Matthew Henry's Complete Commentary · Malachi 第1章

註釋閱讀最佳化

分章註釋

Malachi 第 1 章

서론

無標題

開啟正文

這位先知被差遣,先要責備,後要安慰;先要揭露罪並為之責備,然後要應許那將除去世人罪惡者的降臨。這也是蒙福的聖靈在對付人的靈魂時所採取的方法(約 16:8)。他先剖開傷口,然後敷上醫治的良藥。神已藉著護理和典章(而且人會以為是有效地)為以色列人作了安排,使他們歸向自己;但從此處對他們的控訴看來,他們在這兩方面都徒然領受了神的恩典。I. 他們對神向他們的恩惠極不知恩,沒有按所領受的恩惠報答(瑪 1:1-5)。II. 他們在遵守神的制度上非常疏忽懈怠;祭司尤其如此,他們被特別委以這些職責(瑪 1:6-14)。對於那些既不受護理感動、又不受典章影響,並在那些本當榮耀神的事上冒犯神的人,我們還能說什麼呢?

英文原文

Thus prophet is sent first to convince and then to comfort, first to discover sin and to reprove for that and then to promise the coming of him who shall take away sin. And this method the blessed Spirit takes in dealing with souls, Joh 16:8. He first opens the wound and then applies the healing balm. God had provided (and one would think effectually) for the engaging of Israel to himself by providences and ordinances; but it seems, by the complaints here made of them, that they received the grace of God in both these in vain. I. They were very ungrateful to God for his favours to them, and rendered not again according to the benefit they received, Mal 1:1-5. II. They were very careless and remiss in the observance of his institutions; the priests especially were so, who were in a particular manner charged with them, Mal 1:6-14. And what shall we say of those whom neither providences nor ordinances work upon, and who affront God in those very things wherein they should honour him?

1-5

Ingratitude of Israel; Judgments and Mercies (400 BC)

開啟正文

以色列的不感恩;審判與憐憫(主前400年)

¹ 耶和華藉瑪拉基傳給以色列的默示。
² 耶和華說:「我曾愛你們。」你們卻說:「你在何事上愛我們呢?」耶和華說:「以掃不是雅各的哥哥嗎?我卻愛雅各,
³ 惡以掃,使他的山嶺荒涼,把他的地業交給曠野的野狗。」
⁴ 以東人說:「我們現在雖被毀壞,卻要重建荒廢之處。」萬軍之耶和華如此說:「任他們建造,我必拆毀;人必稱他們的地為『罪惡之境』;又稱他們的民為『耶和華永遠惱怒之民』。」
⁵ 你們必親眼看見,也必說:「願耶和華在以色列境界之外被尊為大!」

本書的預言被稱為耶和華話語的默示(瑪 1:1),這暗示了:1. 這預言有極大的分量和重要性;假先知所說的輕如糠秕,真先知所說的重如麥子(耶 23:38)。2. 這話當常常向他們複述、也當由他們複述,如同歌曲的主旋律。3. 對有些人來說,這話成了重擔和羞辱;他們厭煩它,覺得被它壓得喘不過氣來,無法忍受。4. 對他們而言,這話實在會成為重擔,將他們沉到最深的陰間——除非他們悔改。5. 對那些喜愛它、接受它、歡迎它的人來說,它雖是輕省的擔子——正如我們的救主所稱(太 11:30)——卻仍是一個擔子。

這耶和華話語的默示被差遣,1. 臨到以色列,因為無論是活潑的先知預言還是成文的聖言,都是屬於他們的。神已差遣了許多先知到以色列,如今他要再試他們一次。2. 藉瑪拉基——藉瑪拉基的手傳遞——彷彿不是口傳的信息,而是交在他手中的一封信,為要更加確實。

在這幾節中,他們被指控不感恩——因為他們沒有適當地體會神對他們格外的恩惠;這樣的指控實可稱為默示,因為它是沉重的。

I. 神宣告他曾對他們懷有並常常表明的大慈愛(瑪 1:2):*「我曾愛你們,這是耶和華說的。」*信息如此突然地開始,彷彿神無論要給他們什麼責備,都要使他們與他的愛和好,並確保他們仍對他有好的想法。*我所愛的,我就責備管教。信息如此親切地開始。神要他的百姓確信他愛他們,並永遠記念他的愛。這與他從前對以色列處女所說的話相同,為要吸引她的心歸向自己(耶 31:3-4):我以永遠的愛愛了你。在這一個詞中,神總結了他一切恩典的對待;愛是萬有的源頭;他愛他們,因為他定意愛他們(申 7:7-8),在他們幼年時就愛了他們(何 11:1)。他的喜悅在他們身上(賽 62:4)。「我曾愛你們,你們卻沒有愛我,也沒有為我的愛作出適當的回報。」*請注意,神的百姓需要常常被提醒神對他們的愛。

II. 他們質疑他的愛,貶低他愛的證據,似乎還因他告訴他們而與他爭吵:你們卻說:「你在何事上愛我們呢?」神將他一切對他們的恩惠追溯到源頭——他的愛,照樣他也將他們一切得罪他的罪追溯到源頭——他們對他的愛的輕視。他們不但不承認他的恩惠、思想當如何回報,反而恥於承認自己受過他的恩,挑戰他拿出實質的愛的證明,並對他們已得的恩惠的證據輕看輕說,以為那些證據既少又小,不值一提,也不過是他們已充分回報的,或至少是他已用他怒氣的例子充分抵消的。「我們豈不是被毀壞、貧窮、被擄嗎?那你又在何事上愛了我們呢?」請注意,神的恩惠被人輕看——以為不值一提——神公正地視之為大惡;我們若問他在何事上愛了我們,這是何等荒謬,因為我們無論朝哪個方向看,都遇見他愛我們的證據和實例。

III. 他證明,無可辯駁地,他確實愛了他們,是以分別的方式愛了他們,這格外令人感動。為此他展示了他已在雅各和以掃之間——以色列人和以東人之間——所作、並將繼續作的區別。有人這樣讀他們的問題:你為何愛了我們?彷彿他們確實承認他愛了他們,卻又暗示其中有一個原因——他愛他們是因為他們的祖宗亞伯拉罕愛了他,因此那不是白白的愛,而是欠債的愛。他回答說:「以掃豈不和亞伯拉罕一樣親近嗎?他豈不是雅各的親哥哥,他的長兄嗎?因此,若亞伯拉罕的愛當得回報,以掃也有權利,然而我卻惡以掃,愛了雅各。」

1. 讓他們看見神在雅各和以掃之間作了何等區別。以掃是雅各的兄弟,他的孿生兄弟:「然而我愛雅各,惡以掃」——就是說,接納雅各進入約中,將福氣賜給他和他的後裔,卻拒絕並棄絕了以掃。請注意,那些被接納與神立約、得著活潑的聖言和恩典的途徑的人,有理由將這些視為他愛的憑據。雅各被愛,因為他有這些;以掃被惡,因為他沒有。使徒引用了這話(羅 9:13),並將它與神對利百加論到她雙子的啟示相比較(創 25:23):*將來大的要服事小的,以說明神在施恩上的主權教義;因為他不能隨己意對待自己的所有嗎?*以掃被惡是公義的,但雅各被愛卻是白白的恩典;即使是這樣,父啊,*因為你的美意本是如此,*我們也不當問為何或緣故。

2. 讓他們看見他如今正在做、並將要做的事,以成就這起初的區別。

(1)以東人將成為神公義的紀念碑,他要在以東徹底的毀滅中得榮耀:因為我惡以掃;我使他的山嶺荒涼——西珥的山,那是他的產業。當那片地區全被迦勒底軍隊蹂躪時,以東的國土也隨之被毀,成為曠野野狗的住處,如此完全荒涼;正如先前所預言的(賽 34:6、11)。以東人曾因耶路撒冷的傾覆而歡喜(詩 137:7),因此神將同樣戰兢的杯遞到他們手中是公義的。而且,以東的廢墟雖然來得最遲,卻最為持久,荒涼是永遠的;正是在這一點上,雅各和以掃之間的區別被劃定,義人和惡人之間的區別也被劃定——否則凡事都一樣臨到兩者,似乎只有一個結局。雅各的城邑雖被毀壞,卻要重建;以東的城邑被毀壞,卻永不重建。義人的受苦將有終結,並且終結得美滿;他們一切的冤屈將被糾正,憂愁變為喜樂;但惡人的受苦卻是無盡的、無藥可救的,正如以東的荒涼(瑪 1:4)。請注意此處:[1.] 以東人虛妄的盼望,以為他們的廢墟將如以色列一樣被修復,儘管他們沒有應許可以作為盼望的根基。他們說:「誠然,我們被毀壞了;這是常見的遭遇,無可補救;但我們要歸回,重建荒廢之處;我們定意要如此行」(甚至不求神的許可);「我們要」——不管他願不願意;不,我們要違背神的咒詛而行,違背那對以東所宣布的判決(賽 34:10):*世世代代永遠荒涼。*他們妄自尊大地建造,如同希伊勒違背神的話建造耶利哥(王上 16:34),結果也必照樣速速敗亡。請注意,那些在令人謙卑的護理之下心未謙卑的人,常想靠自己頂住神自己,重新建造、栽種、繁盛如舊,儘管神已說過他們必被毀壞。但請看,[2.] 這些盼望的破滅:他們說,我們要建造;但萬軍之耶和華怎麼說呢?因為我們確知他的話必立定,而他們的話不能立。他說:第一,他們的嘗試必被挫敗:他們要建造,我卻要拆毀。請注意,那些與神背道而行的人,必發現神也與他們背道而行;因為誰向神硬著心而興盛呢?當猶太人棄絕了基督和他的福音之後,他們就成了以東人,這話也應驗在他們身上;因為當哈德良皇帝年間,他們企圖重建耶路撒冷時,神藉地震和火的噴發推倒了他們所建造的,以致他們被迫放棄這工程。第二,他們必被眾人視為已被交給徹底的毀滅。所有看見他們的人都必稱他們為罪惡之境——一個有罪的國家,且是無可救藥的,因此是耶和華永遠惱怒之民。既然他們的邪惡永不改正,他們的荒涼也永不修復。神對以色列只是稍微惱怒(亞 1:15),但對以東卻懷怒,而且永遠懷怒,因為他們是他咒詛的民(賽 34:5)。

(2)以色列人將成為他憐憫的紀念碑,他要在以色列的拯救中得榮耀(瑪 1:5)。「以東人要被標記為神所惡的民;但你們的眼睛要看見,你們對他愛你們的疑慮永遠被平息;因為你們要說,也有理由說:耶和華在以色列的境界之上被尊為大——從以色列地的每一部分和邊界都被尊為大。」以東的境界是罪惡之境,因此耶和華要永遠向它發怒;但以色列的境界是聖潔之境,是聖所的境界(詩 78:54),因此神要使它顯明(雖然它可能暫時荒涼):他為它存留了憐憫,他也要因此被尊為大;他要賜給他的百姓以色列理由和心來讚美他。當以東的境界仍然荒涼,而以色列的境界被修復和充滿時,就顯明神愛了雅各。請注意,[1.] 那些懷疑神對他百姓之愛的人,遲早必有令人信服且無可否認的證據賜給他們:你們自己的眼睛要看見你們現在不信的事。[2.] 從患難中蒙拯救當被視為神對他百姓善意的證據,儘管他們可能被允許陷入患難(詩 34:19)。[3.] 分別的恩惠極令人感動。神若重建以色列的境界,卻任以東的境界荒涼,那麼任何以色列人都不可羞恥地問:你在何事上愛了我們呢?[4.] 高舉以色列就是尊大以色列的神;神也必這樣或那樣地從他自稱的百姓中得著榮耀。[5.] 神的良善既是他的榮耀,當他恩待我們時,我們當宣揚他的偉大,因為那就是尊大他。他以*他的僕人繁盛為樂,*是他的良善的明證;為此,那些愛慕他救恩的人說:願耶和華被尊為大(詩 35:27)。

英文原文

Ingratitude of Israel; Judgments and Mercies (400 BC)

¹ The burden of the word of the LORD to Israel by Malachi.
² I have loved you, saith the LORD. Yet ye say, Wherein hast thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob's brother? saith the LORD: yet I loved Jacob,
³ And I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness.
⁴ Whereas Edom saith, We are impoverished, but we will return and build the desolate places; thus saith the LORD of hosts, They shall build, but I will throw down; and they shall call them, The border of wickedness, and, The people against whom the LORD hath indignation for ever.
⁵ And your eyes shall see, and ye shall say, The LORD will be magnified from the border of Israel.

The prophecy of this book is entitled, The burden of the word of the Lord (Mal 1:1), which intimates, 1. That it was of great weight and importance; what the false prophets said was light as the chaff, what the true prophets said was ponderous as the wheat, Jer 23:38. 2. That it ought to be often repeated to them and by them, as the burden of a song. 3. That there were those to whom it was a burden and a reproach; they were weary of it, and found themselves so aggrieved by it that they were not able to bear it. 4. That to them it would prove a burden indeed, to sink them to the lowest hell, unless they repented. 5. That to those who loved it and embraced it, and bade it welcome, though it was a light burden, as our Saviour calls it (Mt 11:30), yet it was a burden.

This burden of the word of the Lord was sent, 1. To Israel, for to them pertained the lively oracles of prophecy as well as those of the written word. Many prophets God had sent to Israel, and now he will try them with one more. 2. By Malachi, by the hand of Malachi, as if it were not a message by word of mouth, but a letter put into his hand, for the greater certainty.

In these verses, they are charged with ingratitude, in that they were not duly sensible of God's distinguishing goodness to them; and such a charge as this may well be called a burden, for it is a heavy one.

I. God asserts the great kindness he had, and had often expressed, for them (Mal 1:2): I have loved you, saith the Lord. Thus abruptly does the sermon begin, as if God intended, whatever reproofs should be given them, to reconcile them to his love, and to take care that they should still have good thoughts of him. As many as I love I rebuke and chasten. Thus kindly does the sermon begin. God will have his people satisfied that he loves them and is ever mindful of his love. This is the same with what he said of old to the virgin of Israel, that he might engage her affections to himself (Jer 31:3,4): Yea I have loved thee with an everlasting love. In this one word God sums up all his gracious dealings with them; love was the spring of all; he loved them because he would love them (De 7:7,8), loved them in their childhood, Ho 11:1. His delight was in them, Isa 62:4. "I have loved you, but you have not loved me, nor made any suitable returns for my love." Note, God's people need to be often reminded of his love to them.

II. They question his love, and diminish the instances of it, and seem to quarrel with him for telling them of it: Yet you say, Wherein hast thou loved us? As God traces up all his favours to them to the fountain, which was his love, so he traces up all their sins against him to the fountain, which was their contempt of his love. Instead of acknowledging his kindness, and studying what they shall render, they scorn to own that they have been beholden to him, challenge him to produce proofs of his love that are material, and think and speak very slightly of the instances they have had of his kindness, as if they were so few, so small, as not to be worth taking notice of, and no more than what they had sufficiently made returns for, or at least than he had sufficiently balanced with instances of his wrath. "Have we not been wasted, impoverished, and carried captive; and wherein then hast thou loved us?" Note, God justly takes it very ill to have his favours slighted, as not worth speaking of; and it is very absurd for us to ask wherein he has loved us, when, which way soever we look, we meet with the proofs and instances of his love to us.

III. He makes it out, beyond contradiction, that he has loved them, loved them in a distinguishing way, which was in a special manner obliging. For proof of this he shows the difference he had made, and would still make, between Jacob and Esau, between Israelites and Edomites. Some read their question, Wherefore hast thou loved us? as if they did indeed own that he had loved them, but withal insinuate that there was a reason for it—that he loved them because their father Abraham had loved him, so that it was not a free love, but a love of debt, to which he replies, "Was not Esau as near akin to Abraham as you are? Was he not Jacob's own brother, his elder brother? And therefore, if there were any right to a recompence for Abraham's love, Esau had it, and yet I hated Esau and loved Jacob."

1. Let them see what a difference God had made between Jacob and Esau. Esau was Jacob's brother, his twin-brother: "Yet I loved Jacob and I hated Esau, that is, took Jacob into covenant, and entailed the blessing on him and his, but refused and rejected Esau." Note, Those that are taken into covenant with God, that have the lively oracles and the means of grace committed to them, have reason to look upon these as tokens of his love. Jacob is loved, for he has these, Esau hated, for he has not. The apostle quotes this (Ro 9:13), and compares it with what the oracle said to Rebecca concerning her twins (Ge 25:23), The elder shall serve the younger, to illustrate the doctrine of God's sovereignty in dispensing his favours; for may he not do what he will with his own? Esau was justly hated, but Jacob freely loved; even so, Father, because it seemed good in thy eyes, and it is not for us to ask why or wherefore.

2. Let them see what he was now doing and would do with them, pursuant to this original difference.

(1.) The Edomites shall be made the monuments of God's justice, and he will be glorified in their utter destruction: For Esau have I hated; I laid his mountains waste, the mountains of Seir, which were his heritage. When all that part of the world was ravaged by the Chaldean army the country of Edom was, among the rest, laid in ruins, and became a habitation for the dragons of the wilderness, so perfectly desolate was it; as was foretold, Isa 34:6,11. The Edomites had triumphed in Jerusalem's overthrow (Ps 137:7), and therefore it was just with God to put the same cup of trembling into their hands. And, though Edom's ruins were last, yet they were lasting, and the desolation perpetual; and in this the difference was made between Jacob and Esau, and is made between the righteous and the wicked, to whom otherwise all things come alike, and there seems to be one event. Jacob's cities are laid waste, but they are rebuilt; Edom's are laid waste, and never rebuilt. The sufferings of the righteous will have an end and will end well; all their grievances will be redressed, and their sorrow turned into joy; but the sufferings of the wicked will be endless and remediless, as Edom's desolations, Mal 1:4. Observe here, [1.] The vain hopes of the Edomites, that they shall have their ruins repaired as well as Israel, though they had no promise to build their hope upon. They say, "It is true, we are impoverished; it is the common chance, and there is no remedy; but we will return and build the desolate places; we are resolved we will" (not so much as asking God leave); "we will whether he will or no; nay, we will do it in defiance of God's curse, and that sentence pronounced upon Edom (Isa 34:10), From generation to generation it shall lie waste." They build presumptuously, as Hiel built Jericho in direct contradiction to the word of God (1Ki 16:34), and it shall speed accordingly. Note, It is common for those whose hearts are unhumbled under humbling providences to think to make their part good against God himself, and to build, and plant, and flourish again as much as ever, though God has said that they shall be impoverished. But see, [2.] The dashing of these hopes and the disappointment of them: They say, We will build; but what says the Lord of hosts? For we are sure his word shall stand, and not theirs; and he says, First, Their attempts shall be baffled: They shall build, but I will throw down. Note, Those that walk contrary to God will find that he will walk contrary to them; for who ever hardened his heart against God and prospered? When the Jews had rejected Christ and his gospel they became Edomites, and this word was fulfilled in them; for when, in the time of the emperor Adrian, they attempted to rebuild Jerusalem, God by earthquakes and eruptions of fire threw down what they built, so that they were forced to quit the enterprise. Secondly, They shall be looked upon by all as abandoned to utter ruin. All that see them shall call them the border of wickedness, a sinful nation, incurably so, and therefore the people against whom the Lord has indignation for ever. Since their wickedness is such as will never be reformed, their desolations shall be such as are never to be repaired. Against Israel God was a little displeased (Zec 1:15), but against Edom he has indignation, and will have for ever, for they are the people of his curse, Isa 34:5.

(2.) The Israelites shall be made the monuments of his mercy, and he will be glorified in their salvation, Mal 1:5. "The Edomites shall be stigmatized as a people hated of God, but your eyes shall see your doubts concerning his love to you for ever silenced; for you shall say, and have cause to say, The Lord is and will be magnified from the border of Israel, from every part and border of the land of Israel." The border of Edom is a border of wickedness, and therefore the Lord will have indignation against it for ever; but the border of Israel is a border of holiness, the border of the sanctuary (Ps 78:54), and therefore God will make it to appear (though it may for a time lie desolate) that he has mercy in store for it, and thence he will be magnified; he will give his people Israel both cause, and hearts, to praise him. When the border of Edom still remains desolate, and the border of Israel is repaired and replenished, then it will appear that God has loved Jacob. Note, [1.] Those who doubt of God's love to his people shall, sooner or later, have convincing and undeniable proofs given them of it: "your own eyes shall see what you will not believe." [2.] Deliverances out of trouble are to be reckoned proofs of God's good-will to his people, though they may be suffered to fall into trouble, Ps 34:19. [3.] Distinguishing favours are very obliging. If God rear up again the border of Israel, but leave the border of Edom in ruins, let no Israelite ask, for shame, Wherein hast thou loved us? [4.] The dignifying of Israel is the magnifying of the God of Israel, and, one way or other, God will have honour from his professing people. [5.] God's goodness being his glory, when he does us good we must proclaim him great, for that is magnifying him. It is an instance of his goodness that he has pleasure in the prosperity of his servants, and for this those that love his salvation say, The Lord be magnified, Ps 35:27.

6-14

God's Remonstrance with the Priests; Judgment of Wicked Priests (400 BC)

開啟正文

神對祭司的抗辯;惡祭司的審判(主前400年)

⁶ 藐視我名的祭司啊,萬軍之耶和華對你們說:兒子尊敬父親,僕人敬畏主人;我既為父親,尊敬我的在哪裏呢?我既為主人,敬畏我的在哪裏呢?你們卻說:我們在何事上藐視你的名呢?
⁷ 你們將污穢的食物獻在我的壇上,且說:我們在何事上污穢你呢?因你們說,耶和華的桌子是可藐視的。
⁸ 你們將瞎眼的獻為祭物,這不為惡嗎?將瘸腿的、有病的獻為祭物,這不為惡嗎?你獻給你的省長吧,他豈會悅納你,豈會看你的情面嗎?這是萬軍之耶和華說的。
⁹ 現在我勸你們懇求神,他好施恩與我們。這妄獻的事,既由你們經手,他豈能看你們的情面嗎?這是萬軍之耶和華說的。
¹⁰ 甚願你們中間有一人關上門,免得你們徒然在我壇上点火。萬軍之耶和華說:我不喜悅你們,也不從你們手中收納供物。
¹¹ 萬軍之耶和華說:從日出之地到日落之處,我的名在外邦中必尊為大;在各處,人必奉我的名燒香,獻潔淨的供物,因為我的名在外邦中必尊為大。
¹² 你們卻褻瀆了它,因你們說:耶和華的桌子是污穢的,其上的食物是可藐視的。
¹³ 你們又說:看哪,何等煩瑣!你們對此嗤之以鼻。這是萬軍之耶和華說的。你們把搶奪的、瘸腿的、有病的拿來獻上為祭,我豈能從你們手中收納呢?這是耶和華說的。
¹⁴ 行詭詐的在群中有公羊,他許願卻用有殘疾的獻給主,這人是可咒詛的;因為我是大君王,我的名在外邦中是可畏的。這是萬軍之耶和華說的。

先知在此奉特別的使命追究祭司的責任——雖然他們自己被任命為審判官,要追究百姓的責任。讓神家中作治理的知道,在他們之上還有一位,要因他們治理的不當而與他們算賬。如此萬軍之耶和華對你們說——你們這些祭司!(瑪 1:6)。神要向不忠心的傳道人說話;那些奉神之名向他百姓說話的人,當留意聽他對他們所說的話,使他們可以首先救自己——否則他們怎能幫助拯救那些聽他們的人呢?此處對祭司因褻瀆他們受託的神聖之物而發的嚴厲——無疑也是公義——的責備;若這是祭司的罪,我們也有理由擔心百姓也同樣有罪:所以對祭司所說的話就是對所有人說的——不,是對我們說的——我們這些作基督徒的,不但自稱為神的百姓,更自稱為他的祭司。請注意此處,

I. 神期望從他們得到的是什麼,以及他為何有充分理由如此期望(瑪 1:6):兒子尊敬父親——因為他是他的父親;自然在兒女心中寫下了這條律法,早於神在西奈山上頒布它;不但如此,僕人——雖然他對主人的責任不是天然的,而是出於自願的契約——也認為尊敬主人、留意主人的吩咐、對主人的利益忠心是他的本分。兒女和僕人都尊敬父母和主人;人人若非如此,就都指責他們為恥,他們自己的良心也不能不責備他們;家庭的秩序如此得以維持,這也是家庭的美和益處。但祭司——他們既是神的兒女,又是他的僕人——卻不敬畏和尊敬他。他們對百姓是父親和主人,也期望被稱為父親和主人(士 18:19;太 22:7、10),並因此受到尊敬和順服;但他們忘記了他們在天上的父和主人,以及他們對他所欠的本分。我們每個人都可以將此處加在祭司身上的指控加在自己身上。請注意:1. 我們每個人都當視神為我們的父和主人,視自己為他的兒女和僕人。2. 我們與神作我們的父和主人的關係有力地約束我們敬畏和尊敬他。我們若尊敬和敬畏我們肉身的父,就更當尊敬和敬畏我們靈魂的父和主人(來 12:9)。3. 神如此少受人敬畏和尊敬——甚至那些承認他為他們的父和主人的人也是如此——這是正當可抱怨和令人痛心的事。尊敬我的在哪裏?敬畏我的在哪裏?

II. 祭司對神所表現的輕慢是什麼。

1. 這是一般性的指控:(1)他們藐視神的名;他們作為祭司對其太熟悉,反而生出了輕視之心——只利用它來為自己和自己的人博取尊敬,而神的名在他們看來不值一提。神的名就是他藉以彰顯自己的一切——他的話語和典章;他們對這些存著輕視的想法,貶損了那些他們本當高舉的事物;難怪他們既自己輕視它,就做了使它在別人眼中也顯得可鄙的事——如同以利的兒子使耶和華的祭物被藐視一樣。(2)他們褻瀆神的名(瑪 1:12)。他們污穢了它(瑪 1:7)。他們不但不看重聖物,反而濫用它們,將其曲解到最壞和最卑劣的目的上——自己的驕傲、貪婪和放縱。再沒有什麼比褻瀆神的名更惹動神怒氣的了;因為他的名是聖潔可畏的。他的純潔不能被我們污穢,因為他是無瑕無疵的;但他的名可以被褻瀆;而沒有什麼比祭司的不當行為更褻瀆它了——祭司的本分正是要尊大他的名。這是一般性的指控。他們對此辯稱無罪,並挑戰神在他們身上證明,使指控成立——這在膽大包天的不敬虔上又加上了膽大包天的無恥:你們說:我們在何事上藐視你的名呢?(瑪 1:6),我們在何事上污穢你呢?(瑪 1:7)。驕傲的罪人受責備時如此堅持為自己辯護是常見的。這些祭司極其可憎地褻瀆了聖物,卻像淫婦一樣說自己沒有做惡事;他們如此不注意自己,以至於不記念也不反思自己的行為;或者他們對神的律法如此無知,以為自己所做的沒有什麼不對,不能被理解為藐視神的名;或者他們如此無神論,以為雖然知道自己的罪,神卻不知道;或者他們對神和他的先知如此傲慢,以致以嘲弄嚴肅公正的責備、以戲言將之推搪為傲。他們要麼嘲笑責備——如同那些藐視它、向它硬著心的人;要麼以笑推搪——如同那些決心不受它觸動、或不願顯得受觸動的人。無論我們如何理解,他們的辯護就是他們的罪,在為自己辯護時,他們自己的舌頭就定了他們的罪,他們說我們在何事上藐視你的名呢?反而證明了他們驕傲和頑梗。他們若帶著謙卑、渴望更確切地被告知在哪裏得罪了而問這問題,那就是他們悔改的證據,並可給人帶來他們歸正的希望;但如此帶著對神話語的輕蔑和挑戰問這問題,卻表明他們的心已定意行惡。請注意,罪人因設法推卻自己的知罪之感而毀滅自己;但他們必發現用腳踢刺是難的。

2. 照著一般性的指控,他們本可公正地被定罪,他們的辯護也可被作為無謂之辭駁回;但神不但要勝過他們,更要顯明自己是清楚的——在他審判時要被稱為義;所以他非常具體地向他們指出他們在何事上藐視了他的名,以及他們對他所加的輕慢是什麼。如同先前他指控他們拜偶像時所做的一樣,如今他指控他們褻瀆時,也吩咐他們看自己在谷中的道路,知道所做的(耶 2:23)。

(1)他們在言語上藐視神的名——在他們對他典章所存的輕視看法中:「你們在心裏說——也許在你們祭司聚在一起喝酒、百姓聽不到時說出來——『耶和華的桌子是可藐視的。』」(瑪 1:7),又說(瑪 1:12):*「你們說:『耶和華的桌子是污穢的。』它不必比任何別的桌子更受尊重。」*這桌子要麼是指殿中放置陳設餅的桌子(他們因不明白其中的奧秘,就輕視它為無關緊要之物);或者更確切地說,燔祭壇在此被稱為桌子,因為在那裏神和他的祭司和他的百姓如同一同坐席——分享祭物,作為友誼的記號。他們認為這是可鄙的。從前在迷信的日子裏,它被認為與外邦人所立的偶像祭壇相比是可鄙的,被擱置一旁以騰出空間給一個新式的祭壇(王下 16:14-15);如今它被認為與他們自己的桌子以及他們偉人的桌子相比是可鄙的:其上的果子——就是其上的食物——是可藐視的。那些在壇前服事的人本當靠壇生活;但他們抱怨說他們生活貧窮卑微,為壇的果子和食物服事壇不值得,因為那些東西非常普通,而且總是一成不變;他們沒有 delicacies(美味),沒有 variety(花樣),沒有 nice dishes(精緻的菜餚)。不但如此,他們帶著輕視看待獻給神的那部分祭物——血和脂油——認為不配神為此制定那麼多律法;他們問:「何必為燒脂油和倒血如此大費周章?」請注意,那些輕視信仰的事工——雖然它極其尊榮——以為不值得在其中勞苦,又輕視信仰的益處——雖然它們極有價值——以為不值得為之勞苦的人,大大褻瀆和污穢了神的名。那些漫不經心地忽視聖潔典章、前來時不存敬畏、離開時毫無長進也毫無關切的人,實際上是在說:「耶和華的桌子是可藐視的;其中既無美德也無價值,既不能帶來榮譽也不能帶來安慰。」

(2)他們在行為上藐視神的名——這與他們所說的一致,且是由此而來的;敗壞的原則和觀念是苦根,結出敗壞行為的苦膽和茵陳。他們既看耶和華的桌子和祭壇為可鄙,[1.] 他們就以為任何東西都足以作祭物——無論多麼粗糙低劣——他們不但不帶最好的來(如他們本當做的),反而挑出他們所有中最差的——既不適合市場也不適合自己餐桌的——獻在神的壇上。每一次獻祭他們當帶用油調的細麵素祭;但他們帶來污穢的食物(瑪 1:7)——粗糙的餅、僕人的餅,也許乾了發了霉,或是用麥子的廢料做的,他們以為燒在壇上已經夠好了;因為若是更好,他們就會說:為什麼這樣浪費呢?至於他們所獻的牲畜,雖然律法明確規定獻為祭的不可有瑕疵,他們卻帶瞎眼的、瘸腿的、有病的(瑪 1:8),又帶(瑪 1:13)搶奪的、瘸腿的、有病的——快要自己死的。他們只看到祭物被焚燒,就辯稱若它還有別的用處,燒了實在可惜。百姓在某種程度上確信自己的本分,所以肯帶祭物來;他們不敢全然忽略這本分,卻帶虛浮的供物,帶自己最差的來——如此嘲弄神、欺騙自己;而祭司——本當教導他們更好的——卻因怕他們若拒絕,百姓就根本不再帶來,他們就會失去自己的進項,所以接納了帶到壇上的禮物並在那裏獻上;因此他們更看重自己的利益而非神的榮耀,接納了他們明知神不會接納的。有人將瑪 1:8理解為祭司褻瀆話語的延續(瑪 1:7):你們對百姓說:你們若獻瞎眼的為祭物,這不算惡;或瘸腿的、有病的,這不算惡。請注意,將瞎眼的、瘸腿的、搶奪的、有病的獻給神為祭,無論人怎麼想,這是極惡的事。我們若無知地、沒有悟性地敬拜神,就是帶瞎眼的為祭物;我們若漫不經心地、沒有深思地做,若在其中冷漠、遲鈍、死氣沉沉,就是帶有病的為祭物;我們若只停留在外在的操練上而不用心靈去做,就是帶瘸腿的;若我們允許虛妄的意念和分心的事藏在我們裏面,就是帶搶奪的。這不是惡嗎?這豈不是對神的大大冒犯,又對我們自己的靈魂是大大的傷害嗎?我們的書不是告訴我們嗎?不,我們自己的心不是告訴我們嗎?這是惡嗎?因為神——那最好的——當以我們所有中最好的來服事。[2.] 他們不做超過所得報酬的工作。祭司肯獻帶到壇上的祭物,因為他們有自己的分;但至於聖殿的其他任何服事——沒有特別費用的——他們不肯動一根指頭、伸一隻手去幫忙;這是他們普遍的心態(瑪 1:10)。祭司中沒有一人肯白白地關門或點火。若要他做最小的一件服事,他就會問:我該得多少報酬?他們什麼也不肯白白地做,全在乎能得什麼——各人專顧自己,從自己的地方求自己的利益(賽 56:11)。請注意,雖然神已下令他的僕人當在今世得到優厚的報酬,但那些唯利是圖——若非為工價就絕不做工——的人,不是他所悅納的僕人。[3.] 他們的工作對他們來說完全是苦役(瑪 1:13):你們又說:看哪,何等煩瑣!祭司和百姓都是這樣的想法,以為神加給他們太重的擔子;百姓吝惜預備祭物的開支,祭司吝惜獻祭的勞苦;他們以為耶和華的節期來得太密,他們被迫太頻繁、太久地留在耶和華的院中;祭司以為要照要求潔淨自己才能在壇前服事並吃聖物,是一種嚴厲的苦修;他們以為自己職分的本分又累又煩,並對之嗤之以鼻——以為不合理、太苛刻;他們做了,卻是勉勉強強、心存抗拒地做。神在為他的律法辯護時說,他並沒有因祭物使他們服役,也沒有因香品使他們厭煩(賽 43:23)。我使你厭煩的是什麼呢?(彌 6:3)。但他們自己邪惡的心使它成為煩瑣;他們如同以東人那樣,被留在耶和華面前;他們寧可在任何別的地方。請注意,那些厭倦神的服事和敬拜、對之嗤之以鼻的人,對神和自己都是極大的不義。

III. 請看神如何與他們辯論、據理力爭,為要使他們知罪和自卑。1. 他們敢如此冒犯地上的君王嗎?「你們將瘸腿的和有病的獻給神;現在將它獻給你的省長吧(瑪 1:8)——或作貢物,或作禮物,當你求他恩惠,或為所得的恩惠感恩時;他會悅納你嗎?或更確切地說,他豈不視之為冒犯嗎?」請注意,那些在宗教敬拜的本分上漫不經心、不存敬畏的人,當想到將他們不肯獻給省長的東西獻給他們的神時,實在羞恥——他們更看重教養和禮節的規矩,過於信仰的規矩;更怕失禮,過於怕褻瀆。2. 他們能想像這樣的祭物會蒙神喜悅,或達到獻祭的目的嗎?「我豈能從你們手中收納它呢?這是耶和華說的」(瑪 1:13)。「你們有什麼理由認為我不能分辨或不察覺這冒犯——以為我會容忍對自己律法的違犯呢?不(瑪 1:10);我不喜悅你們,所以我不從你們手中收納這樣的供物。」神若不喜悅人——那人若不在稱義的狀態中,若不成聖——神就不收納供物。神先看中亞伯,然後看中他的供物。請注意,為了蒙神悅納,我們所做的在內容上是好的還不夠,我們更必須從正確的原則、以正確的方式、為正確的目的去做。那是從起初所定的規則(創 4:7):你若行得好,豈不蒙悅納?如今我們若不蒙神悅納,敬拜他就是徒然的;這全是徒勞;不,我們全完了——永遠完了——若我們達不到神的悅納。因此那些為了在信仰上省錢而錯失信仰一切目的的人,為自己做了壞交易;他們以為走捷徑,卻一事無成。那些以無論住在身內、離開身外,得主的喜悅為最高志向的人(我們都當如此),就不敢帶搶奪的、瘸腿的、有病的為祭物。3. 他們怎能期望在為百姓代求時在神面前有影響力,既然他們在獻祭中如此冒犯神?有人如此理解瑪 1:9,是帶著反諷說的:*「如今」你們若要盡祭司的本分,站在破口中,擋住你們看見即將傾覆我們的神的審判,「我勸你們懇求神,他好施恩與我們,」施恩給我們的地——幾乎被蝗蟲和毛蟲吃盡了的地(如瑪 3:11所見)。「如今試試你們在施恩寶座前有多少影響力;為除去這瘟疫而發揮吧,因為這是因你們的緣故;是你們惹動神差遣了它。但你們若如此繼續褻瀆他的聖物,他會看你們的情面或你們的禱告嗎?不,你們不能說服他將之收回。」因為我們若在心中注重罪孽,神必不聽我們——無論是為我們自己還是為別人。4. 神從他們手中受了這樣的待遇嗎?不,他豐富地供給了他們,又在他們的工作中給了他們鼓勵,這本可以促使他們愉快而好好地去做;有人如此理解瑪 1:10:「你們中間誰肯白白地關門或點火呢?不,神並不期望你們白白地服事他;你們得到了優厚的報酬,也必如此;為神的榮耀而給的一杯涼水,也必不失去賞賜。」*請注意,想到我們不斷從神領受的,以及在順服中得著的現今賞賜,就大大加重了我們在向神盡本分回報上的懶惰和吝嗇之罪。

IV. 他呼召他們為褻瀆他聖名而悔改。我們可如此理解瑪 1:9:「現在我勸你們懇求神,他好施恩與我們。為你們的罪自卑,向神大聲呼求赦免,並在你們禱告的信心和懇切上彌補你們祭物在價值上所缺的;因為我們所受的護理的一切責備都是因你們的緣故。*」*請注意,那些因自己的罪助長了點火的人,理當藉著自己的悔改、禱告和個人的歸正,助長滅火。我們當看見神的審判有多少是因我們的緣故,並因此受激勵,懇切求他在憐憫中轉回;我們若不採取這方法,怎能期望他看我們的情面呢?

V. 他宣告他決心既要保全自己名的榮耀,又要與那些褻瀆他名的人算賬。那些藐視神和信仰、想要貶低聖物的人,讓他們知道:

1. 他們不能達到目的。神要高舉他的律法使它尊大——雖然他們貶損它使它可鄙;因為(瑪 1:11)從日出之地到日落之處,我的名在外邦中必尊為大。人或許會說:「若這些不是神所要悅納的敬拜者,那他就沒有敬拜者了。」彷彿他必須將就他們的服事,否則就得不到任何服事;那麼他的大名怎麼辦呢?但這事交給他吧;雖然以色列不忠心,不被招聚,神仍要得榮耀。雖然這些祭司惹動他撤下禮儀制度,廢除那不能叫近前來的人得以完全的誡命之律,他最終卻不會因此吃虧;因為:(1)他們所褻瀆的屬肉體的條例,要被一個屬靈的敬拜方式所取代和確立:人必奉神的名燒香(指禱告和讚美[詩 141:2;啟 8:3]),取代公牛和山羊的血和脂油。而且那是潔淨的供物——經過煉淨的,不僅從祭司實踐中的敗壞中煉淨,更從那些條例本身僅有的外在操練中煉淨——那些條例被稱為屬肉體的條例,命定到振興的時候為止(來 9:10)。當真正拜父的用心靈和誠實拜他的時辰來到,這香就被獻上——就是這潔淨的供物。(2)他如今只在猶太人中間——世界一隅的一個小民——被敬拜和服事;他卻要在所有地方被服事和敬拜——*從日出之地到日落之處;在各處,在世界各處,人必奉他的名燒香;萬民要作門徒,述說神的奇事,又有人用他們自己的語言向他們說。這是對恩典國度中那場大革命的明確預言——藉著這革命,從前作客旅和外人的外邦人與聖徒同國,是神家裏的人了,*並且如猶太人從前一樣受歡迎來到施恩寶座前。這話說了兩次(因為這事是確定的):我的名在外邦中必尊為大;而從前只在猶大他才被認識,他的名才為大(詩 76:1)。神的名要向他們宣告,那宣告要被接受和相信;在外邦人中也要有那些比猶太人——甚至比祭司自己——更尊大和榮耀神名的人。

2. 他們不能免受懲罰(瑪 1:14)。這是那些如此行事之人的判決;對他們的判決就是對一切如此之人的判決。請注意:(1)對褻瀆和漫不經心的敬拜者的描述。他們是那些在自己群中有公羊,卻許願並將有殘疾的獻給主的人。他們有最好的來服事和尊榮他——他如此豐厚地賜予他們——卻以最差的打發他,以為對他已經夠好了——他們在回報上如此忘恩。這是百姓的錯,但祭司卻視而不見、放任他們如此行。我們發現律法中有一個區分:允許作為甘心祭獻的,卻不可作為許願的祭蒙悅納(利 22:23)。但祭司卻肯接納它——雖然神不肯——假裝比神更寬容;對此神日後不會感謝他們。(2)對這樣敬拜者的評語。他們是行詭詐的;他們對神行事虛假和詭詐;他們對他假冒為善;他們在許願時假裝尊敬他,但在履行時卻如此冒犯他,以致情願不許願強如許願而*如此償還;但這樣的人不要自欺,因為神是不可以被輕慢的。那些以為能欺騙神的人,到末了必發現自己欺騙了自己的靈魂,使靈魂沉淪。假冒為善者是欺騙人的,他們終必證明是自欺者——因此是自毀者。(3)加在他們身上的判決:他們是可咒詛的;他們期望祝福,卻要遇見咒詛——神怒氣的憑據,照著所寫的判決。(4)這判決的理由:「因為我是大君王,這是萬軍之耶和華說的,*所以我要與那些只把我當作與他們一樣的人算賬;*我的名在外邦中是可畏的,*所以我不容它在自己的百姓中被看為可鄙。」外邦人雖拜偶像,卻比猶太人——雖拜獨一又真又活的神——更尊敬他們的神。請注意,想到神普遍的統治和對它的普遍承認,應當約束我們在他服事上一切的不敬。

英文原文

God's Remonstrance with the Priests; Judgment of Wicked Priests (400 BC)

⁶ A son honoureth his father, and a servant his master: if then I be a father, where is mine honour? and if I be a master, where is my fear? saith the LORD of hosts unto you, O priests, that despise my name. And ye say, Wherein have we despised thy name?
⁷ Ye offer polluted bread upon mine altar; and ye say, Wherein have we polluted thee? In that ye say, The table of the LORD is contemptible.
⁸ And if ye offer the blind for sacrifice, is it not evil? and if ye offer the lame and sick, is it not evil? offer it now unto thy governor; will he be pleased with thee, or accept thy person? saith the LORD of hosts.
⁹ And now, I pray you, beseech God that he will be gracious unto us: this hath been by your means: will he regard your persons? saith the LORD of hosts.
¹⁰ Who is there even among you that would shut the doors for nought? neither do ye kindle fire on mine altar for nought. I have no pleasure in you, saith the LORD of hosts, neither will I accept an offering at your hand.
¹¹ For from the rising of the sun even unto the going down of the same my name shall be great among the Gentiles; and in every place incense shall be offered unto my name, and a pure offering: for my name shall be great among the heathen, saith the LORD of hosts.
¹² But ye have profaned it, in that ye say, The table of the LORD is polluted; and the fruit thereof, even his meat, is contemptible.
¹³ Ye said also, Behold, what a weariness is it! and ye have snuffed at it, saith the LORD of hosts; and ye brought that which was torn, and the lame, and the sick; thus ye brought an offering: should I accept this of your hand? saith the LORD.
¹⁴ But cursed be the deceiver, which hath in his flock a male, and voweth, and sacrificeth unto the Lord a corrupt thing: for I am a great King, saith the LORD of hosts, and my name is dreadful among the heathen.

The prophet is here, by a special commission, calling the priests to account, though they were themselves appointed judges, to call the people to an account. Let the rulers in the house of God know that there is one above them, who will reckon with them for their mal-administrations. Thus saith the Lord of hosts to you, O priests! Mal 1:6. God will have a saying to unfaithful ministers; and it concerns those who speak from God to his people to hear and heed what he says to them, that they may save themselves in the first place, otherwise how should they help to save those that hear them? It is a severe, and no doubt a just reproof, that is here given to the priests, for the profanation of the holy things of God, with which they were entrusted; and, if this was the crime of the priests, we have reason to fear the people also were guilty of it: so that what is said to the priests is said to all, nay, it is said to us, who, as Christians, profess ourselves, not only the people of God, but priests to him. Observe here,

I. What it was that God expected from them, and with what good reason he expected it (Mal 1:6): A son honours his father, because he is his father; nature has written this law in the hearts of children, before God wrote it at Mount Sinai; nay, a servant, though his obligation to his master is not natural, but by voluntary compact, yet thinks it his duty to honour him, to be observant of his orders, and true to his interests. Children and servants pay respect to their parents and masters; every one cries out shame on them if they do not, and their own hearts cannot but reproach them too; the order of families is thus kept up, and it is their beauty and advantage. But the priests, who are God's children and his servants, do not fear and honour him. They were fathers and masters to the people, and expected to be called so (Jdg 18:19, Mt 22:7,10) and to be reverenced and obeyed as such; but they forgot their Father and Master in heaven, and the duty they owed to him. We may each of us charge upon ourselves what is here charged upon the priests. Note, 1. We are every one of us to look upon God as our Father and Master, and upon ourselves as his children and servants. 2. Our relation to God as our Father and Master strongly obliges us to fear and honour him. If we honour and fear the fathers of our flesh, much more the Father and Master of our spirits, Heb 12:9. 3. It is a thing to be justly complained of, and lamented, that God is so little feared and honoured even by those that own him for their Father and Master. Where is his honour? Where is his fear?

II. What the contempt was which the priests put upon God.

1. This is that, in general, which is charged upon them:—(1.) They despised God's name; their familiarity with it, as priests, bred contempt of it, and served them only to gain a veneration by it for themselves and their own name, while God's name was of small account with them. God's name is all that whereby he has made himself known—his word and ordinances; these they had low thoughts of, and vilified that which it was their business to magnify; and no wonder that when they despised it themselves they did that which made it despicable to others, causing even the sacrifices of the Lord to be abhorred, as Eli's sons did. (2.) They profaned God's name, Mal 1:12. They polluted it, Mal 1:7. They not only made no account of sacred things, but they made an ill use of them, and perverted them to the service of the worst and vilest purposes—their own pride, covetousness, and luxury. There cannot be a greater provocation to God than the profanation of his name; for it is holy and reverend. His purity cannot be polluted by us, for he is unspotted, but his name may be profaned; and nothing profanes it more than the misconduct of priests, whose business it is to do honour to it. This is the general charge exhibited against them. To this they plead Not guilty, and challenge God to prove it upon them, and to make good the charge, which added daring impudence to their daring impiety: You say, Wherein have we despised thy name? (Mal 1:6), and wherein have we polluted thee? Mal 1:7. It is common with proud sinners, when they are reproved, to stand thus upon their own justification. These priests had most horridly profaned sacred things, and yet, like the adulterous woman, they said that they had done no wickedness; they were so inobservant of themselves that they remembered not or reflected not upon their own acts, or they were so ignorant of the divine law that they thought there was no harm in them, and that what they did could not be construed into despising God's name, or they were so atheistical as to imagine that though they knew their own guilt yet God did not, or they were so scornful in their conduct towards God and his prophets that they took a pride in bantering a serious and just reproof, and turning it off with a jest. They either laugh at the reproof, as those that despise it, and harden their hearts against it, or they laugh it off, as those that resolve they will not be touched by it, or will not seem to be so. Which way soever we take it, their defence was their offence, and, in justifying themselves, their own tongues condemned them, and their saying, Wherein have we despised thy name? proved them proud and perverse. Had they asked this question with a humble desire to be told more particularly where in they had offended, it would have been an evidence of their repentance, and would have given hopes of their reformation; but to ask it thus in disdain and defiance of the word of God argues their hearts fully set in them to do evil. Note, Sinners ruin themselves by studying to baffle their own convictions; but they will find it hard to kick against the pricks.

2. Justly might they have been convicted and condemned upon the general charge, and their plea thrown out as frivolous; but God will not only overcome, but will be clear, will be justified when he judges, and therefore he shows them very particularly wherein they had despised his name, and what the contempt was that they cast upon him. As formerly, when he charged them with idolatry, so now, when he charges them with profaneness, he bids them see their way in the valley and know what they have done, Jer 2:23.

(1.) They despised God's name in what they said, in the low opinion they had of his institutions: "You say in your hearts, and perhaps speak it out when you priests get together over your cups. out of the hearing of the people, The table of the Lord is contemptible" (Mal 1:7), and again (Mal 1:12), "You say, The table of the Lord is polluted; it is to be no more regarded than any other table." Either the table in the temple, on which the show-bread was placed, is that which they reflect upon (not understanding the mystery of it, they despised it as an insignificant thing), or rather the altar of burnt-offerings is here called the table, for there God, and his priests, and his people, did, as it were, feast together upon the sacrifices, in token of friendship. This they thought was contemptible. Formerly, in the days of superstition, it was thought contemptible in comparison with the idolatrous alters that the heathen had, and was set aside to make room for a new-fashioned one (2Ki 16:14,15); now it is thought contemptible in comparison with their own tables, and those of their great men: The fruit thereof, even his meat, is contemptible. Those who served at the altar were to live upon the altar; but they complained that they lived poorly and meanly, and that it was not worth while to attend the service of the altar for the fruit and meat of it, for it was very ordinary and always the same again; they had no dainties, no varieties, no nice dishes. Nay, that part of the sacrifices which was given to God, the blood and the fat, they looked upon with contempt, as not worthy the multitude of laws God had made about it; they asked, "What need is there of so much ado about burning the fat and pouring out the blood?" Note, Those greatly profane and pollute God's name who despise the business of religion, though it is very honourable, as not worth taking pains in, and the advantages of religion, though highly valuable, as not worth taking pains for. Those who live in a careless neglect of holy ordinances, who come to them and attend on them irreverently, and go away from them never the better and under no concern, do in effect say, "The table of the Lord is contemptible; there is neither virtue nor value in it, neither credit nor comfort from it."

(2.) They despised God's name in what they did, which was of a piece with what they said, and flowed from it; corrupt principles and notions are roots of bitterness, which bear the gall and wormwood of corrupt practices. They looked upon the table and altar of the Lord as contemptible, and then, [1.] They thought any thing would serve for a sacrifice, though ever so coarse and mean, and were so far from bringing the best, as they ought to have done, that they picked out the worst they had, which was fit neither for the market nor for their own tables, and offered that at God's altar. With every sacrifice they were to bring a meat-offering of fine flour mingled with oil; but they brought polluted bread (Mal 1:7), coarse bread, servants' bread, perhaps it was dry and mouldy, or made of the refuse of the wheat, which they thought good enough to be burnt upon the altar; for had it been better they would have said, To what purpose is this waste? And as to the beasts they offered, though the law was express that what was offered in sacrifice should not have a blemish, yet they brought the blind, and the lame, and the sick (Mal 1:8), and again (Mal 1:13), the torn, and the lame, and the sick, that was ready to die of itself. They looked no further than the burning of the sacrifice, and they pleaded that it was a pity to burn it if it was good for any thing else. The people were so far convinced of their duty that they would bring sacrifices; they durst not wholly omit the duty, but they brought vain oblations, mocked God, and deceived themselves, by bringing the worst they had; and the priests, who should have taught them better, accepted the gifts brought to the altar and offered them up there, because, if they should refuse them, the people would bring none at all, and then they would lose their perquisites; and therefore, having more regard to their own profit than to God's honour, they accepted that which they knew he would not accept. Some make Mal 1:8 to be a continuation of what the priests profanely said Mal 1:7, You say to the people, If you offer the blind for sacrifice, it is not evil; or the lame and the sick, it is not evil. Note, It is a very evil thing, whether men think so or no, to offer the blind and the lame, the torn and the sick, in sacrifice to God. If we worship God ignorantly, and without understanding, we bring the blind for sacrifice; if we do it carelessly, and without consideration, if we are cold, and dull, and dead, in it, we bring the sick; if we rest in the bodily exercise, and do not make heart-work of it, we bring the lame; and, if we suffer vain thoughts and distractions to lodge within us, we bring the torn. And is not this evil? Is it not a great affront to God and a great wrong and injury to our own souls? Do not our books tell us, nay, do not our own hearts tell us, that this is evil? for God, who is the best, ought to be served with the best we have. [2.] They would do no more of their work than what they were paid for. The priests would offer the sacrifices that were brought to the altar, because they had their share of them; but as for any other service of the temple, that had not a particular fee belonging to it, they would not stir a step, nor lend a hand, to it; and this was the general temper of them, Mal 1:10. There is not a man among the priests that would shut the doors, or kindle a fire, for nought. If he were required to do the smallest piece of service, he would ask, how shall I be paid for it? They would do nothing gratis, but were all for what they could get, every one for his gain, from his quarter, Isa 56:11. Note, Though God has given order that his servants be well paid in this world, yet those are no acceptable servants to him who are mercenary, and would never do the work but for the wages. [3.] Their work was a perfect drudgery to them (Mal 1:13): You said also, Behold, what a weariness is it! Both priests and people were of this mind, that they thought God imposed too hard a task upon them; the people grudged the charge of providing the sacrifice and the priests grudged the pains of offering it; they thought the feasts of the Lord came too thick, and they were forced to attend too often, and too long, in the courts of the Lord; the priests thought it a severe penance imposed upon them to purify themselves as was required when they attended the altar and ate of the holy things; they thought the duty of their office toilsome and troublesome, and snuffed at it as unreasonable, and bearing hard upon them; they did it, but it was grudgingly and with reluctance. God speaks of it, in justification of his law, that he had not made them to serve with an offering, nor wearied them with incense, Isa 43:23. Wherein have I wearied thee? Mic 6:3. But their own wicked hearts made it a weariness; and they were, as Doeg, detained before the Lord; they would rather have been any where else. Note, Those are highly injurious, both to God and themselves, who are weary of his service and worship, and snuff at it.

III. Observe how God expostulates and reasons the case with them, for their conviction and humiliation. 1. Would they, durst they, affront an earthly prince thus? "You offer to God the lame and the sick; offer it now unto thy governor (Mal 1:8), either as tribute or as a present, when thou art entreating his favour, or in gratitude for some favour received; will he be pleased with thee? Or, rather, will he not take himself to be affronted by it?" Note, Those who are careless and irreverent in the duties of religious worship should consider what a shame it is to offer that to their God which they would scorn to offer to their governor, to be more observant of the laws of breeding and good manners than of the laws of religion, and more afraid of being rude than of being profane. 2. Could they imagine that such sacrifices as these would be pleasing to God, or answer the end of sacrifices? "Should I accept this at your hand, saith the Lord? Mal 1:13. Have you any reason to think I should either not discern or not resent the affront, that I should connive at the violation of my own laws? No (Mal 1:10); I have no pleasure in you, and therefore, I will not accept an offering, such an offering, at your hand." If God has no pleasure in the person, if the person be not in a justified state, if he be not sanctified, God will not accept the offering. God had respect to Abel first and then to his sacrifice. Note, In order to our acceptance with God it is not enough to do that which, for the matter of it, is good, but we must do it from a right principle, in a right manner, and for a right end. It was the ancient rule laid down (Ge 4:7), If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? Now, if we be not accepted of God, in vain do we worship him; it is all lost labour; nay, we are all undone, for ever undone, if we come short of God's acceptance. Those therefore make a bad bargain for themselves who, to save charges in their religion, miss all the ends of it, and, by thinking to go the nearest way to work, bring nothing to pass. Those who make it the top of their ambition, as we all ought to do, whether present or absent, to be accepted of the Lord, will not dare to bring the torn, and the lame, and the sick, for sacrifice. 3. How could they expect to prevail with God in their intercessions for the people when they thus affronted God in their sacrifices? So some understand Mal 1:9, as spoken ironically, "And now if you will do the duty of priests, and stand in the gap to turn away the judgments of God that you see ready to pour in upon us, I pray you, beseech God that he will be gracious to us, and to our land which is almost eaten up with locusts and caterpillars," as appears Mal 3:11. "Try now what interest you have at the throne of grace; improve it for the removing of this plague, for it has been by your means; you have provoked God to send it. But as you go on thus to profane his sacred things will he regard your persons or your prayers? No, you cannot prevail with him to command it away." For, if we regard iniquity in our hearts, God will not hear us, either for ourselves or for others. 4. Had God deserved this at their hands? No, he had provided comfortably for them, and had given them such encouragement in their work as might have engaged them to do it cheerfully and well; so some understand Mal 1:10, "Who is there among you that shall shut a door, or kindle a fire, for nought? No, God does not expect you should serve him for nothing; you are well paid for it, and shall be so; not a cup of cold water, given for the honour of God, shall lose its reward." Note, The consideration of our constant receivings from God, and the present rewards of obedience in obedience, very much aggravates our slothfulness and niggardliness in our returns of duty to God.

IV. He calls them to repentance for their profanations of his holy name. So we may understand Mal 1:9, "Now, I pray you, beseech God that he will be gracious to us. Humble yourselves for your sin, cry mightily to God for pardon, and make up in the faith and fervency of your prayers what has been wanting in the worth and value of your sacrifices; for all the rebukes of Providence we are under are by your means." Note, Those who have by their sins helped to kindle a fire are highly concerned by their repentance, prayers, and the personal reformation, to help to quench it. We must see how much God's judgments are by our means, and be awakened thereby to be earnest with him to return in mercy; and, if we take not this course, how can we think he should regard our persons?

V. He declares his resolution both to secure the glory of his own name and to reckon with those who profane it. Those who put contempt upon God and religion, and think to run down sacred things, let them know,

1. That they shall not gain their point. God will magnify his law and make it honourable, though they vilify it and make it contemptible; for (Mal 1:11) from the rising of the sun to the going down of the same my name shall be great among the Gentiles. It might be said, "If these are not the worshippers whom God will accept, then he has no worshippers." As if he must make the best of their service, or else he would have no service done him; and then what will he do for his great name? But let him alone for that; though Israel be not faithful, be not gathered, yet God will be glorious. Though these priests provoke him to take down the ceremonial economy, and to abolish that law of commandments, which could not make the comers thereunto perfect, yet he will be no loser by that, at the long run; for, (1.) Instead of those carnal ordinances, which they profaned, a spiritual way of worship shall be introduced and established: Incense shall be offered to God's name (which signifies prayer and praise, Ps 141:2, Re 8:3), instead of the blood and fat of bulls and goats. And it shall be a pure offering, refined, not only from the corruptions that were in the priests' practice, but from the mere bodily exercise that was in the institutions themselves, which are called carnal ordinances, imposed till the time of reformation, Heb 9:10. When the hour came in which the true worshippers worshipped the Father in spirit and in truth, then this incense was offered, even this pure offering. (2.) Instead of his being worshipped and served among the Jews only, a small people in a corner of the world, he will be served and worshipped in all places, from the rising of the sun to the going down of the same; in every place, in every part of the world, incense shall be offered to his name; nations shall be discipled, and shall speak of the wonderful works of God, and have them spoken to them in their own language. This is a plain prediction of that great revolution in the kingdom of grace by which the Gentiles, who had been strangers and foreigners, came to be fellow-citizens with the saints and of the household of God, and as welcome to the throne of grace as ever the Jews had been. It is twice said (for the thing was certain), My name shall be great among the Gentiles, whereas hitherto in Judah only he was known, and his name was great, Ps 76:1. God's name shall be declared to them, the declaration of it shall be received and believed, and there shall be those among the Gentiles who shall magnify and glorify the name of God better than ever the Jews had done, even the priests themselves.

2. That they shall not go unpunished, Mal 1:14. Here is the doom of those who do like these priests, for the sentence on them is a sentence on all such. Observe, (1.) The description of profane and careless worshippers. They are such as vow and sacrifice to the Lord a corrupt thing when they have in their flock a male. They have of the best, wherewith to serve and honour him, so bountiful has be been in his gifts to them, but they put him off with the worst, and think that good enough for him, so ungrateful are they in their returns to him. This was the fault of the people, but the priests connived at it, and indulged them in it. We find a distinction in the law which allowed that to be offered for a free-will offering which would not be accepted for a vow, Le 22:23. But the priests would accept it, though God would not, pretending to be more indulgent than he was, for which he will give them no thanks another day. (2.) The character given of such worshippers. They are deceivers; they deal falsely and fraudulently with God; they play the hypocrite with him; they pretend to honour him, in making the vow, but, when it comes to be performed, they put an affront upon him, to such a degree that it would have been better not to have vowed than to vow and thus to pay; but let not such be themselves deceived, for God is not mocked. Those who think to put a cheat upon God will prove, in the end, to have put a damning cheat upon their own souls. Hypocrites are deceivers, and they will prove self-deceivers, and so self-destroyers. (3.) The doom passed upon them: They are cursed; they expect a blessing, but will meet with a curse, the tokens of God's wrath, according to the judgment written. (4.) The reason of this doom: "For I am a great King, saith the Lord of hosts, and therefore will reckon with those who deal with me but as a man like themselves; my name is dreadful among the heathen, and therefore I will not bear that it should be contemptible among my own people." The heathen paid more respect to their gods, though idols, than the Jews did to theirs, though the only true and living God. Note, The consideration of God's universal dominion, and the universal acknowledgment of it, should restrain us from all irreverence in his service.