並激勵了這大膽的事業。代替一位身心均無過人能力的君王,他們得到了他的私生兄弟、可畏的根塞里克——這名字在羅馬帝國的毀滅中,堪與阿拉里克與阿提拉之名並列。」「根塞里克的野心幾乎毫無界限、毫無顧忌;這位武人能靈巧地運用陰暗的權術,去招攬於他的成功有用的盟友,或在仇敵中散播仇恨與紛爭的種子。幾乎在啟程之際,他得悉蘇維匯王赫爾曼里克竟敢蹂躪他定意放棄的西班牙領土。根塞里克不能忍受這侮辱,追擊蘇維匯人倉促的退卻直抵梅里達;把那王和他的軍隊驅入阿納斯河中,然後從容回到海邊,登載他的軍隊。把汪達爾人運過今日直布羅陀海峽——一條寬僅十二哩的水道——的船隻,是由急切盼望他們離去的西班牙人、並那曾懇求他們可畏援助的非洲將領所供應的」(吉本,卷二,頁306)。根塞里克在成就其目的時,不久便佔據了非洲北岸,擊敗伯尼法斯的軍隊,而「迦太基、西爾塔與希波勒吉烏斯是僅有的似乎在那普遍洪流之上屹立的城市」(吉本,卷二,頁308)。「忽然之間,」吉本先生說(卷二,頁309),「自丹吉爾至的黎波里那七個富饒的行省,被汪達爾人的入侵所淹沒;其毀滅性的狂怒或許被民間的仇恨、宗教的熱忱與浮誇的言辭所誇大了。戰爭以其最美好的形態也含著對人類與公義的不斷侵犯;而蠻族的敵意更被那不斷擾動其和平家政的兇悍無法之靈所煽烈。汪達爾人在遇到抵抗之處很少留情;他們勇敢同胞的死,都以他們陣亡之城牆下的城邑的毀滅來償」,云云。
這次入侵的結果是全北非被征服;希波與迦太基的陷落;並根塞里克在非洲建立一個與羅馬長期作戰的政府(吉本,卷二,頁310-311)。我們面前的表號特指海上的或海軍的行動與蹂躪,吉本先生的以下摘錄將表明:若這表號確是指他,這些影像的運用何等恰當。「發現並征服(非洲)可能居於熱帶之下的黑色民族,不能吸引根塞里克合理的野心;但他舉目向海;他決意創建海軍力量,他大膽的決定以堅定而活躍的毅力付諸實行。阿特拉斯山的森林供應了取之不竭的木材;他的新臣民精於航海與造船之術;他激勵他大膽的汪達爾人採納一種能使一切沿海國家暴露於其兵鋒之下的戰爭方式;摩爾人與非洲人被劫掠的希望所誘;相隔六個世紀之後,從迦太基港駛出的艦隊再次爭奪地中海的霸權。汪達爾人的成功、西西里的征服、巴勒莫的劫掠、以及對盧卡尼亞沿岸的頻頻侵襲,驚醒了並警動了瓦倫提尼安的母親與狄奧多西的姊妹。聯盟結成了;為消滅共同的仇敵,代價高昂而終歸無效的軍備籌備起來了;那仇敵卻保留他的勇氣,以應付他的權術所不能防止或規避的危險。
宮廷的變故使西方帝國既無保衛者、又無合法的君主,驅散了根塞里克的憂懼,並刺激了他的貪婪。「他立即裝備一支為數眾多的汪達爾人與摩爾人艦隊,在臺伯河口下錨」,云云(吉本,卷二,頁352)。「變亂後的第三日(主後455年,馬克西姆斯死時),根塞里克大膽地從奧斯提亞港推進到那不設防之城的城門。從城門出來的不是羅馬青年的突擊,而是一位主教率領聖職人員所組成的一支手無寸鐵而可敬的行列。但羅馬城與其居民被交給汪達爾人與摩爾人的放縱,其盲目的情慾為迦太基所受的傷害復仇。劫掠持續了十四晝夜;一切公私財富、神聖與世俗珍寶中尚存的一切,都被殷勤地運上根塞里克的船隻」,云云。
關於這次劫掠的記述,見吉本,卷二,頁355-366。馬約里安(Majorian)皇帝(主後457年)力圖「恢復羅馬人的幸福」,但他遭遇了根塞里克的兵鋒——就其品格與處境而言,他是羅馬最可畏的仇敵。「一支汪達爾人與摩爾人的艦隊在利里斯河(即加里利亞諾河)口登陸;但帝國軍隊突襲了那滿載坎帕尼亞掠物、行列雜亂的蠻族;他們被屠戮追趕到船上;他們的首領、王的內兄,在陣亡者中被發現。這樣的機警或可宣告新朝的作風;但最嚴密的警戒與最眾多的兵力,也不足以保護意大利漫長的海岸免受海上戰爭的劫掠」(吉本,卷二,頁363)。「皇帝早已預見:若無海軍力量,便不能成就非洲的征服。第一次布匿戰爭中,共和國曾施展如此驚人的勤奮,以致斧頭在林中初次落下之後六十天內,一支一百六十艘槳帆船的艦隊便威風凜凜地停泊在海上。在遠為不利的處境下,馬約里安媲美了古羅馬人的精神與毅力。亞平寧的森林被砍伐;拉文納與米塞努姆的兵工廠與製造場被修復;意大利與高盧爭相為公務慷慨捐輸;一支三百艘大型槳帆船、連同適當比例運輸艦與小船的帝國海軍,聚集在西班牙卡塔赫納那安全而寬闊的港中」(吉本,卷二,頁363-364)。
這支大艦隊的命運,吉本先生描述如下:「根塞里克因若干有勢力臣民的背信——他們嫉羨或憂懼主人的成功——而免於臨頭不可避免的傾覆。在他們密報的引導下,他奇襲了卡塔赫納灣中不設防的艦隊;許多船隻被擊沉、被擄獲或被焚燒;三年的籌備毀於一日之間」(卷二,頁364)。汪達爾人在根塞里克之下進一步的海上行動與海上劫掠,吉本先生記述如下:「意大利王國——西方帝國逐漸縮成的名稱——在里西梅爾治下,受汪達爾海盜不斷劫掠之苦。每年春天,他們在迦太基港裝備一支可畏的海軍;根塞里克本人雖已年邁,仍親自統率最重要的遠征。他的計謀密不透風,直到揚帆之刻。當舵手問他應取何航向時——『把決定交給風吧,』那蠻族帶著敬虔的傲慢回答說;『風必把我們送到那有罪的沿岸,那裏的居民觸犯了神的公義』;但若根塞里克本人肯下更明確的命令,他便斷定最富足的人便是罪最大的。
汪達爾人屢屢造訪西班牙、利古里亞、托斯卡尼、坎帕尼亞、盧卡尼亞、布魯提烏姆、阿普利亞、卡拉布里亞、威尼托、達爾馬提亞、伊庇魯斯、希臘與西西里的沿岸;他們受誘去征服那位居地中海中央、位置優越的撒丁尼亞島;他們的兵鋒所至,從赫拉克勒斯之柱到尼羅河口,遍佈荒涼與恐怖。因為他們志在擄物多於榮耀,所以很少攻打設防的城邑,也很少在曠野與正規軍交鋒。但他們行動的迅疾,使他們幾乎能同時威嚇並攻擊吸引其欲望的最遠的目標;而且他們既總是登載足夠數目的馬匹,一登岸便能以一支輕騎兵席捲那喪膽的鄉野」(卷二,頁366)。這描述與我們面前這段經文的表號——「彷彿火燒著的大山扔在海中」;「船隻也壞了三分之一」——吻合到何種程度,須留給讀者判斷。
然而,人或可以至少貌似有理地問:若承認啟示錄作者的用意,是指根塞里克治下汪達爾人的行動為羅馬帝國傾覆重要而直接的成因之一,那麼他能否找到比這更有力的表號?實在說,如今還有甚麼表號比這更鮮明、更合宜呢?若今日有人要用表號把這事描繪為帝國傾覆的成因之一,他能輕易找到一個更有力的表號嗎?這事本身或許無關緊要,但有一點或可表明關於第二號的解釋並非牽強:我在參考吉本先生以尋求應用之前,早已完成了對表號語言的解釋。
英文原文
And the third part of the creatures which were in the sea, and had life, died - The effect was as if one-third of all the fish in the sea were cut off. Of course this is not to be taken literally. It is designed to describe an effect, pertaining to the maritime portion of the world, as if a third portion of all that was in the sea should perish. The natural interpretation would be to apply it to some invasion or calamity pertaining to the sea - to the islands, to the maritime regions, or to commerce. If the whole description pertains to the Roman empire, then this might be supposed to have particular reference to something that would have a bearing on the maritime parts of that empire.
And the third part of the ships were destroyed - This also pertains to the same general calamity, affecting the commerce of the empire. The destruction of the "ships" was produced, in some way, by casting the mountain into the sea - either by their being consumed by the contact with the burning mass, or by being sunk by the agitation of the waters. The essential idea is, that the calamity would be of such a nature as would produce the destruction of vessels at sea - either naval armaments, or ships of commerce. In looking now for the application or fulfillment of this, it is necessary:
(a) to find some event or events which would have a particular bearing on the maritime or commercial part of the world; and,
(b) some such event or events that, on the supposition that they were the things referred to, would be properly symbolized by the image here employed:
(1) If the first trumpet had reference to the invasion of Alaric and the Goths, then in this we naturally look for the next succeeding act of invasion which shook the Roman empire, and contributed to its fall.
(2) the next invasion was that under Genseric, at the head of the Vandals (Gibbon, ii. 306ff). This occurred 428-468 ad.
(3) The symbol of a blazing or burning mountain, torn from its foundation, and precipitated into the ocean, would well represent this mighty nation moved from its ancient seat, and borne along toward the maritime parts of the empire, and its desolations there - as will be shown in the following remarks.
(4) the acts of the Vandals, under Genseric, corresponded with the ideas expressed by the symbol. In illustrating this I shall be indebted, as heretofore, principally to Mr. Gibbon:
(a) His general account of the Vandals is this: they are supposed (i. 138) to have been originally the same people with the Goths, the Goths and Vandals constituting one great nation living on the shores of the Baltic. They passed in connection with them over the Baltic; emigrated to Prussia and the Ukraine; invaded the Roman provinces; received tribute from the Romans; subdued the countries about the Bosphorus; plundered the cities of Bithynia; ravaged Greece and Illyrium, and were at last settled in Thrace under the emperor Theodosius (Gibbon, i.-136-166; ii.-110-150). They were then driven forward by the Huns, and having passed through France and Spain into Africa, conquered the Carthaginian territory, established an independent government, and thence through a long period harassed the neighboring islands, and the coasts of the Mediterranean by their predatory incursions, destroying the ships and the commerce of the Romans, and were distinguished in the downfall of the empire by their ravages on the islands and the sea. Thus, they were moved along from place to place until the scene of their desolations became more distinctly the maritime parts of the empire; and the effect of their devastations might be well compared with a burning mountain moved from its ancient base, and then thrown into the sea.
(b) This will be apparent from the statements of Mr. Gibbon in regard to their ravages under their leader Genseric. "Seville and Carthagena became the reward, or rather the prey of the ferocious conquerors" (after they had defeated the Roman Castinus), "and the vessels which they found in the harbor of Carthagena might easily transport them to the isles of Majorca and Minorca, where the Spanish fugitives, as in a secure recess, had vainly concealed their families and fortunes. The experience of navigation, and perhaps the prospect of Africa, encouraged the Vandals to accept the invitation which they received from Count Boniface" (to aid him in his apprehended difficulties with Rome, and to enter into an alliance with him by settling permanently in Africa (Gibbon, ii. 305, 306)): "and the death of Goaderic" (the Vandal king) "served only to forward and animate the bold enterprise. In the room of a prince, not conspicuous for any superior powers of the mind or body, they acquired his bastard brother, the terrible Genseric - a name which, in the destruction of the Roman empire, has deserved an equal rank with the names of Alaric and Attila." "The ambition of Genseric was almost without bounds, and without scruples; and the warrior could dexterously employ the dark engines of policy to solicit the allies who might be useful to his success, or to scatter among his enemies the seeds of enmity and contention. Almost in the moment of his departure he was informed that Hermanric, king of the Suevi, had presumed to ravage the Spanish territories, which he was resolved to abandon. Impatient of the insult, Genseric pursued the hasty retreat of the Suevi as far as Merida; precipitated the king and his army into the river Anas, and calmly returned to the seashore to embark his troops. The vessels which transported the Vandals over the modern Straits of Gibraltar, a channel only twelve miles in breadth, were furnished by the Spaniards, who anxiously wished for their departure; and by the African general who had implored their formidable assistance" (Gibbon, ii. 306. Genseric, in the accomplishment of his purposes, soon took possession of the northern coast of Africa, defeating the armies of Boniface, and "Carthage, Cirta, and Hippo Regius were the only cities that appeared to rise above the general inundation" (Gibbon, ii. 308). "On a sudden," says Mr. Gibbon (ii. 309), "the seven fruitful provinces, from Tangier to Tripoli, were overwhelmed by the invasion of the Vandals; whose destructive rage has perhaps been exaggerated by popular animosity, religious zeal, and extravagant declamation. War in its fairest form implies a perpetual violation of humanity and justice; and the hostilities of barbarians are inflamed by the fierce and lawless spirit which perpetually disturbs their peaceful and domestic society. The Vandals, where they found resistance, seldom gave quarter; and the deaths of their valiant countrymen were expiated by the ruin of the cities under whose walls they had fallen," etc.
The result of the invasion was the conquest of all northern Africa; the reduction of Hippo and Carthage, and the establishment of a government under Genseric in Africa that waged a long war with Rome (Gibbon, ii. 310, 311). The symbol before us has particular reference to maritime or naval operations and desolations, and the following extracts from Mr. Gibbon will show with what propriety, if this symbol was designed to refer to him, these images were employed. "The discovery and conquest of the black nations (in Africa) that might dwell beneath the torrid zone could not tempt the rational ambition of Genseric; but he east his eyes toward the sea; he resolved to create a naval power, and his bold resolution was executed with steady and active perseverance. The woods of Mount Atlas afforded an inexhaustible supply of timber; his new subjects were skilled in the arts of navigation and ship-building; he animated his daring Vandals to embrace a mode of warfare which would render every maritime country accessible to their arms; the Moors and Africans were allured by the hope of plunder; and after an interval of six centuries the fleets that issued from the port of Carthage again claimed the empire of the Mediterranean. The success of the Vandals, the conquest of Sicily, the sack of Palermo, and the frequent descents on the coasts of Lucania, awakened and alarmed the mother of Valentinian and the sister of Theodosius. Alliances were formed; and armaments, expensive and ineffectual, were prepared for the destruction of the common enemy, who reserved his courage to encounter those dangers which his policy could not prevent or elude.
The revolutions of the palace, which left the Western empire without a defender and without a lawful prince, dispelled the apprehension and stimulated the avarice of Genseric. He immediately equipped a numerous fleet of Vandals and Moors, and cast anchor at the mouth of the Tiber," etc. (Gibbon, ii. 352). "On the third day after the tumult (455 a.d., on the death of Maximus) Genseric boldly advanced from the port of Ostia to the gates of the defenseless city. Instead of a sally of the Roman youth, there issued from the gates an unarmed and venerable procession of the bishop at the head of the clergy. But Rome and its inhabitants were delivered to the licentiousness of the Vandals and the Moors, whose blind passions revenged the injuries of Carthage. The pillage lasted fourteen days and nights; and all that yet remained of public or private wealth, of sacred or profane treasure, was diligently transported to the vessels of Genseric," etc.
See the account of this pillage in Gibbon, ii.-355-366. The emperor Majorian (457 a.d.) endeavored to "restore the happiness of the Romans," but he encountered the arms of Genseric, from his character and situation their most formidable enemy. A fleet of Vandals and Moors landed at the mouth of the Liris, or Garigliano; but the imperial troops surprised and attacked the disorderly barbarians, who were encumbered with the spoils of Campania; they were chased with slaughter to their ships; and their leader, the king's brother-in-law, was found in the number of the slain. Such vigilance might announce the character of the new reign; but the strictest vigilance, and the most numerous forces, were insufficient to protect the long-extended coast of Italy from the depredations of a naval war" (Gibbon, ii. 363). "The emperor had foreseen that it was impossible, without a maritime power, to achieve the conquest of Africa. In the first Punic war the republic had exerted such incredible diligence, that within sixty days after the first stroke of the axe had been given in the forest a fleet of one hundred and sixty galleys proudly rode at anchor in the sea. Under circumstances much less favorable Majorian equalled the spirit and perseverance of the ancient Romans. The woods of the Apennines were felled, the arsenals and manufactures of Ravenna and Misenium were restored, Italy and Gaul vied with each other in liberal contributions to the public service; and the imperial navy of 300 large galleys, with an adequate proportion of transports and smaller vessels, was collected in the secure and capacious harbor of Carthagena in Spain" (Gibbon, ii. 363, 364).
The fate of this large navy is thus described by Mr. Gibbon: "Genseric was saved from impending and inevitable ruin by the treachery of some powerful subjects; envious or apprehensive of their master's success. Guided by their secret intelligence, he surprised the unguarded fleet in the bay of Carthagena; many of the ships were sunk, or taken, or burnt; and the preparations of three years were destroyed in a single day," ii. 364. The further naval operations and maritime depredations of the Vandals under Genseric are thus stated by Mr. Gibbon: "The kingdom of Italy, a name to which the Western empire was gradually reduced, was afflicted, under the reign of Ricimer, by the incessant depredations of Vandal pirates. In the spring of each year they equipped a formidable navy in the port of Carthage; and Genseric himself, though in very advanced age, still commanded in person the most important expeditions. His designs were concealed with impenetrable secrecy until the moment that he hoisted sail. When he was asked by the pilot what course he should steer - 'Leave the determination to the winds,' replied the barbarian, with pious arrogance; 'they will transport us to the guilty coast whose inhabitants have provoked the divine justice;' but if Genseric himself deigned to issue more precise orders, he judged the most wealthy to be the most criminal.
The Vandals repeatedly visited the coasts of Spain, Liguria, Tuscany, Campania, Lucania, Bruttium, Apulia, Calabria, Venetia, Dalmatia, Epirus, Greece, and Sicily; they were tempted to subdue the island of Sardinia, so advantageously placed in the center of the Mediterranean; and their arms spread desolation, or terror, from the Columns of Hercules to the mouth of the Nile. As they were more ambitious of spoil than of glory, they seldom attacked any fortified cities, or engaged any regular troops in the open field. But the celerity of their motions enabled them, almost at the same time, to threaten and to attack the most distant objects which attracted their desires; and as they always embarked a sufficient number of horses, they had no sooner landed than they swept the dismayed country with a body of light cavalry," ii. 366. How far this description agrees with the symbol in the passage before us - "a great mountain burning with fire cast into the sea"; "the third part of the ships were destroyed" - must be left to the reader to judge.
It may be asked, however, with at least some show of reason, whether, if it be admitted that it was the design of the author of the Book of Revelation to refer to the movements of the Vandals under Genseric as one of the important and immediate causes of the ruin of the Roman empire, he could have found a more expressive symbol than this? Indeed, is there now any symbol that would be more striking and appropriate? If one should now undertake to represent this as one of the causes of the (downfall of the empire by a symbol, could he easily find one that would be more expressive? It is a matter that is in itself perhaps of no importance, but it may serve to show that the interpretation respecting the second trumpet was not forced, to remark that I had gone through with the interpretation of the language of the symbol before I looked into Mr. Gibbon with any reference to the application.
10
Revelation 8:10
「第三位天使吹號」——按上文所提出的解釋,這指示羅馬帝國傾覆過程中的某個重要事件。
「就有大星從天上落下來」——星是君王、掌權者、或以地位或才幹著稱之人的自然表徵。比較Revelation 2:28的註釋。見Numbers 24:17以及Isaiah 14:12的註釋。一顆星從天落下,是曾居高位者的自然表號,或其性格與行徑如流星劃過天空之人的表號。
「好像火把」——或作:如同火炬。這裡的語言恰可描述一道劃破長空的流星;這表號所指的事物,與這樣的流星有相似之處。這裡所指的並非陰沉慘淡的流星(青灰、蒼白、可怖),而是一顆明亮、熾烈、燃燒的星——象徵火熱的能力、行動與執行的迅疾、外觀的輝煌——正如一位天賦卓越、性情猛烈、服飾華美的首領一般。在一切語言中,星大概都曾是美德光輝照耀、並對人類發揮有益影響之君王的表徵。同樣,在一切語言中,劃過天空的流星大概也一直是某種輝煌天才的表徵——這天才帶來或威脅著荒涼與毀滅;是一位沿著輝煌卻具毀滅性的路徑橫掃世界的戰士;被視為奉差遣執行上天報應的人。之所以有這種用法,是因為流星極其明亮,出現極其突然,其軌跡無任何已知定律可以測定,並且在人們的觀感中,它或被視為神不悅的記號,或易於引起驚恐與慌亂。因此,在應用這部分表號時,我們自然要尋找某位才華橫溢的君王或戰士:他突然出現,迅速橫掃世界;他引起驚恐與慌亂;他的路徑以荒涼為標誌;他被視為奉天差遣執行神的旨意——他來不是要以運用得宜的輝煌才幹造福世界,而是要向人類執行報應。
「落在江河的三分之一和眾水的泉源上」——關於「三分之一」這短語,見Revelation 8:7的註釋。這裡提到「江河」與「眾水的泉源」,部分似乎是為要說明:這一系列的審判將影響一切事物。在前面的異象中,已提到樹木與青草、海與船隻。江河與眾水的泉源並不比樹木、青草、世界的商業次要,因此這審判被描述為特別臨到它們。同時,與其他號一樣,我們有理由假定:在這表號所指的事件中,必有某種因素使這表號在此場合比在其他場合更為貼切。因此,我們自然要尋找某種特別影響江河縱橫之地、或江河發源之地的荒涼景象;或者,若這話被理解為更具隱喻的意義,則可視之為影響那些與江河泉源相似的事物——影響力的源頭、一個民族的道德與宗教、一個國家的制度;這些常被恰當地比作湧流的泉源或奔流的溪河。
英文原文
And the third angel sounded - Indicating, according to the interpretation above proposed, some important event in the downfall of the Roman empire.
And there fell a great star from heaven - A star is a natural emblem of a prince, of a ruler, of one distinguished by rank or by talent. Compare the notes on Revelation 2:28. See Numbers 24:17, and the notes on Isaiah 14:12. A star falling from heaven would be a natural symbol of one who had left a higher station, or of one whose character and course would be like a meteor shooting through the sky.
Burning as it were a lamp - Or, as a torch. The language here is such as would describe a meteor blazing through the air; and the reference in the symbol is to something that would have a resemblance to such a meteor. It is not a lurid meteor (livid, pale, ghastly) that is here referred to, but a bright, intense, blazing star - emblem of fiery energy; of rapidity of movement and execution; of splendor of appearance - such as a chieftain of high endowments, of impetuousness of character, and of richness of apparel, would be. In all languages, probably, a star has been an emblem of a prince whose virtues have shone brightly, and who has exerted a beneficial influence on mankind. In all languages also, probably, a meteor flaming through the sky has been an emblem of some splendid genius causing or threatening desolation and ruin; of a warrior who has moved along in a brilliant but destructive path over the world; and who has been regarded as sent to execute the vengeance of heaven. This usage occurs because a meteor is so bright; because it appears so suddenly; because its course cannot be determined by any known laws; and because, in the apprehensions of people, it is either sent as a proof of the divine displeasure, or is adapted to excite consternation and alarm. In the application of this part of the symbol, therefore, we naturally look for some prince or warrior of brilliant talents, who appears suddenly and sweeps rapidly over the world; who excites consternation and alarm; whose path is marked by desolation, and who is regarded as sent from heaven to execute the divine purposes - who comes not to bless the world by brilliant talents well directed, but to execute vengeance on mankind.
And it fell upon the third part of the rivers, and upon the fountains of waters - On the phrase, "the third part," see the notes on Revelation 8:7. This reference to the "rivers" and to the "fountains of waters" seems, in part, to be for the purpose of saying that everything would be affected by this series of judgments. In the previous visions the trees and the green grass, the sea and the ships, had been referred to. The rivers and the fountains of waters are not less important than the trees, the grass, and the commerce of the world, and hence this judgment is mentioned as particularly bearing on them. At the same time, as in the case of the other trumpets, there is a propriety in supposing that there would be something in the event referred to by the symbol which would make it more appropriate to use this symbol in this case than in the others. It is natural, therefore, to look for some desolations that would particularly affect the portions of the world where rivers abound, or where they take their rise; or, if it be understood as having a more metaphorical sense, to regard it as affecting those things which resemble rivers and fountains - the sources of influence; the morals, the religion of a people, the institutions of a country, which are often so appropriately compared with running fountains or flowing streams.
11
Revelation 8:11
「這星名叫茵蔯」——這名稱取得恰當。作者並不是說它實際上會被如此稱呼,而是說這名稱恰當地描述了它的性質。這類表達在寓意文學中十分常見。這個希臘文詞——ἄψινθος apsinthos——意為「茵蔯」,是一種眾所周知的苦草。這個詞便成為苦楚的恰當表徵。可比較 Jeremiah 9:15;Jeremiah 23:15;Lamentations 3:15、Lamentations 3:19。
「眾水的三分之一變為茵蔯」——變得苦如茵蔯。這無疑是一個表徵,預示眾水若真被如此變苦將導致的災禍。這樣一來,眾水自然對其最常見的用途變得毫無用處,而生命的毀滅也將不可避免。要設想這樣一場災禍的規模,只需想像一個國家的水井、江河與泉源有大半變得苦如茵蔯。可比較 Exodus 15:23-24。
「因水變苦,就死了許多人」——若一地為數可觀的泉源與溪流因茵蔯的浸漬而改變,這種後果自然會隨之而來。不必以為這是按字面為真;因為正如使用表號時,不應假定一部分的水真的會因一顆隕落流星的災殃影響變成茵蔯,同樣也不必設想這裏所要表達的,是藉著水對人類生命造成的字面毀滅。這裏無疑是要指出巨大的毀滅與荒廢——即若一地大半的水因苦澀而不宜飲用,其自然後果所恰切代表的那種毀滅。
因此,在解釋和應用這段經文時,我們可以採納以下的原則與規則:
(a) 在本註釋中可以假定,前兩個號聲之下的表號,分別指向阿拉里克與其哥特人、以及蓋薩里克與其汪達爾人。
(b) 帝國傾覆過程中下一個重大而決定性的事件,就是此處所指的那一件。
(c) 將有一位首領或戰士,可以比作一顆燃燒的流星;其行程將格外輝煌;他會如一顆燃亮的星驟然出現,隨後又如一顆星光被水吞滅的星消失無蹤。
(d) 那流星造成荒涼的行程,將主要落在水源泉流豐沛的那些地區。
(e) 所產生的後果,將如同那些溪流與泉源真的變苦了一樣;即許多人將喪命,那些江河溪流一帶將出現廣泛的荒涼,彷彿一顆苦毒有害的星墜入水中,死亡蔓延至沿岸及其所滋潤之地。
如今的問題是:是否確曾發生以這為恰當表徵的事件。在註釋者當中,已有相當一致的看法,認為這裏所指的乃是匈人之王阿提拉;倘若前文的註釋正確,這一點便無可置疑。在阿拉里克與蓋薩里克之後,阿提拉作為推翻羅馬帝國的重要推手位居其三,唯一的問題只在於:以這顆災星來表徵他是否恰當。以下幾點或可說明這表號的貼切之處:
(1) 如前所述,他在歷史中所佔的位置,即在帝國傾覆中緊隨阿拉里克與蓋薩里克之後。任何年表,或任何一部記載那個時代的史著的目錄,都可顯明這一點。關於阿提拉生平的詳盡記述,可見 Gibbon, vol. ii. pp. 314-351。他的生涯自主後433年延至主後453年。誠然,他與汪達爾王蓋薩里克同時代,而蓋薩里克在非洲的一部分軍事行動發生於阿提拉死後(主後455年至467年);但同樣確實的是,在征服的進程中蓋薩里克先於阿提拉,就次序而言位居第一,因他於主後428年在對羅馬的戰事中被匈人逼向前來。見 Gibbon, ii.306ff。
(2) 就其登場的方式而言,他與劃過天際的明亮流星極為相似。他從東方而來,聚集他的匈人,隨後——如我們將要看到的——以流星疾馳之勢,驟然將他們傾瀉在帝國身上。他又自視為獻身於戰神瑪爾斯的人,慣於以格外華麗的方式裝扮自己,以致用其諂媚者的話說,他的儀容足以炫惑觀者的眼目。他的一個隨從發現一頭正在吃草的小母牛傷了腳,便好奇地循著血跡追蹤,終於在長草中發現一柄古劍的劍尖,便將它從土中掘出,獻給阿提拉。「那位氣度恢宏——毋寧說那位工於心計的君主,」吉本先生說,「以敬虔的感恩領受了這天賜之物;並以瑪爾斯之劍的合法持有者自居,宣稱自己對大地的統治權乃是神聖而不可剝奪的。瑪爾斯的寵兒不久便獲得了一種神聖的性格,這使他的征戰更為輕易、更為持久;那些蠻族君王也以敬虔或諂媚的言辭承認,他們不敢以平穩的目光直視匈人之王的神聖威嚴」(ii. 317)。以一顆明亮燃燒的星——或一顆劃過天空的流星——的表號來代表這樣一位君王,何等貼切!
(3) 「有大星從天上落在地上」這話用在他身上,或許也有其貼切之處。阿提拉被視為神手中施行懲罰的工具。他為人所知的通行稱號是「上帝之鞭」。據現代匈牙利人的推測,這稱號最初是由高盧的一位隱士加給阿提拉的,但它「被阿提拉列入其王尊的諸多稱號之中」(Gibbon, ii. 321, foot-note)。這稱號用在任何人身上,都不如用在他身上那樣貼切。
(4) 他作為征服者的生涯,以及他的征戰對帝國傾覆的影響,都恰宜以這種方式來表徵:
(a) 這場入侵的總體影響,足以在敘述導致帝國傾覆的一系列事件中佔據重要位置。吉本先生的表述如下:「西方世界受壓於在匈人面前奔逃的哥特人與汪達爾人;但匈人自身的功業並不配稱其力量與繁盛。他們得勝的部落曾從伏爾加河蔓延至多瑙河,但公共武力卻因各獨立首領的傾軋而耗竭;他們的勇武虛耗於晦暗的劫掠遠征之中;他們又常因覬覦擄獲之物,不惜屈尊投效於其手下敗將的旗幟之下,而自貶國族的尊嚴。在阿提拉治下,匈人再度成為世界的恐怖;我如今要描述的,便是那可畏的蠻族——他交替侵襲、凌辱東方與西方,加速了羅馬帝國的迅速傾覆」(Gibbon, vol. ii. pp. 314-315)。
(b) 受匈人入侵影響的地區,正是那些恰宜以這號吹響時所指定之事來表徵的地方。經文特別提到其影響將臨到「江河」與「眾水的泉源」。若這有其字面的應用,或者如第二號所假定的那樣,所用的語言乃是指向帝國中將特別受敵軍入侵波及的部分,那麼我們可以設想,這裏所指的乃是帝國中江河溪流縱橫的地區,尤其是那些江河溪流的發源之地——因為其影響是永久性地落在「眾水的泉源」上。事實上,阿提拉的主要軍事行動正是在阿爾卑斯山地區,以及帝國中河水由此流入義大利的地帶。吉本先生以這樣概括的語言描述阿提拉的入侵:「歐洲全境——從黑海到亞得里亞海綿延五百餘哩——一時之間盡遭阿提拉率入戰場的無數蠻族入侵、佔據並蹂躪」(ii. 319-320)。
在描述了這場入侵的進程與影響之後(pp. 320-331),他進而更詳細地記述入侵高盧與義大利的諸事件(pp. 331-347)。在可怕的沙隆之戰中——按一種說法有十六萬二千人被殺,按另一些說法則達三十萬人——阿提拉被擊敗;但他重振聲威,收拾兵力,揮師入侵義大利。他藉口要娶羅馬帝后的女兒霍諾里亞為妻,「這位憤怒的求婚者率軍出戰,越過阿爾卑斯山,侵入義大利,率領無數蠻族圍攻阿奎萊亞」。在徒然努力三個月未能攻克該城、正要放棄圍攻之際,阿提拉利用一隻鸛鳥的出現作為吉兆,激勵部下重新奮力攻城,「在鸛鳥飛去的那段城牆上,被打開了一個大缺口;匈人以不可抵擋的狂暴登城猛攻;後一代的人幾乎找不到阿奎萊亞的廢墟。在這可怕的懲罰之後,阿提拉繼續進軍;他所經之處,阿爾提努姆、康科迪亞、帕多瓦諸城盡成石堆灰燼。內陸的城邑維琴察、維羅納、貝加莫,暴露於匈人貪婪的殘暴之下;米蘭與帕維亞不戰而降,任憑財富被奪,還稱頌那保存公共與私人建築免於火焚、並饒恕被擄眾人性命的罕有寬仁。科莫、都靈、摩德納的民間傳說固然大可懷疑,但它們與更可信的證據一同表明:阿提拉將其蹂躪遍及現今倫巴第的富饒平原——那片為波河所分割、以阿爾卑斯山與亞平寧山脈為界的土地」(ii. pp. 343-344)。「有一句話足以道盡阿提拉兇殘的驕傲:他的馬蹄踏過之處,青草不生」(同上,p. 345)。任何人只要查看地圖,追尋那些蹂躪的進程與他軍事行動的主要所在地,便能看出以這表號來描述他是何等貼切。滋潤歐洲的大河皆發源於這些地區,並因無數自阿爾卑斯山流下的溪流而水量大增;而這入侵者主要的軍事行動,正是圍繞著這些溪流的源頭進行。
(c) 這表號中說他影響這些江河與泉源的「三分之一」,同樣有其貼切之處。在他兇殘的進軍中,帝國至少有三分之一遭到入侵與蹂躪;其入侵對帝國造成的災禍,就如同一顆苦星墜入這些江河泉源的三分之一之中、使其化為茵蔯一樣。
(d) 還有一點可表明這表號的貼切:這流星——或說這星——似乎被水吞沒了。它墜入水中,使水變苦,便再也看不見了。一顆這樣落在地上的流星也必如此——劃過天空,隨即永遠消失。而說到匈人,值得注意之處正在於:他們的權力集中於阿提拉一人之下;唯有他以這支可畏大軍之首領的身分出現;而當他死去,匈人聚集的一切權力便煙消雲散,被吸收殆盡而歸於無有。「那場顛覆匈人帝國的變革,」吉本先生說(ii. 348),「確立了阿提拉的名聲,因為單憑他的才幹支撐著這龐大而鬆散的架構。他死之後,最大膽的首領們覬覦王位;最強大的君王們拒絕承認任何尊於己者;而那位已故君主由眾多不同母親所生的諸子,便像瓜分私產一樣,分割並爭奪對日耳曼與西徐亞諸民族的統治權。」然而不久,在隨後的衝突中,這帝國便成過往,匈人的帝國不復存在。組成這帝國的民眾被周圍的諸民族吸收同化。吉本先生在概述了這些僅延續數年的衝突後評論道:「北方的伊格烏爾人,從出產最珍貴毛皮的酷寒西伯利亞地區而出,散佈於荒漠之間,遠達波呂斯忒涅斯河與裏海門,最終熄滅了匈人的帝國。」這些事實或許可以表明:將阿提拉比作一顆明亮而美好的流星是何等貼切;況且,若原意正是要表徵他在羅馬帝國傾覆中所扮演的重要角色,那麼此處所用的表號實在再合宜不過。
英文原文
And the name of the star is called Wormwood - Is appropriately so called. The writer does not say that it would be actually so called, but that this name would be properly descriptive of its qualities. Such expressions are common in allegorical writings. The Greek word - ἄψινθος apsinthos - denotes "wormwood," a well-known bitter herb. That word becomes the proper emblem of bitterness. Compare Jeremiah 9:15; Jeremiah 23:15; Lamentations 3:15, Lamentations 3:19.
And the third part of the waters became wormwood - Became bitter as wormwood. This is doubtless an emblem of the calamity which would occur if the waters should be thus made bitter. Of course they would become useless for the purposes to which they are mostly applied, and the destruction of life would be inevitable. To conceive of the extent of such a calamity we have only to imagine a large portion of the wells, and rivers, and fountains of a country made bitter as wormwood. Compare Exodus 15:23-24.
And many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter - This effect would naturally follow if any considerable portion of the fountains and streams of a land were changed by an infusion of wormwood. It is not necessary to suppose that this is intended to be literally true; for as, by the use of a symbol, it is not to be supposed that literally a part of the waters would be turned into wormwood by the baleful influence of a falling meteor, so it is not necessary to suppose that there is intended to be represented a literal destruction of human life by the use of waters. Great destruction and devastation are undoubtedly intended to be denoted by this - destruction that would be well represented in a land by the natural effects if a considerable part of the waters were, by their bitterness, made unfit to drink.
In the interpretation and application, therefore, of this passage, we may adopt the following principles and rules:
(a) It may be assumed, in this exposition, that the previous symbols, under the first and second trumpet-blasts, referred respectively to Alaric and his Goths, and to Genseric and his Vandals.
(b) That the next great and decisive event in the downfall of the empire is the one that is here referred to.
(c) That there would be some chieftain or warrior who might be compared with a blazing meteor; whose course would be singularly brilliant; who would appear suddenly like a blazing star, and then disappear like a star whose light was quenched in the waters.
(d) That the desolating course of that meteor would be mainly on those portions of the world that abounded with springs of water and running streams.
(e) That an effect would be produced as if those streams and fountains were made bitter; that is, that many persons would perish, and that wide desolations would be caused in the vicinity of those rivers and streams, as if a bitter and baleful star should fall into the waters, and death should spread over the lands adjacent to them, and watered by them.
Whether any events occurred of which this would be the proper emblem is now the question. Among expositors there has been a considerable degree of unanimity in supposing that Attila, the king of the Huns, is referred to; and if the preceding expositions are correct, there can be no doubt on the subject. After Alaric and Genseric, Attila occupies the next place as an important agent in the overthrow of the Roman empire, and the only question is, whether he would be properly symbolized by this baleful star. The following remarks may be made to show the propriety of the symbol:
(1) As already remarked, the place which he occupies in history, as immediately succeeding Alaric and Genseric in the downfall of the empire. This will appear in any chronological table, or in the table of contents of any of the histories of those times. A full detail of the career of Attila may be found in Gibbon, vol. ii. pp. 314-351. His career extended from 433 a.d. to 453 a.d. It is true that he was contemporary with Genseric, king of the Vandals, and that a portion of the operations of Genseric in Africa were subsequent to the death of Attila (455 a.d. to 467 a.d.); but it is also true that Genseric preceded Attila in the career of conquest, and was properly the first in order, being pressed forward in the Roman warfare by the Huns, 428 a.d. See Gibbon, ii.306ff.
(2) In the manner of his appearance he strongly resembled a brilliant meteor flashing in the sky. He came from the east, gathering his Huns, and poured them down, as we shall see, with the rapidity of a flashing meteor, suddenly on the empire. He regarded himself also as devoted to Mars, the god of war, and was accustomed to array himself in a especially brilliant manner, so that his appearance, in the language of his flatterers, was such as to dazzle the eyes of beholders. One of his followers perceived that a heifer that was grazing had wounded her foot, and curiously followed the track of blood, until he found in the long grass the point of an ancient sword, which he dug out of the ground and presented to Attila. "That magnanimous, or rather that artful prince," says Mr. Gibbon, "accepted with pious gratitude this celestial favor; and, as the rightful possessor of the sword of Mars, asserted his divine and indefeasible claim to the dominion of the earth. The favorite of Mars soon acquired a sacred character, which rendered his conquests more easy and more permanent; and the barbarian princes confessed, in the language of devotion or flattery, that they could not presume to gaze, with a steady eye, on the divine majesty of the king of the Huns," ii. 317. How appropriate would it be to represent such a prince by the symbol of a bright and blazing star - or a meteor flashing through the sky!
(3) there may be propriety, as applicable to him, in the expression - "a great star from heaven failing upon the earth." Attila was regarded as an instrument in the divine hand in inflicting punishment. The common appellation by which he has been known is "the scourge of God." This title is supposed by the modern Hungarians to have been first given to Attila by a hermit of Gaul, but it was "inserted by Attila among the titles of his royal dignity" (Gibbon, ii. 321, foot-note). To no one could the title be more applicable than to him.
(4) his career as a conqueror, and the effect of his conquests on the downfall of the empire, were such as to be properly symbolized in this manner:
(a) The general effect of the invasion was worthy of an important place in describing the series of events which resulted in the overthrow of the empire. This is thus stated by Mr. Gibbon: "The western world was oppressed by the Goths and Vandals, who fled before the Huns; but the achievements of the Huns themselves were not adequate to their power and prosperity. Their victorious hordes had spread from the Volga to the Danube, but the public force was exhausted by the discord of independent chieftains; their valor was idly consumed in obscure and predatory excursions; and they often degraded their national dignity by condescending, for the hopes of spoil, to enlist under the banners of their fugitive enemies. In the reign of Attila the Huns again became the terror of the world; and I shall now describe the character and actions of that formidable barbarian who alternately invaded and insulted the East and the West, and urged the rapid downfall of the Roman empire, 'vol. ii. pp. 314, 315.
(b) The parts of the earth affected by the invasion of the Huns were those which would be properly symbolized by the things specified at the blowing of this trumpet. It is said particularly that the effect would be on "the rivers," and on "the fountains of waters." If this has a literal application, or if, as was supposed in the case of the second trumpet, the language used was such as had reference to the portion of the empire that would be particularly affected by the hostile invasion, then we may suppose that this refers to those portions of the empire that abounded in rivers and streams, and more particularly those in which the rivers and streams had their origin - for the effect was permanently in the "fountains of waters." As a matter of fact, the principal operations of Attila were in the regions of the Alps, and on the portions of the empire whence the rivers flow down into Italy. The invasion of Attila is described by Mr. Gibbon in this general language: "The whole breadth of Europe, as it extends above five hundred miles from the Euxine to the Adriatic, was at once invaded, and occupied, and desolated, by the myriads of barbarians whom Attila led into the field," ii. 319, 320.
After describing the progress and the effects of this invasion (pp. 320-331) he proceeds more particularly to detail the events in the invasion of Gaul and Italy, pp. 331-347. After the terrible battle of Chalons, in which, according to one account, one hundred and sixty-two thousand, and, according to other accounts, three hundred thousand persons were slain, and in which Attila was defeated, he recovered his vigor, collected his forces, and made a descent on Italy. Under pretence of claiming Honoria, the daughter of the Empress of Rome, as his bride, "the indignant lover took the field, passed the Alps, invaded Italy, and besieged Aquileia with an innumerable host of barbarians." After endeavoring in vain for three months to subdue the city, and when about to abandon the siege, Attila took advantage of the appearance of a stork as a favorable omen to arouse his men to a renewed effort, "a large breach was made in the part of the wall where the stork had taken her flight; the Huns mounted to the assault with irresistible fury; and the succeeding generation could scarcely discover the ruins of Aquileia. After this dreadful chastisement Attila pursued his march; and as he passed, the cities of Altinum, Concordia, and Padua were reduced into heaps of stones and ashes. The inland towns, Vicenza, Verona, and Bergamo, were exposed to the rapacious cruelty of the Huns; Milan and Pavia submitted without resistance to the loss of their wealth, and applauded the unusual clemency which preserved from the flames the public as well as the private buildings, and spared the lives of the captive multitude. The popular traditions of Comum, Turin, or Modena, may be justly suspected, yet they concur with more authentic evidence to prove that Attila spread his ravages over the rich plains of modern Lombardy, which are divided by the Po, and bounded by the Alps and the Apennines," ii. pp. 343, 344. "It is a saying worthy of the ferocious pride of Attila, that the grass never grew on the spot where his horse had trod" (ibid. p. 345). Anyone has only to look on a map, and to trace the progress of those desolations and the chief seats of his military operations to see with what propriety this symbol would be employed. In these regions the great rivers that water Europe have their origin, and are swelled by numberless streams that flow down from the Alps; and about the fountains whence these streams flow were the principal military operations of the invader.
(c) With equal propriety is he represented in the symbol as affecting "a third" part of these rivers and fountains. At least a third part of the empire was invaded and desolated by him in his savage march, and the effects of his invasion were as disastrous on the empire as if a bitter star had fallen into a third part of those rivers and fountains, and had converted them into wormwood.
(d) There is one other point which shows the propriety of this symbol. It is, that the meteor, or star, seemed to be absorbed in the waters. It fell into the waters; embittered them; and was seen no more. Such would be the case with a meteor that should thus fall upon the earth - flashing along the sky, and then disappearing forever. Now, it was remarkable in regard to the Huns, that their power was concentrated under Attila; that he alone appeared as the leader of this formidable host; and that when he died all the concentrated power of the Huns was dissipated, or became absorbed and lost. "The revolution," says Mr. Gibbon (ii. 348), "which subverted the empire of the Huns, established the fame of Attila, whose genius alone had sustained the huge and disjointed fabric. After his death the boldest chieftains aspired to the rank of kings; the most powerful kings refused to acknowledge a superior; and the numerous sons, whom so many various mothers bore to the deceased monarch, divided and disputed, like a private inheritance, the sovereign command of the nations of Germany and Scythia." Soon, however, in the conflicts which succeeded, the empire passed away, and the empire of the Huns ceased. The people that composed it were absorbed in the surrounding nations, and Mr. Gibbon makes this remark, after giving a summary account of these conflicts, which continued but for a few years: "The Igours of the north, issuing from the cold Siberian regions, which produced the most valuable furs, spread themselves over the desert, as far as the Borysthenes and the Caspian gates, and finally extinguished the empire of the Huns." These facts may, perhaps, show with what propriety Attila would be compared with a bright but beautiful meteor; and that, if the design was to symbolize him as acting an important part in the downfall of the Roman empire, there is a fitness in the symbol here employed.
12
Revelation 8:12
「第四位天使吹號」——見 Revelation 8:6-7 的註釋。
「日頭的三分之一……被擊打」——關於「三分之一」這說法,見 Revelation 8:7 的註釋。天上光體的變暗,處處都是大災禍的表徵——彷彿日、月、星辰的光都熄滅了。見 Revelation 6:12-13 的註釋。沒有確實的證據表明這是指統治者——如許多人所設想的那樣——或指任何特別影響政府本身的事物。其含義是:災禍將要來到,如同黑暗漫過日、月、星辰,使世界陷於幽暗。語言並未指明災禍的確切性質;但任何能散布幽暗與災殃的事物,都與這表號的公正含義相合。不過,關於這表號有幾項情節,或可幫助我們確定其應用:
(1) 它將隨在將要發生的一系列災禍之後。
(2) 它將在某種重要意義上——時間、地點或程度——與隨後的災禍分開,因為此處有一個停頓(Revelation 8:13),天使宣告比這一系列更可怖的災禍還要接踵而來。
(3) 與前一樣,它要影響世界的「三分之一」;即這災禍如同日、月、星辰的三分之一突然被擊打、變暗。
(4) 它不是全面的。並非日、月、星辰全然熄滅,因為仍有餘光;即現存事態仍在延續——彷彿這些天體仍發出昏暗而局部的光。
(5) 這表號或許也有意思表明,光還要再現。世界並不是要進入全然而永久的黑夜。在白晝的三分之一、黑夜的三分之一,這黑暗掌權;但這豈不暗示光要再現——幽暗要過去,日、月、星辰要再放光嗎?即:豈不暗示在某個未來時期仍會有繁榮嗎?至於這事的應用,若前文對諸表號的解釋正確,便沒有多大困難。若先前的表號指阿拉里克、蓋薩里克和阿提拉,那麼把這應用於奧多亞克及其統治,便毫無困難——在那統治之下,羅馬在西方的統治權實際告終,落入這蠻族之手。任何人只需翻開《羅馬帝國衰亡史》,便會看出:若設計的目的正是描繪帝國的傾覆,這正是下一個當以表號描繪的事件。
這四個偉大的蠻族首領依次相繼;在最後一位——奧多亞克——之下,蠻族的統治建立起來;因為正是在此,羅馬權勢本身的存在宣告結束。照吉本先生的記載(ii. p. 380),西方帝國約於主後476或479年終結。奧多亞克自主後476年至490年作「義大利之王」(Gibbon, ii. 379)。東方帝國仍苟延一息;但災禍——如同把日、月、星辰都抹去——已經臨到那多個世紀以來構成權勢與統治寶座的那部分世界。奧多亞克是蠻族埃德科之子;埃德科曾服役於阿提拉,遺下二子——奧努爾夫與奧多亞克。前者奔向君士坦丁堡;奧多亞克則「在諾里庫姆的蠻族中間過著漂泊的生活,其心志與際遇皆宜於最冒險的孤注一擲;他既已拿定主意,便虔誠地拜訪了當地廣得民心的聖徒塞維里努斯的小室,以求他的嘉許與祝福。門的低矮容不下奧多亞克高大的身軀;他只得俯身而入;但聖徒就在那謙卑的姿態中,看出他未來偉大的徵兆;並以先知的口吻對他說:『去追求吧,』他說,『你的志業;往義大利去;你不久就要拋棄這身粗陋的皮衣;你的財富將配得上你心胸的慷慨。』這膽氣十足的蠻族接受並認定了這預言,被納入西方帝國的軍中,不久便在衛隊中獲得尊榮的職位。
他的儀態漸漸文雅,他的兵藝日見長進;義大利的同盟者們若非奧多亞克的功勳已確立了對其勇武與才幹的高度評價,是不會選他作將軍的。軍中的歡呼以王的名號向他致意;但他在整個在位期間避免使用紫袍與冠冕,唯恐觸怒那些君王——他們的臣民因偶然的混合,已組成那支得勝的大軍,時間與政策或許會不知不覺把它們聯成一個大國」(Gibbon, ii. 379-380)。吉本先生在另一處說:「奧多亞克是第一個在義大利稱王的蠻族,所統治的,是一個曾經宣稱優越於全人類的民族。羅馬人所受的恥辱至今仍引起我們敬重的同情;我們也樂於同情他們墮落的後裔那想像中的悲傷與憤慨。但義大利的災禍已逐漸制服了那自由與榮耀的驕傲意識。在羅馬德行的時代,行省服於共和國的武力,公民服於共和國的法律;直到那些法律被內亂顛覆,城邑與行省便同成為暴君奴顏婢膝的私產。曾經減輕或掩飾他們卑賤奴役的憲制形式,被時間與暴力廢除;義大利人輪番哀嘆他們所憎惡或鄙視的君王之或在或不在;五個世紀的更迭加給他們軍事放縱、任性專制與苛密壓迫的種種禍害。
在同一時期,蠻族已從隱微與輕蔑中崛起;日耳曼與西徐亞的武士被引入行省,先作羅馬人的僕役,繼作同盟,最終作了主人——對羅馬人或者侮辱,或者保護」(ii. 381-382)。論到奧多亞克統治的影響,吉本先生評述道:「在帝國的分裂與衰微中,埃及與阿非利加的貢糧被奪去;居民的人數隨生計之資而不斷減少;國家被戰爭、饑荒與瘟疫那無可挽回的損耗所竭盡。安波羅修曾哀嘆一個人煙稠密之地的荒涼——那地曾以博洛尼亞、摩德納、雷久姆和普拉森提亞等繁盛之城為妝飾。教宗傑拉一世是奧多亞克的臣民;他近乎誇大地斷言,在埃米利亞、托斯卡尼及鄰近行省,人類幾乎被滅絕。那些被指為義大利禍根的廣大田產,有三分之一被勒索去供征服者使用」(ii. 383)。
然而光並未全然熄滅。熄滅的只是它的「三分之一」;古代政制的某些形式仍被遵行——這是事實——光在完全消逝之前仍徘徊不去。用另一個人的話說:「羅馬之名的權威尚未完全止息。羅馬的元老院照常聚會。執政官每年仍被任命——一位由東方皇帝任命,一位由義大利和羅馬任命。奧多亞克自己以東方皇帝授給他的頭銜——貴族(Patrician)——治理義大利。對至高皇權仍有一定——雖然常常微弱——的承認。月亮和星辰或許看來仍以朦朧的反照之光在西方便亮。然而,在隨後半個世紀迅速接踵的事件中,這些也都熄滅了。經過將近一個半世紀幾乎史無前例的災禍——如羅伯遜博士極真實地描繪的那樣——耶柔米的話——一段用與本段經文相同的啟示錄式筆法寫成、卻在阿拉里克初次攻取羅馬時便過早發出的話——終於可以視為應驗了:『Clarissimum terrarum lumen extincturn est』——『世界榮耀的太陽已經熄滅』;或者,如現代詩人拜倫(《恰爾德·哈羅爾德遊記》第四歌)仍以啟示錄的意象所表達的:
『她看見她的榮耀一星接一星地熄滅,』
直到連一顆星也不剩,在空虛黑暗的夜中閃爍」(Elliott, i. 360-361)。
這樣,我便努力解釋了第七印揭開之下前四號的含義——涵蓋阿拉里克、蓋薩里克、阿提拉和奧多亞克相繼加於帝國的重擊,直到帝國傾覆、不再興起。結束這一部分的解釋,再沒有比吉本先生論帝國傾覆的感想更好的話了。「我如今已完成了,」他說,「那部勞苦的史述——羅馬帝國自圖拉真與安東尼諸帝的幸運時代,直到主後約五世紀在西方的完全消亡。在那不幸的時期,撒克遜人正兇猛地與土著爭奪不列顛;高盧與西班牙分屬法蘭克與西哥特兩大強盛君主國、以及蘇維匯和勃艮第兩個從屬王國;阿非利加暴露於汪達爾人殘酷的逼迫和摩爾人野蠻的凌辱;羅馬和義大利,遠至多瑙河岸,受一支蠻族傭兵大軍的荼毒,隨後繼之而來的是東哥特人狄奧多里克的統治。帝國中一切因使用拉丁語而更配得羅馬人之名與特權的臣民,都被外族征服的恥辱與災禍所壓制;得勝的日耳曼諸族在歐洲西部諸國建立了新的風俗與政制。羅馬的尊嚴,由君士坦丁堡的諸帝——奧古斯都那些衰弱而虛擬的繼承者——微弱地代表著」(vol. ii. pp. 440-441)。「奧古斯都與圖拉真那些輝煌的日子,被一片無知的烏雲所遮蔽(這是『日頭的三分之一被擊打,白晝的三分之一沒有光,黑夜也是這樣』這話的絕佳例證);蠻族顛覆了羅馬的法律與宮殿」(同上,p. 446)。
哥特時期的歷史——亦如我所設想,西方帝國事務直接的表號性描繪——至此結束。如今,號的吹響出現了一個間隔(Revelation 8:13),在其餘三號中,場景轉到帝國的東部。此後,注意力再度轉向西方,默想在教皇制之下以新形態出現、對列國施加新影響的羅馬;但其屬靈權勢終必消逝,正如其屬世權勢曾屈服於內裏腐朽的因素和北方群體的入侵一樣。
英文原文
And the fourth angel sounded - See the notes at Revelation 8:6-7.
And the third part of the sea was smitten - On the phrase the third part, see the notes on Revelation 8:7. The darkening of the heavenly luminaries is everywhere an emblem of any great calamity - as if the light of the sun, moon, and stars should be put out. See the notes on Revelation 6:12-13. There is no certain evidence that this refers to rulers, as many have supposed, or to anything that would particularly affect the government as such. The meaning is, that calamity would come as if darkness should spread over the sun, the moon, and the stars, leaving the world in gloom. What is the precise nature of the calamity is not indicated by the language, but anything that would diffuse gloom and disaster would accord with the fair meaning of the symbol. There are a few circumstances, however, in regard to this symbol which may aid us in determining its application:
(1) It would follow in the series of calamities that were to occur.
(2) it would be separated in some important sense - of time, place, or degree - from those which were to follow, for there is a pause here Revelation 8:13, and the angel proclaims that more terrible woes are to succeed this series.
(3) like the preceding, it is to affect "one third part" of the world; that is, it is to be a calamity as if a third part of the sun, the moon, and the stars were suddenly smitten and darkened.
(4) it is not to be total. It is not as if the sun, the moon, and the stars were entirely blotted out, for there was still some remaining light; that is, there was a continuance of the existing state of things - as if these heavenly bodies should still give an obscure and partial light.
(5) perhaps it is also intended by the symbol that there would be light again. The world was not to go into a state of total and permanent night. For a third part of the day, and a third part of the night, this darkness reigned; but does not this imply that there would be light again - that the obscurity would pass away, and that the sun, and moon, and stars would shine again? That is, is it not implied that there would still be prosperity in some future period? Now, in regard to the application of this, if the explanation of the preceding symbols is correct, there can be little difficulty. If the previous symbols referred to Alaric, to Genseric, and to Attila, there can be no difficulty in applying this to Odoacer, and to his reign - a reign in which, in fact, the Roman dominion in the West came to an end, and passed into the hands of this barbarian. Anyone has only to open the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, to see that this is the next event that should be symbolized if the design were to represent the downfall of the empire.
These four great barbarian leaders succeed each other in order, and under the last, Odoacer, the barbarian dominion was established; for it is here that the existence of the Roman power, as such, ended. The Western empire terminated, according to Mr. Gibbon (ii. p. 380), about 476 or 479 a.d. Odoacer was "King of Italy" from 476 a.d. to 490 a.d. (Gibbon, ii. 379). The Eastern empire still lingered, but calamity, like blotting out the sun, and moon, and stars, had come over that part of the world which for so many centuries had constituted the seat of power and dominion. Odoacer was the son of Edecon, a barbarian, who was in the service of Attila, and who left two sons - Onulf and Odoacer. The former directed his steps to Constantinople; Oloacer "led a wandering life among the barbarians of Noricum, with a mind and fortune suited to the most desperate adventures; and when he had fixed his choice, he piously visited the cell of Severinus, the popular saint of the country, to solicit his approbation and blessing. The lowness of the door would not admit the lofty stature of Odoacer; he was obliged to stoop; but in that humble attitude the saint could discern the symptoms of his future greatness; and addressing him in a prophetic tone, 'Pursue,' said he, 'your design; proceed to Italy; you will soon cast away this coarse garment of skins; and your wealth will be adequate to the liberality of your mind.' The barbarian, whose daring spirit accepted and ratified this prediction, was admitted into the service of the Western empire, and soon obtained an honorable rank in the guards.
His manners were gradually polished, his military skill improved; and the confederates of Italy would not have elected him for their general unless the exploits of Odoacer had established a high opinion of his courage and capacity. Their military acclamations saluted him with the title of king; but he abstained during his whole reign from the use of the purple and the diadem, lest he should offend those princes whose subjects, by their accidental mixture, had formed the victorious army which time and policy might insensibly unite into a great nation" (Gibbon, ii. 379, 380). In another place Mr. Gibbon says: "Odoacer was the first barbarian who reigned in Italy, over a people who had once asserted their superiority above the rest of mankind. The disgrace of the Romans still excites our respectful compassion, and we fondly sympathize with the imaginary grief and indignation of their degenerate posterity. But the calamities of Italy had gradually subdued the proud consciousness of freedom and glory. In the age of Roman virtue the provinces were subject to the arms, and the citizens to the laws, of the republic; until those laws were subverted by civil discord, and both the city and the provinces became the servile property of a tyrant. The forms of the constitution which alleviated or disguised their abject slavery were abolished by time and violence; the Italians alternately lamented the presence or the absence of the sovereigns whom they detested or despised; and the succession of five centuries inflicted the various evils of military license, capricious despotism, and elaborate oppression.
During the same period the barbarians had emerged from obscurity and contempt, and the warriors of Germany and Scythia were introduced into the provinces, as the servants, the allies, and at length the masters of the Romans, whom they insulted or protected," ii. 381, 382. Of the effect of the reign of Odoacer Mr. Gibbon remarks: "In the division and decline of the empire the tributary harvests of Egypt and Africa were withdrawn; the numbers of the inhabitants continually decreased with the means of subsistence; and the country was exhausted by the irretrievable losses of war, famine, and pestilence. Ambrose has deplored the ruin of a populous district, which had been once adorned with the flourishing cities of Bologna, Modena, Rhegium, and Placentia. Pope Gelasius was a subject of Odoacer; and he affirms, with strong exaggeration, that in Aemilia, Tuscany, and the adjacent provinces the human species was almost extirpated. One-third of those ample estates, to which the ruin of Italy is originally imputed, was extorted for the use of the conquerors," ii.383.
Yet the light was not wholly extinct. It was "a third part" of it which was put out; and it was still true that some of the forms of the ancient constitution were observed - that the light still lingered before it wholly passed away. In the language of another, "The authority of the Roman name had not yet entirely ceased. The senate of Rome continued to assemble as usual. The consuls were appointed yearly, one by the Eastern emperor, one by Italy and Rome. Odoacer himself governed Italy under a title - that of Patrician - conferred on him by the Eastern emperor. There was still a certain, though often faint, recognition of the supreme imperial authority. The moon and the stars might seem still to shine in the West, with a dim reflected light. In the course of the events, however, which rapidly followed in the next half-century, these too were extinguished. After above a century and a half of calamities unexampled almost, as Dr. Robertson most truly represents it, in the history of nations, the statement of Jerome - a statement couched under the very Apocalyptic figure of the text, but prematurely pronounced on the first taking of Rome by Alaric - might be considered at length accomplished: 'Clarissimum terrarum lumen extincturn est' - 'The world's glorious sun has been extinguished;' or, as the modern poet Byron (Childe Harold, canto iv.) has expressed it, still under the Apocalyptic imagery:
'She saw her glories star by star expire, '
Till not even one star remained to glimmer in the vacant and dark night" (Elliott, i. 360, 361).
I have thus endeavored to explain the meaning of the four first trumpets under the opening of the seventh seal, embracing the successive severe blows struck on the empire by Alaric, Genseric, Attila, and Odoacer, until the empire fell, to rise no more. I cannot better conclude this part of the exposition than in the words of Mr. Gibbon, in his reflections on the fall of the empire. "I have now accomplished," says he, "the laborious narrative of the decline and fall of the Roman empire, from the fortunate age of Trajan and the Antonines to its total extinction in the West, about five centuries after the Christian era. At that unhappy period the Saxons fiercely struggled with the natives for the possession of Britain; Gaul and Spain were divided between the powerful monarchies of the Franks and the Visigoths, and the dependent kingdoms of the Suevi and the Burgundians; Africa was exposed to the cruel persecution of the Vandals, and the savage insults of the Moors; Rome and Italy, as far as the banks of the Danube, were afflicted by an army of barbarian mercenaries, whose lawless tyranny was succeeded by the reign of Theodoric the Ostrogoth. All the subjects of the empire, who, by the use of the Latin language, more particularly deserved the name and privileges of Romans, were oppressed by the disgrace and calamities of foreign conquest; and the victorious nations of Germany established a new system of manners and government in the western countries of Europe. The majesty of Rome was faintly represented by the princes of Constantinople, the feeble and imaginary successors of Augustus" (vol. ii. pp. 440, 441). "The splendid days of Augustus and Trajan were eclipsed by a cloud of ignorance (a fine illustration of the language 'the third part of the sun was smitten, and the day shone not, and the night likewise'); and the barbarians subverted the laws and palaces of Rome" (ibid. p. 446).
Thus ended the history of the Gothic period, and, as I suppose, the immediate symbolic representation of the affairs of the Western empire. An interval now occurs Revelation 8:13 in the sounding of the trumpets, and the scene is transferred, in the three remaining trumpets, to the Eastern parts of the empire. After that the attention is directed again to the West, to contemplate Rome under a new form, and exerting a new influence in the nations, under the papacy, but destined ultimately to pass away in its spiritual power, as its temporal power had yielded to the elements of internal decay in its bosom, and to the invasions of the northern hordes.
13
Revelation 8:13
我又看見——一個新的異象吸引了我的注意。
並聽見一位天使飛在空中……——我聽見一位天使宣告這話的聲音。
禍哉!禍哉!禍哉!——意即將有大禍。這詞的重複是加強語氣,其觀念乃是:其餘三枝號的吹響,將表明巨大而可怖的災禍。這三者被歸為一組,彷彿屬於一系列相似的事件,正如先前四枝號一樣。這兩組之間以這間隔和這宣告彼此分開——暗示第一系列已經結束,在另一系列臨到世界之前,將有某種空間或時間上的間隔。這裏所合理暗示的一切,都可以用這樣的假設來滿全:前者指西方,後者屬於東方,並將在前者完成之後接續發生。
英文原文
And I beheld - My attention was attracted by a new vision.
And heard an angel flying, ... - I heard the voice of an angel making this proclamation.
Woe, woe, woe - That is, there will be great woe. The repetition of the word is intensive, and the idea is, that the sounding of the three remaining trumpets would indicate great and fearful calamities. These three are grouped together as if they pertained to a similar series of events, as the first four had been. The two classes are separated from each other by this interval and by this proclamation - implying that the first series had been completed, and that there would be some interval, either of space or time, before the other series would come upon the world. All that is fairly implied here would be fulfilled by the supposition that the former referred to the West, and that the latter pertained to the East, and were to follow when those should have been completed.
本章分析
奧秘書卷(5:1)還有一印未揭——六印已經揭示了書卷中關乎未來的內容。第七印——也是最後一印——的揭開自然應當伴隨着特別莊嚴的情景,因為這是這書卷中尚待展開的全部內容,而迄今為止的事件明顯是為某場大災難所作的預備。我們自然會期望,這一印像先前六印一樣立刻揭開,一覽無遺地啟示一切將要發生的事。但事實並非如此;這一印的揭開隨之而來的是一系列事件——也是七個——相繼發生,由新的象徵——同樣數量的號筒相繼吹響——來代表。這些情況使行動的進程減緩,將注意力固定在一個新的事件序列上——這些事件可以恰當地歸為一組,而且出於某種原因,如此比在如此多相繼的印中更能恰當地呈現它們。這種安排的原因將在考察相繼號聲所指向的具體事件時更清楚地看到。本章的要點如下:
(一)第七印的揭開(8:1)。這不是像先前的印那樣伴隨着對將要發生之事的立即展示,而是伴隨着天上半小時的莊嚴寂靜。這寂靜的原因,顯然在於所預期之事的莊嚴性質。第六印揭開時(6:12及以下),世界歷史的大災難似乎即將發生。這一度被懸而未決——彷彿被執掌風和暴風的天使的能力所攔阻(第七章);如今自然可以期望會有一系列勢不可擋的災難。鑑於這些預期的恐怖,天上的居民被描繪為站在可畏的寂靜中——彷彿期待並畏懼將要發生的事。這一情節大大增加了場景的趣味性,是人心在預期可怕事件時自然採取之姿態的有力例證。寂靜——莊嚴而可畏的寂靜——是人心在這種情形下的自然狀態。按照這種對將來之事的期待,引入了一系列新的呈現——適合為即將作出的可怕啟示預備人心。
(二)印揭開時,有七位天使出現,他們被賜予七枝號筒——彷彿他們被指定在引入隨後的事件系列中擔任重要角色(8:2)。
(三)作為更進一步的預備,另有一位天使被引入——他拿着金香爐站在祭壇旁(8:3-5)。他被描繪為從事一項莊嚴的敬拜活動——在寶座前獻香和聖徒的禱告。這一不尋常的呈現似乎是要表明:即將發生一些非同尋常的事件,使香的上升和禱告的獻上——以求平息神的忿怒——成為恰當。在獻香和禱告之後,天使拿起香爐摔在地上;效果是有聲音、雷轟、閃電和地震。這一切似乎都是隨後可怕事件的象徵。寂靜;獻香;禱告;香爐摔在地上所產生的可怕震動——彷彿禱告未被垂聽,彷彿獻香不能挽回迫在眉睫的忿怒——這一切都是引入號筒吹響時即將臨到世界的一系列可怕災難的恰當象徵。
(四)第一位天使吹號(8:7)。隨之有雹子與火攙着血。地的三分之一——即植物世界的三分之一——樹木和一切青草被燒了。
(五)第二位天使吹號(8:8-9)。有火燒着的大山扔在海中,海的三分之一變成血,海中三分之一的有生命之物——魚和船——被毀滅了。
(六)第三位天使吹號(8:10-11)。有燒着的大星,好像火把從天落下,落在眾河的三分之一和眾水的泉源上,水就變苦了,許多人因喝水而死。
(七)第四位天使吹號(8:12)。災難臨到光源——日頭、月亮和星辰——三分之一的光被熄滅,白天的三分之一沒有光,夜晚的三分之一也沒有光。
(八)在這一階段,四號吹響之後,有一段停頓;有一位天使飛越天空中間,因為還有將要吹的號,三次宣告「禍哉」(8:13)。這裏似乎有某種自然的間隔,或某種將已發生之事與將要發生之事分開的東西。這四個因某種原因被歸為一組,與隨後的有別——彷彿後者屬於新的一類事件,雖然仍在第七印揭開所引入的同一總體組別之下。本章的分析自然引出一些一般性的評論,可以幫助我們解釋和應用它:
(a)這些事件在其順序上,無疑繼前六印揭開所指向的事件之後。它們是世界歷史中即將發生之系列的延續。有些人假定此處所象徵的事件與前六印下已經指向的事件實質上相同;或者說,在第六印揭開時有一場災難;一個系列在那裏結束後,作者以一組新的象徵回到同一時間點,以一組新的、平行的象徵重新度過同一時期。但這明顯違背了整體的設計。在開頭(5:1)展示了一卷用七印封嚴的書卷,其展開顯然會發展為相繼的事件,其全部將涵蓋一切將要啟示的事件。當這七印全部揭開、那書卷的內容全部展示之後,確實可能有另一組以另一設計重走同一領域的象徵;或以其他視角呈現未來的事件;但這一系列顯然不應在全部七印揭開之前被中斷,也不應假定在同一書卷的揭開中有對事件進程的攔阻,以便再次回到同一起點。
這一系列象徵的呈現如同拉開望遠鏡。望遠鏡可以像通常那樣分為若干部分,也可以分為七部分;例如第七部分的拉出可以被視為第七印揭開的呈現。但第七部分不像其他六部分那樣是一整塊,它可能被構造為可再分為七個較小的部分,每個代表第七部分的較小部分。在這種情形下,第七部分的拉出繼其他部分之後,是要代表一個隨後的事件序列。
(b)顯然有某種原因,使這最後七個事件——或七號所代表的系列——可以歸在一個總體分類之下。它們足夠分明,使之適合以不同的象徵來代表;但它們有如此多的共同總體特徵,使之適合歸在一起。如果不是這樣,那就適合以延續到十三個的印來代表它們,而不是代表六個相繼的印,然後在第七印下再有一個同樣延續到七個的新系列。在應驗中,我們當尋找那些有某種如此自然的聯繫和關係的事件——它們因某種原因可以被歸為一類,但又如此分明——以至於在印的同一總體象徵下,它們可以在號筒的特定象徵下被代表。
(c)出於某種原因,前四號所代表的事件與隨後的事件之間有進一步的區別。有某種原因使它們更特別地歸為一組,緊密相連,並且在其他號筒吹響之前應當有間隔(8:13)。在這應驗中,我們自然當尋找這樣的事件順序——由四個相繼的象徵所指定;然後是在某些方面如此大的改變——以至於使間隔成為恰當的,並在另外三號吹響之前有禍哉的宣告(8:13)。然後自然要尋找那些可以恰當地歸在其餘三個象徵——隨後的三號——之下的事件。
(d)正如已經暗示的,自然可以假定這整個組別至少在某種一般性的方式上會延伸到萬事的成全;或者在最後一個之下會有對萬事成全——世界末了——的指涉。其原因已經給出:使徒看見一卷書卷(5:1),其中含有關乎未來的封閉記載;自然可以假定其中會提到教會和世界歷史中將要發生的那些重大主導事件。這一自然的期待由第七號吹響下所揭示的事件所證實(11:15及以下):「第七位天使吹號;天上有大聲音說:世上的國成了我主和主基督的國;他要作王,直到永永遠遠。在神面前坐在自己位上的二十四位長老,就面伏於地,敬拜神,說:主神——全能者啊,我們感謝你!因你執掌大權作王了」等等。無論如何,這將引導我們到基督教的最終勝利——到榮耀千禧年的引進——到神之子在地上作王的時期。在那之後(11:19及以下),一個新的異象系列開始,透過歷史的同一些時期,揭示教會的一個新視角——也直到她最終的勝利:教會的內部狀況;敵基督的興起,以及這一令人生畏的權勢興起的影響。見本書分析第五部分。